Back to @Benaskren's profile

Funky πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ engagement report

@Benaskren - 517K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.115%
of 517K followers
Per impression
1.25%
48K views on a typical post
Reach
9.21%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
593
interactions (median)
Saved
0.006%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 593 interactions against 517K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 4,104 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 167x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Funky πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,104 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.115%, Funky πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ sits above the 50th percentile of the 39,793 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.082% to 0.442%.

p100.002%
p250.013%
p50 (median)0.082%
p750.442%
p902.08%
p99149.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 39,793 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 93,223 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.013%
50th percentile0.082%
75th percentile0.442%
90th percentile2.08%
99th percentile149.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%56K
01:00 UTC-2%57K
02:00 UTC-3%55K
03:00 UTC-4%59K
04:00 UTC-6%47K
05:00 UTC-4%46K
06:00 UTC-4%53K
07:00 UTC-5%57K
08:00 UTC-4%66K
09:00 UTC-4%77K
10:00 UTC-3%79K
11:00 UTC-3%86K
12:00 UTC-2%95K
13:00 UTC-2%103K
14:00 UTC-3%106K
15:00 UTC-2%110K
16:00 UTC-3%107K
17:00 UTC-2%99K
18:00 UTC-2%92K
19:00 UTC-2%87K
20:00 UTC-1%82K
21:00 UTC-1%73K
22:00 UTC-1%63K
23:00 UTC-1%56K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%247K
Monday+1%316K
Tuesday-3%332K
Wednesday-3%282K
Thursday-2%257K
Friday-3%268K
Saturday+3%241K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 2026167x their median

    Throughout today's hearing, Anthony Fauci repeated the following script 111 times. And yes, his refusal to testify is grounds for contempt. https://t.co/mu1wkN6iLN

    69K13K16K1.4K2.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202632x their median

    That’s a civilization ending statistic. What are we we even doing. https://t.co/GLGXaygDyw

    16K1.4K1.1K6072.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202621x their median

    Some people talk about leaving it all on the mat!!! I really got to. What an amazing sport and what a blessed life I get to live πŸ™πŸ™πŸ™

    12K50228028218K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20263.4x their median

    Bro McKinney was tired and just didn’t want to fight anymore

    1.9K42885137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.9x their median

    MrBallen, a former Navy SEAL, discusses with Joe Rogan the two types of people most likely to make it through Navy SEAL training. We all know one of the two types. 🀼πŸ’ͺ🏼 https://t.co/UroXzvyeAR

    9771142026807K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    Gold has a problem the gold community doesn't bring up much. You can't verify it. Not really. Not without destroying it or trusting somebody. To confirm a bar is what it claims to be, you need one of these: β€’ Drill it and assay the core β€’ X-ray fluorescence, which reads the surface and misses a tungsten center β€’ Ultrasound, which needs a trained operator and clean geometry β€’ Specific gravity testing, which the right alloy blend defeats β€’ Or you take the vault's word for it That last one is what nearly everyone actually does. Tungsten-cored fakes have turned up in Manhattan's diamond district carrying legitimate refiner stamps. They passed the visual check. They passed the weight check. Verifying Bitcoin costs nothing and takes seconds. Every node checks every rule on every block. No assayer, no lab, no trust. Five thousand years of "you can hold it in your hand," and you still can't tell if it's real.

    69169981152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    AEODEN SINCLAIR!!! WORLD CHAMPION πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯

    6191914017K viewsView on X
  • Jul 11, 2026

    Holy crap Merab!!! man he came to compete and that freaking place was going nuts @RAFWrestlingUSA

    6161310136K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    All of the moron foreign wrestling X accounts who act like being in shape is illegal crack me up so hard πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚πŸ˜‚. Especially in light of the amount of drug tests failed by athletes from their countries.

    5611418031K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    Man this @RAFWrestlingUSA card is so good that Ono vs Davino is leading it off!!! Pumped for the anniversary show, hope everyone tunes in on @foxnation

    22337119K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 593 interactions against 517K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 4,104 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 48K times each, and 1.25% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.21% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 45% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 167x its own typical post.

What is Funky πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ's engagement rate on X?
Funky πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ (@Benaskren) has an engagement rate of 0.115%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 516,698 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.115%, Funky πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ sits above the 50th percentile of the 39,793 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Benaskren have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (4,104 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Benaskren post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going