Back to @BavarianFBWorks's profile

Bavarian Football Works engagement report

@BavarianFBWorks - 71K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.027%
of 71K followers
Per impression
1.29%
1.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
19
interactions (median)
Saved
0.068%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.5/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 71K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 604x its own typical post.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 15, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bavarian Football Works's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.027%, Bavarian Football Works sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,005 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link41% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 41% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 137 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026604x their median

    BREAKING: Allianz Arena will host the 2028 Champions League final https://t.co/E7DhTF6YEr

    10K666177413906K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026110x their median

    πŸš¨πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ EXCL | Tom Bischof, set to be nominated by JΓΌrgen Klopp for the Nations League if nothing extraordinary happens. 21 y/o promising Bayern midfielder and DFB U21 captain is set to get his chance. @SkySportDE https://t.co/6gXcnljNMr

    1.9K934322122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202667x their median

    πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ⭐️ 𝐀π₯𝐞𝐀𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐝𝐚𝐫 𝐏𝐚𝐯π₯𝐨𝐯𝐒𝐜 (𝟐𝟐) against SV Elversberg: β€’ 1 ASSIST β€’ MOST TOUCHES (132) β€’ 108 / 116 Accurate Passes β€’ 3 Chances Created β€’ 11 Passe Into Final Third β€’ 7 Recoveries β€’ 100% Aerial Duels Won β€’ 5 Touches In Opposition Box π„π‹πˆπ“π„ πŒπˆπƒπ…πˆπ„π‹πƒπ„π‘. ✨

    1.2K508724K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202654x their median

    happy 5 month anniversary to all those who celebrate https://t.co/mGWAr0isdX

    945712519K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20268.6x their median

    πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ🍺 Bayern MΓΌnchen Oktoberfest Kits Evolution https://t.co/ObsXgqjdBz

    15252515K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20266.6x their median

    We doing it again this season?! https://t.co/SLODPdtl3H

    1187001.7K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20263.8x their median

    5️⃣0️⃣0️⃣ https://t.co/hJCnMHQAQL

    666002.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.8x their median

    Could we all actually see Wirtz at Bayern at some point in the future?! πŸ“ΈCredit - @DeadlineDayLive https://t.co/rbEIVX5qGx

    3811313.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.4x their median

    Teamwork for our match winner in Elversberg πŸ’ͺπŸ‘ŒπŸ‘ https://t.co/1PAhdTkYrg

    450002.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20261.9x their median

    βž‘οΈβ„ΉοΈSacha Boey and Bara Sapoko Ndiaye were with the Bayern squad for the Elversberg match in the event that something happened with Serge Gnabry in the buildup to the match since it was his first match back in quite some time. πŸ—£οΈ"Serge was there. With Serge, there was still a bit of a residual risk, so we took one more player with us," Max Eberl explained. [@BILD] πŸ“Έ- WITTERS

    343002.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 19 interactions against 71K followers, an engagement rate of 0.027%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.5K times each, and 1.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 604x its own typical post.

What is Bavarian Football Works's engagement rate on X?
Bavarian Football Works (@BavarianFBWorks) has an engagement rate of 0.027%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 70,940 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.027%, Bavarian Football Works sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BavarianFBWorks have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BavarianFBWorks post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going