Back to @BenHansen00's profile

Ben Hansen engagement report

@BenHansen00 - 53K followers on X

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.099%
of 53K followers
Per impression
2.54%
2.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
52
interactions (median)
Saved
0.218%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.53/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Wednesday

Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 53K followers, an engagement rate of 0.099%. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 2.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 740 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.099%, Ben Hansen sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link25% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 281 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 8, 202614x their median

    uNHIdden launches Preparedness Plan - a public health approach to disclosure Today uNHIdden publishes Preparing for Disclosure ‒ the first public health preparedness framework for paradigm-shifting discoveries. Governments prepare for pandemics, natural disasters and industrial incidents. Almost nobody is preparing for the human consequences of a discovery that fundamentally changes how people understand themselves and their place in the universe. Whatever is disclosed, people matter. #uNHIdden #PublicHealth #Disclosure #OntologicalShock https://t.co/HQoXyfNM01

    5161513538249K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20266.9x their median

    Our advisory board member Avi Loeb announces that the White House, AARO, and ODNI have asked him to assemble and lead a new UAP Science Advisory Council, bringing scientific rigor to the study of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena. https://t.co/PEWi5k0R5L

    2745722788K viewsView on X
  • Jun 25, 20265.0x their median

    Sen. Rounds announced next week they will reintroduce parts of the UAP Disclosure Act in an amendment to the next NDAA. Specifically, they'll add the whistleblower protections and the disclosure review board. He reminded attendees that "disclosure is a marathon and not a sprint". https://t.co/qpFCH5w6cn

    20544815.9K viewsView on X
  • May 24, 20263.8x their median

    The recently released DOW "Syrian UAP- Instant Acceleration" video reminded me of the phenomenon we captured on a full spectrum cam on Fact or Faked in 2012. Notice the tracking box also picked up on the object's water reflection. My team visually saw it appear within the trees. https://t.co/4MyBOrjZCC

    1632311114K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.3x their median

    We are delighted to announce the establishment of uNHIdden Inc., a U.S. 501(c)(3) nonprofit organisation. uNHIdden Inc. is an independent U.S. nonprofit organization that shares the mission and objectives of the UK's uNHIdden Foundation. It has been established to advance that mission within the United States by advocating for better support for experiencers and improved preparedness for the human consequences of possible disclosure. Those wishing to support the work of uNHIdden Inc. are warmly invited to contact us at [email protected].

    124414534K viewsView on X
  • May 8, 20262.9x their median

    1) The document below has been posted by many X accounts today. I have not seen it before, but there are several highly incongruent elements that indicate forgery. VADM P.F. Carter did not become director of the Joint Staff until July 1, 1985, but the memo is dated May 28, 1985. https://t.co/PQleHopcAW

    107306950K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20262.5x their median

    This is one of the most eye-catching vids in the UAP tranche. But without more info, we can't rule out prosaics. MISREP states the asset (most likely MQ-9 Reaper) was 120 knots. UAP "estimated" 480mph at 22,000 ft. But how was that derived? The data is key to assign value to it. https://t.co/SDeqpVtRHN

    106111107.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20262.4x their median

    The search for General McCasland resumed in the Sandia Mountains last week. I hiked there today. I underestimated the density of some vegetated areas just 1 mile from his house. If that's where he went, I do think it's possible that evidence may take a very long time to find. https://t.co/UtQ8mq5huR

    10641217.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20261.9x their median

    Many view the UAP Disclosure topic as a "tell all" event. However, we should now seriously consider the possibility of a partial "fragmented" disclosure with acknowledgment, but no definitive proof released. How will the impact of such a scenario differ from "full disclosure"?

    73419119K viewsView on X
  • Jul 4, 20261.7x their median

    Happy Independence Day America! I'm grateful to live in this amazing country and to have friends, family, and freedom. Stay safe everyone and press onward! https://t.co/7BKFC3g9lN

    803601.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 52 interactions against 53K followers, an engagement rate of 0.099%. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 2.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.53 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 25% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 740 interactions, about 14x its own typical post. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Ben Hansen's engagement rate on X?
Ben Hansen (@BenHansen00) has an engagement rate of 0.099%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 52,795 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.099%, Ben Hansen sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BenHansen00 have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @BenHansen00 post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going