critter engagement report
@BecomingCritter - 195K followers on X
Measured over 68 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 195K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 68 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 68 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 214K interactions, about 1844x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nintendoswitch2, #tearsofthekingdom, #zelda.
Measured over 68 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tags: #nintendoswitch2, #tearsofthekingdom, #zelda.
Compared with accounts its own size
critter's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 59% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.06%, critter sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.698% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 54% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 6% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 54% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 150 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 15, 20261844x their median
dude i know this isnt what i normally post but i stumbled upon this channel of this 9 year old kid who’s apparently been running 118k usd worth of youtube ads with his dad’s BUSINESS CREDIT CARD 😭😭 https://t.co/paihyQDoiR
- Feb 20, 20221104x their median
hot person: wow everyone here is so nice
- Sep 14, 20261054x their median
being married is funny because you'll be chilling, having a bowl of cereal, and your wife will say i hate these bowls, don't you? and you'll shrug becuase you don't care and she'll say i do, they've bothered me for a while now. we need new bowls. and you'll shrug again because you have honestly, not once, ever considered the bowls at all then a few days later there will be all new bowls in the kitchen. and you'll be eating the same cereal in a different bowl, chilling, and she'll say i love these new bowls and you'll shrug again because you still don't care but she's happier and the cereal is still good and you didn't do anything at all
- Oct 7, 2026362x their median
Oct 16 https://t.co/MNwyiBiMdy
- Oct 10, 2026352x their median
In 2019, Tobey Maguire won $15.6 million playing poker against billionaire Andy Beal. Beal delayed payment and asked for a discount. Maguire spent $500,000 on a lawyer and collected his full $7.8 million share. In the video below, private poker organizer Molly Bloom describes what the Spider-Man actor was like at her table. She recalls him saying: “It’s not really about money. It’s more about crushing souls.” Bloom remembers Maguire assuring an opponent during one hand: "Listen, I have the top hand. I swear on my mother's life". The man agonized, eventually folded, and Maguire revealed the bluff. According to Bloom, he made a different demand of her: to receive a tip, she had to climb onto the table and bark like a seal. Bloom refused. She says the standoff lasted 35 minutes: the game stopped while everyone at the table watched. A few weeks later, Bloom says, Maguire arranged for one of the wealthy players to host the games at his house. The other players followed, leaving her without the game she had been running. Then Maguire called her: “You’re done. You’re over.” Lawyer Tom Goldstein helped Maguire collect the money from Beal. In January 2026, the actor described the arrangement in court, where Goldstein himself was facing tax charges. Beal had lost money to Maguire and owed him payment. Bloom refused to be humiliated and lost the game she organized. Was winning the money enough for Maguire, or did he need the people at the table to feel defeated?
- Sep 15, 2026341x their median
To celebrate its 20th anniversary, CASINO ROYALE returns to the big screen worldwide. https://t.co/dOrpP3ZCwb
- Sep 15, 2026310x their median
Zack Snyder says that he really wants to make a ‘RICK & MORTY’ movie. (Source: https://t.co/xExHQh5wHb) https://t.co/FduA5HODP5
- Sep 15, 2026209x their median
JUST IN: 9-year-old boy reportedly spends $118,000 on YouTube ads promoting his Minecraft videos using his dad’s company credit card.
- Sep 15, 2026116x their median
Vince Gilligan shows at Emmys https://t.co/ShgD1d6yQQ
- Sep 15, 2026110x their median
peak apple season is upon us https://t.co/E8Vsb54PPj
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 116 interactions against 195K followers, an engagement rate of 0.06%. Measured over 68 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 1.83% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.27% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 68 posts sampled, 54% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 214K interactions, about 1844x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #nintendoswitch2, #tearsofthekingdom, #zelda.
- What is critter's engagement rate on X?
- critter (@BecomingCritter) has an engagement rate of 0.06%, based on the median interactions across 68 original posts from the last 30 days against 195,136 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.06%, critter sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,186 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BecomingCritter have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BecomingCritter post?
- Most posts go out around 03:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.97 posts per day across the measured window.