Back to @Beatrix_vStorch's profile

Beatrix von Storch engagement report

@Beatrix_vStorch - 284K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
3.04%
of 284K followers
Per impression
15.1%
57K views on a typical post
Reach
20.2%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8.6K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.106%
61 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 8.6K interactions against 284K followers, an engagement rate of 3.04%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 15.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Beatrix von Storch's engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 3.04%, Beatrix von Storch sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 10% band, which runs 2.56% to 82.4%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 421 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 2, 20262.5x their median

    Einen Rat an Hape Kerkeling. Wenn Sie das nächste Mal zu einer Anhörung eingeladen sind, kommen Sie doch als Horst Schlämmer, das würde das Niveau Ihres Auftritts unheimlich heben. Als Schlämmer wirken Sie viel sympathischer, bodenständiger und menschlicher und nicht wie ein abgehobenes arrogantes Mitglied der links-grünen Schickeria, die den Leuten von oben herab die erklären will, was sie zu denen und zu wählen haben. Horst Schlämmer würde AfD wählen.

    18K1.9K1.0K54483K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20262.1x their median

    Jetzt will uns also auch der Finanzministernde verbieten. Diese Trümmertruppe ist so armselig wie gefährlich. Liebe SPD, kleiner Tip: Macht doch mal Politik für die deutschen Normalos und Steuerzahler und nicht nur für Illegale, Queere und das Ausland. Dann droht Euch zumindest nicht die 5%-Hürde.

    15K2.4K31240170K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20261.9x their median

    Soeben mit Wolfgang Thierse bei @NikolausBlome. Sie verstehen es einfach nicht. „Wir“ sind für Freiheit und Meinungsfreiheit damals auf die Straße gegangen. Aber d a s haben „wir“ nicht gewollt. Sie verkennen, Herr Thierse: Das „wir“ hat gerade gewählt und gesprochen. Mit nie dagewesener Wahlbeteiligung! Bitte schön:

    14K2.4K35857213K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20261.8x their median

    78 % Wahlbeteiligung in Sachsen-Anhalt, ein Rekord. Die AfD hat eine Viertelmillion Nichtwähler mobilisiert. Wir haben den Menschen die Hoffnung zurückgegeben, dass Wahlen wichtig sind und etwas verändern können. Es ist eine Sternstunde der Demokratie.

    13K1.5K15832119K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20261.7x their median

    Ich stelle mir gerade vor, was los wäre, wenn in Sachsen-Anhalt ein öffentliches Bad einen Tag in der Woche nur für Weiße öffnet. Keine Nafris. Keine Eritreer. Keine Syrer. Keine Afghanen. Da wär was los! Und ich meine jetzt nicht den Andrang.

    13K1.3K23516175K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20261.7x their median

    Man kann es mit bloßem Auge sehen. Jede Fahrt auf Schiene oder Autobahn erschüttert mich: Sie zerstören unser Land. Die Umwelt. Die Natur. Die Tierwelt. Die Energieversorgung. Die Industrie. Einfach alles. Um das „Klima“ zu retten. Sie geben zu, dass sie das so nicht erreichen. Aber sie hoffen, dass China, USA und Indien unserem Suizid folgen. Es ist eine blanke Katastrophe.

    12K2.1K80251124K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 20261.7x their median

    Merz erklärt, das Scheitern seiner schwarz-roten Koalition hätte "unermessliche Folgen" für Europa. Gibt es außer Strandkörben im Kanzleramt auch LSD im Trinkwasser? Der hat noch 10 % Unterstützung und glaubt, von ihm hänge die Zukunft Europas ab. Was muss man nehmen, um dermaßen größenwahnsinnig zu werden?

    13K1.7K39322108K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20261.6x their median

    Die Linke will die Invasoren aus Ceuta in Deutschland aufnehmen. Abschottung sei keine Lösung. Das ist ein klares Signal an die Wähler in Sachsen-Anhalt: Haltet diese Irren von der Regierung fern. Wer die brutalen Eindringlinge von Ceuta in seiner Stadt und seinem Dorf haben will, der wählt die Linke.

    12K1.9K2143084K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20261.6x their median

    Merz in seiner ersten Regierungserklärung nach dem S-A-Wahldebakel: 1.) AfD hat Wahlziel von absoluter Mehrheit verfehlt! 2.) Ukraine Ukraine Ukraine 3.) Klima Klima Klima 4.) Wirtschaft läuft. 5.) Migration: Koalition ist sich einig und macht alles richtig 6.) Bildungskrise ist „ernüchternd“ 7.) Was ist der Sinn unserer Reformen? Haben wir noch keine Antwort drauf. Aber wir arbeiten dran. 8.) Und dann bittet er um Vergebung. Es lässt einen sprachlos zurück.

    12K1.6K25014105K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20261.5x their median

    ZEUGEN GESUCHT: Apollo News vorliegende Dokumente zeigen konkrete Fluchtversuche und Schusswaffengebrauch in der Kompanie 3 des Grenzregiments 33, für die Sven Hüber als Politoffizier zuständig war. Wir würden das gerne vollständig aufarbeiten. Uns erreichen viele Leserzuschriften, es kann ein wenig dauern, bis wir sie bearbeiten können. Konkret suchen wir Soldaten des Grenzregiments 33 ab 1987. Vollständige Anonymität für ein Hintergrundgespräch und journalistischer Quellenschutz werden garantiert. Schreiben Sie uns oder verbreiten Sie den Aufruf. Jeder Hinweis zählt - die Geschichte muss aufgearbeitet werden: [email protected]

    9.7K3.4K14374294K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8.6K interactions against 284K followers, an engagement rate of 3.04%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 98% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 57K times each, and 15.1% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 20.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post.

What is Beatrix von Storch's engagement rate on X?
Beatrix von Storch (@Beatrix_vStorch) has an engagement rate of 3.04%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 284,047 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 3.04%, Beatrix von Storch sits above the 90th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Beatrix_vStorch have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 98% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Beatrix_vStorch post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going