Back to @Benaskren's profile

Funky ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ engagement report

@Benaskren - 514K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.064%
of 514K followers
Per impression
1.92%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
3.34%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
329
interactions (median)
Saved
0.009%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.1/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
03:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 329 interactions against 514K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 301x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #raf13, #raf14, #rafabudhabi.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 18, 2026. Recurring tags: #raf13, #raf14, #rafabudhabi.

Compared with accounts its own size

Funky ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 66% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.064%, Funky ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,136 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.669%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,136 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.669%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 03:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video20% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 20% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 130 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 29, 2026301x their median

    Throughout today's hearing, Anthony Fauci repeated the following script 111 times. And yes, his refusal to testify is grounds for contempt. https://t.co/mu1wkN6iLN

    69K13K16K1.4K2.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202659x their median

    Thatโ€™s a civilization ending statistic. What are we we even doing. https://t.co/GLGXaygDyw

    16K1.4K1.1K6312.3M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202652x their median

    Some people talk about leaving it all on the mat!!! I really got to. What an amazing sport and what a blessed life I get to live ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™

    12K50228028218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202628x their median

    UFC lightweight became super easy. Arman vs Gaethje for title and Paddy vs Ilia #1 contender!!

    9.0K2348324187K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202620x their median

    Floyd Mayweather dropped a commercial announcing his own law firm ๐Ÿ˜ญ โ€œ50-0. Never lost. Never will.โ€ https://t.co/gwYRyqPnCf

    5.7K2182761881.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202619x their median

    Did Usman Nurmagomedov try to back elbow Song Yadong while he was celebrating? https://t.co/r2efIfamOz

    5.8K162257713.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 20268.3x their median

    Bro McKinney was tired and just didnโ€™t want to fight anymore

    1.9K42885137K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20263.5x their median

    MrBallen, a former Navy SEAL, discusses with Joe Rogan the two types of people most likely to make it through Navy SEAL training. We all know one of the two types. ๐Ÿคผ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿผ https://t.co/UroXzvyeAR

    9781132027809K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20263.1x their median

    Wrestling is so much more fun to watch than BJJ

    9213354633K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.6x their median

    Gold has a problem the gold community doesn't bring up much. You can't verify it. Not really. Not without destroying it or trusting somebody. To confirm a bar is what it claims to be, you need one of these: โ€ข Drill it and assay the core โ€ข X-ray fluorescence, which reads the surface and misses a tungsten center โ€ข Ultrasound, which needs a trained operator and clean geometry โ€ข Specific gravity testing, which the right alloy blend defeats โ€ข Or you take the vault's word for it That last one is what nearly everyone actually does. Tungsten-cored fakes have turned up in Manhattan's diamond district carrying legitimate refiner stamps. They passed the visual check. They passed the weight check. Verifying Bitcoin costs nothing and takes seconds. Every node checks every rule on every block. No assayer, no lab, no trust. Five thousand years of "you can hold it in your hand," and you still can't tell if it's real.

    68970961153K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#raf13#raf14#rafabudhabi

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 329 interactions against 514K followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 64% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.92% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.34% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 20% carry an image or video, 10% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 99K interactions, about 301x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #raf13, #raf14, #rafabudhabi.

What is Funky ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ's engagement rate on X?
Funky ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ (@Benaskren) has an engagement rate of 0.064%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 513,721 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.064%, Funky ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ sits above the 25th percentile of the 200,136 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Benaskren have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 64% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Benaskren post?
Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going