Back to @Benzinga's profile

Benzinga engagement report

@Benzinga - 346K followers on X

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 346K followers
Per impression
0.062%
6.4K views on a typical post
Reach
1.86%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.4/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 346K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.062% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 51% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 425 interactions, about 106x its own typical post.

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Benzinga's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Benzinga sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link51% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 51% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 503 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 2026106x their median

    GameStop CEO Ryan Cohen (@ryancohen) just bought $20.38M worth of $GME. He purchased 1M shares at $20.38. https://t.co/UrKndbMDxl

    3892610013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20267.8x their median

    Fed Rate Decision LIVE: First Hike Since 2023? | FOMC Press Conference [September 2026] https://t.co/CjZBX3IwZr

    15412020K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20267.0x their median

    Sky Elements Drones (@SkyElementsUSA) lit up New York Harbor with 2,977 lights for a September 11 memorial, one for every life lost. The display recreated the Twin Towers over the skyline in a tribute 25 years after the attacks. https://t.co/xla3jgJNa8

    2250111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.5x their median

    Nvidia ($NVDA) is now the cheapest Magnificent 7 stock by forward P/E. $TSLA: 156x $AAPL: 33x $AMZN: 25x $GOOG: 23x $MSFT: 21x S&P 500: 20x $META: 17x $NVDA: 16x That puts Nvidia below every other Mag 7 name shown and even below the broader S&P 500. For a company still posting some of the fastest growth in the market, that valuation gap is hard to ignore. Is $NVDA actually cheap?

    202317.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20266.0x their median

    SpaceX ($SPCX) CFO Bret Johnsen says China has an “amazing space program,” but is “not on a Starship level.” He says full Starship reuse could drive launch costs sharply lower and make orbital AI compute competitive with Earth-based data centers.

    2012111K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20264.5x their median

    Morgan Stanley upgraded Robinhood ($HOOD) to Overweight and raised its target to $150. The call is about prediction markets. Robinhood made $156M from the product in Q2, more than stock trading or crypto.

    1313111K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.0x their median

    Citi says Meta’s ($META) Muse AI agent could generate more than $27B in annual revenue by 2030. The forecast includes roughly $23B from transaction fees and $4.5B from subscriptions as Meta pushes Muse deeper into shopping, travel and commerce.

    122206.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.5x their median

    Oman Postpones Iran Meeting, Saudi Pipeline Shutdown Squeezes Oil: Brent Hits $107, Nasdaq Futures Sink on AI Jitters. https://t.co/YEmnBFQ0Sc

    001317.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20263.3x their median

    Elon says Tesla's new Cybercab factory runs 5x faster than any car plant on Earth thanks to the "unboxed" process. https://t.co/KGDKlZmDls

    73218.4K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20263.0x their median

    Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has opened an investigation into UnitedHealth Group ($UNH) over allegations that the insurer used unlawful practices to delay care, deny coverage and interfere with medical decisions. The probe focuses on reports that UnitedHealth mishandled insurance benefits and patient-care decisions in ways that may have prevented Texans from receiving necessary treatment. One allegation claims the company improperly incentivized nursing homes to delay sending patients to hospitals even when more advanced care was urgently needed. In another case, a Texas patient reportedly received prior authorization for a procedure at an Austin surgery center, only to have the insurer reverse that approval after the operation and leave the patient facing a large unexpected bill. Texas officials are also examining whether UnitedHealth crossed into the corporate practice of medicine by overruling doctors and dictating patient-care decisions. Paxton said repeated reports about UnitedHealth’s treatment of consumers raised serious concerns, adding that the state would not tolerate insurers putting financial interests ahead of patients. The investigation adds to broader scrutiny surrounding UnitedHealth. Shareholders previously filed a derivative lawsuit accusing current and former executives of governance failures tied to Medicare practices, algorithmic care denials and insider stock sales. UnitedHealth has not yet publicly responded to the latest Texas investigation.

    61505.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 346K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.062% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video and 51% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 425 interactions, about 106x its own typical post.

What is Benzinga's engagement rate on X?
Benzinga (@Benzinga) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 100 original posts from the last 30 days against 345,518 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Benzinga sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Benzinga have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Benzinga post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going