Back to @BelGris's profile

Bel Gris engagement report

@BelGris - 354K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.115%
of 354K followers
Per impression
1.71%
23K views on a typical post
Reach
6.68%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
402
interactions (median)
Saved
0.117%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 402 interactions against 354K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bel Gris's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.115%, Bel Gris sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,225 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,900 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video71% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link39% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 71% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 39% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 215 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 3, 202657x their median

    "Que arda todo 6-2" Segunda parte del programa que emitimos en directo a través de Bel Gris Selection TV. ¡Y como veis, lo bien que lo pasamos con Lucas Moreno! 🆕https://t.co/fGGrg886ZC🆕 The second part of the show that we made on Bel Gris Selection TV. You see, we enjoyed a lot with Lucas Moreno!

    20K3.0K4912245K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202633x their median

    Casting Bel Gris Selection https://t.co/56SVaoqSq6 https://t.co/hB8mnJS21l

    12K1.5K236173K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202622x their median

    😃🚤 https://t.co/T2fmxWItKu

    8.0K65583753K viewsView on X
  • Mar 22, 202614x their median

    Dame azúcar. Give me sugar. https://t.co/ndbpSRkYdp

    5.3K284614719K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202614x their median

    Las imágenes explícitas pueden ser belleza. Nos criminalizan, pintan a la pornografía como nociva. El problema de la adicción al sexo no es el sexo, sino otras causas. Lo mismo pasa con la pornografía. ¿Tan perjudicial es la pornografía o las verdaderas causas de los males son otras? No a la represión, sí a la reivindicación, sí a la libertad, sí a Tetatita. https://t.co/gH7ZAN8PHK

    4.9K52513392K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20267.3x their median

    Escuchando la mar movida. Listening the sound of the moved sea. https://t.co/x929HSnuJS

    2.7K16223025K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20265.6x their median

    Mirando la TV. Watching TV. https://t.co/4jhCgqB9NU

    2.1K11343137K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20263.5x their median

    Ya disponible la segunda parte de "Enzarzados en el Bosque". *Para Suscriptores Tetatita y Suscriptores Premium. 🆕https://t.co/UOQEXrVOLf🆕 Available the second part of "Entwined in the forest". https://t.co/r3LNIYACe7

    1.3K1429049K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20263.2x their median

    Quienes amamos los buenos coches quisiéramos conducir un clásico con tracción trasera que esté por estrenar. Those of us who love fine cars would love to drive a brand-new rear-wheel-drive classic. https://t.co/3vk6Kcql8X

    1.2K5927024K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20262.8x their median

    Me apetece con dos tías. https://t.co/IR197ZZvDP I'd love it with two women. https://t.co/WegPbng59R

    1.0K709040K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 402 interactions against 354K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 23K times each, and 1.71% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.64% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 71% carry an image or video and 39% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 57x its own typical post.

What is Bel Gris's engagement rate on X?
Bel Gris (@BelGris) has an engagement rate of 0.115%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 353,646 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.115%, Bel Gris sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,225 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BelGris have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BelGris post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going