Back to @BasharatPeer's profile

Basharat Peer engagement report

@BasharatPeer - 60K followers on X

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.025%
of 60K followers
Per impression
1.16%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
15
interactions (median)
Saved
0.31%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 7 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 60K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 86% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 836 interactions, about 56x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 7 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #nepal.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Basharat Peer sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video14% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link86% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 86% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 182 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202656x their median

    I’m delighted to share that I have joined @CrisisGroup as Senior Iran Analyst. I look forward to working with an exceptional team of colleagues and contributing to Crisis Group’s mission to prevent wars and shape policies that will build a more peaceful world. https://t.co/8oFhLgJKsJ

    729375416134K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202624x their median

    'The AfD results were seismic' - @johnkampfner The Berlin-based author and journalist goes on to tell @WilfredFrost that the momentum behind the party is "being fomented by voices in Silicon Valley" https://t.co/lBHBLUX32h

    2724444424K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202618x their median

    My latest for @TIME: Trump is betting economic pressure will weaken #Iran without another war. But Tehran may conclude that waiting only leaves it weaker, making escalation paradoxically more likely. https://t.co/aLz9DWRbXv

    195620753K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 202614x their median

    (1/2) Honoured to be on @TIME’s 100 Most Influential People in AI 2026. So much of the AI conversation is about GPUs, chips, and frontier models. Public institutions and the Global South rarely get the same attention. Great to see that work get noticed. https://t.co/nPaiUMKcjJ

    1801810423K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202611x their median

    ‘Kashmiris are demanding respect and representation. In the towns and valleys of Pakistan-administered Kashmir, these aspirations cannot simply be suppressed by force,’ @AqilShah_ in @TIME https://t.co/cEsnvHDrWP

    11039748.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202611x their median

    Sonia Awale, the editor of @NepaliTimes on the tragedy in Nepal and its urgent warning for a warming world in @TIME https://t.co/BfQF7sCYHD

    10449417.3K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 2026

    On the legacy of 9/11 in contemporary politics @faisaldevji in @TIME https://t.co/owzKG7tlgn

    164001.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 2026

    ‘The role of the Secretary-General is perhaps to be both the world’s most prominent event organizer and a sort of political therapist for world leaders,’ @RichardGowan1 and @FortiD of @CrisisGroup in @TIME https://t.co/3B4acsRXmp

    126002.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 2026

    As the American and Chinese leaders meet, the most consequential question is: who is shaping the international order, and according to whose principles and rules? @Yu_JieC of @ChathamHouse in @TIME https://t.co/S3rbu1dHSF

    95111.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    On the AfD victory in Germany in @TIME https://t.co/mA1W1mstD6

    86014.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#nepal

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 15 interactions against 60K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 1.16% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 7 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 86% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 836 interactions, about 56x its own typical post. Only 7 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Basharat Peer's engagement rate on X?
Basharat Peer (@BasharatPeer) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 7 original posts from the last 30 days against 59,582 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Basharat Peer sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BasharatPeer have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @BasharatPeer post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going