Back to @BenjaminNorton's profile

Ben Norton engagement report

@BenjaminNorton - 345K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.317%
of 345K followers
Per impression
3.36%
33K views on a typical post
Reach
9.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.31%
101 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.17/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 0.317%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 3.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tag: #nicaragua.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ben Norton's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 81% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.317%, Ben Norton sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link69% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 69% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 308 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202615x their median

    📄El Perú rompe relaciones diplomáticas con la República Islámica de Irán 👉🏻https://t.co/swBZItTpDi https://t.co/5UMYLHjLhp

    11K2.2K2.0K874876K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202612x their median

    Trump says that there are too many non-working holidays in the US https://t.co/KgMP020X9D

    9.2K6332.5K1.1K1.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202611x their median

    Colombia has a new far-right multimillionaire president, Abelardo de la Espriella. He is a US citizen who voted for Trump. He wants Colombia to adopt the US dollar. He worked for years as a lawyer in Miami, defending drug traffickers. He also loves Israel. Neocolonialism. https://t.co/1USSdD1xld

    7.9K3.8K248140118K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20267.2x their median

    Working harder is a scam https://t.co/1yayyhon1X

    6.6K8562111661.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.9x their median

    How USA & Israel put drug cartel-linked US citizen in power in Colombia Colombia's ex President Gustavo Petro accused USA and Israel of meddling in the election to put in power a far-right, Trump-backed, pro-Israel US citizen and ally of drug traffickers. https://t.co/w1IBbiC7Sp

    2.6K1.6K373035K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.1x their median

    Huge scandal unfolding in Latin America: Far-right operative Fernando Cerimedo tried to assassinate his ex-girlfriend. He oversaw election meddling and disinfo campaigns for many right-wing presidents. He's closely linked to Trump admin. I explained it: https://t.co/Y9iumZanUQ

    1.5K796162119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.7x their median

    Neoconservative propagandist Gordon G. Chang has been wrong about China for his entire career, but he always fails up and is published in the corporate media because he's a loyal imperialist. Chang is now calling for the US to prevent Cuba from importing food and solar panels -- in addition to cutting off its oil supply, as Washington has already been doing. This is sociopathic sadism. US imperialists are trying to kill as many Cubans as possible, to cause societal collapse, so they can recolonize the country and make it into a new Epstein island.

    1.4K434322330K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    Huge scandal: Far-right election meddling specialist Fernando Cerimedo was arrested for trying to kill his pregnant ex-girlfriend. Using bots, disinfo, and fraud, he oversaw campaigns of Latin America’s pro-US presidents, with deep links to Trump admin. https://t.co/z0wiR76HIS

    7464045811K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    The dollar system is in crisis: In this article, I explain how the US intervention to prop up the yen was not just about Japan, but a crisis in the US-dominated financial system. Washington fears higher borrowing costs, as global dedollarization grows. https://t.co/qu9xDb4LMn

    698304101217K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    well isn't that interesting! https://t.co/jYYcBa1p2q https://t.co/qAys5LXv8c

    7121122643160K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nicaragua

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 345K followers, an engagement rate of 0.317%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 33K times each, and 3.36% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.43% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 69% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 15x its own typical post.

What is Ben Norton's engagement rate on X?
Ben Norton (@BenjaminNorton) has an engagement rate of 0.317%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 345,168 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.317%, Ben Norton sits above the 50th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BenjaminNorton have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BenjaminNorton post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going