Avinash Pandey engagement report
@BeingAvinash_ - 104K followers on X
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 104K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 575 times each, and 0.522% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.554% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 8672x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #iaf, #madrashighcourt.
Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026. Recurring tags: #breaking, #iaf, #madrashighcourt.
Compared with accounts its own size
Avinash Pandey's engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 25% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.003%, Avinash Pandey sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 92% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 268 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 13, 20268672x their median
ABHIJEETDIPKE x HELLELYNG: Coming this week :) IT-trolls will have to work OT 😉 https://t.co/ocdEv3ylaj
- Oct 14, 20266579x their median
Waving Tiranga is not a crime! In solidarity with my brothers @AshutoshRanka & @SauravDassss https://t.co/bqWAptlsm9
- Oct 14, 20263252x their median
Delhi police lied in front of court today that a call was given for other protesters to join at Jantar Mantar yesterday. Absolutely false! No public call was ever made. I feel bad that police has to act on orders from “top”- itni wafadari!
- Oct 14, 20262300x their median
In #MadrasHighCourt While hearing a plea against denial of permission for #RSS route march Judge: If they're able to have a march in a terrorist infected place like J&K, why is TN police denying permission every year https://t.co/0pw0jY56i7
- Oct 14, 20261217x their median
🚨 “KYUN DESH KO BARBAAD KAR RAHA HAI?” Angry passengers confronted CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke at Delhi Airport, shouting at him as he shamelessly flashed a thumbs-up and walked away. Public anger is getting louder! https://t.co/qoQcQLGyWY
- Oct 14, 2026516x their median
ECOSYSTEM'S "FALSEHOODS" EXPOSED HERE'S THE FULL TEXT OF THE MAGISTRATE'S ORDER in the case of Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka . Respondents 1) Mr Saurav Das, age 27 years, and 2) Mr Ashutosh Ranka, age 30 years, are produced in police custody before this court. Both of them were apprised of their rights as detained persons and were heard at length. Their constitutional rights as an accused were explained to them in Hindi, a language understood by all of them. A copy of Kalandra is provided to both respondents free of cost. I have perused the Kalandra and other materials available on record. The complainant, SI Mohit Bhati, No. D-6556, appeared before this court. As per the Investigating Officer, inputs were received that on 13.10.2026, some CJP workers, under the leadership of Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, might create a disturbance at Jantar Mantar(which is no longer a designated protest site) and disrupt the law and order situation. Adequate security arrangements were made in this regard. The staff deployed for the arrangements were properly briefed and instructed to remain vigilant. These persons had also posted extensively on social media urging the public to gather. Around 9 am, some persons, along with CJP leaders Saurav Das and Ashutosh Ranka, jumped from inside the premises of the JDU Office and reached Jantar Mantar. They began raising slogans and creating a disturbance. They were brought under control with difficulty with the help of the staff. Even prior to this incident, information regarding a protest call was given by the CJP through social media at Jantar Mantar, New Delhi, on 10.10.2026, without obtaining permission from the Delhi Police authorities. Further, inputs were received that the CJP members might continue their protest and create a law and order situation. Accordingly, a police team was deployed at IGI Airport, Terminal-3, New Delhi, on 10.10.2026, as the above-said CJP members were expected to arrive by flight to participate in the proposed protest. At about 10:45 am, the above-said accused persons along with Abhijeet Dipke, arrived at the airport. The police team requested them to cooperate and maintain law and order; however, they allegedly became aggressive and hostile. Thereafter, the above-said accused persons along with Abhijeet Dipke were apprehended and taken to the concerned police offices/units for further necessary action. They all remain adamant about instigating the general public to join the illegal protest. Consequently, preventive action under Section 126/170 BNSS was initiated on 11.10.2026 against the above-said accused persons along with Abhijeet Dipke in view of the apprehension of breach of peace. The above-said accused persons, along with Abhijeet Dipke, admitted their mistake. They filled personal bonds and surety bonds of Rs 50,000 each for keeping peace and good behaviour in the area. The SEM Court, in its order, directed that “they are bound to keep peace in the area for a period of one year from the date of order.” However, immediately after their release, the aforesaid leaders again began issuing calls through different platforms and social media to protest at the de-notified protest site of Jantar Mantar and started holding press conferences to instigate people to come to Jantar Mantar. On 13.10.2026, respondents Ashutosh Ranka and Saurav Das, despite being repeatedly explained, persisted with their actions, continued to violate legal restrictions while making videos, and kept instigating people to come to Jantar Mantar. The complainant, SI Mohit Bhati, submitted that they conducted a thorough enquiry into the matter and found all the respondents to be adamant and aggressive, exhibiting no remorse. Arguments heard. The IO has also informed that the videos made and posted on social media by the accused persons have been provided with the Kalandara in a pen drive, wherein the accused persons are seen adamant and hostile.
- Oct 12, 2026288x their median
Bheed toh Bharat Todo Yatra mein bhi thi... Vote results mein kuch hua? Aaya fir bhi Modi he https://t.co/daUSwtsvyX
- Oct 14, 2026153x their median
open threat by neha bora https://t.co/W4tbxRHONF
- Oct 14, 202698x their median
Jai Jagannath 🙏 https://t.co/iRFzhxFGZF
- Oct 13, 20264.0x their median
Witness the Change since Bengal threw Dictator Mamata Banerjee out of power https://t.co/pLR7aHEpsa
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 3 interactions against 104K followers, an engagement rate of 0.003%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 8% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 575 times each, and 0.522% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.554% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 26K interactions, about 8672x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #breaking, #iaf, #madrashighcourt.
- What is Avinash Pandey's engagement rate on X?
- Avinash Pandey (@BeingAvinash_) has an engagement rate of 0.003%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 103,802 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.003%, Avinash Pandey sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BeingAvinash_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 8% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BeingAvinash_ post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.