Back to @BasedMikeLee's profile

Mike Lee engagement report

@BasedMikeLee - 704K followers on X

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.326%
of 704K followers
Per impression
2.65%
87K views on a typical post
Reach
12.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.3K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
28 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
4.8/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 704K followers, an engagement rate of 0.326%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 87K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 45 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tag: #metaphor.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mike Lee's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.326%, Mike Lee sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.081% to 0.439%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 202626x their median

    Constance Fisher drowned her three children in a bathtub in 1954. Mental hospital. Declared better. Released. Husband stayed. They had three more kids. She drowned those three too. Same house. Same bathtub. Same excuse. Six dead children because a system treated a child killer like a patient who just needed time. That is the whole argument. Not “was she sad.” Not “did she hear voices.” What happens after you let them out, and who pays for it the second time. Lindsay Clancy strangled her three kids. People are already writing her a sympathy card and calling prison cruel. Cruel is three little bodies. Cruel is doing it once and getting a path back to freedom. Cruel is pretending history didn’t already run this experiment and lose six kids. Mental illness can explain how someone gets there. It does not give you a free murder. It does not entitle you to more children. And it does not require the rest of us to wait around and see if the next round dies too. If you kill your kids, you don’t get to be a mother again. You don’t get a soft landing and a second family. Life without parole. Lock the door. Stop experimenting on other people’s children and making excuses. Convict her. Convict those who harm children. Period.

    48K11K1.2K5082.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202610.0x their median

    So far, in the 2026 elections, 50 mega donors have spent $1.6 BILLION. 🟦George Soros (D): $102M 🟥Jeffrey & Janine Yass (R): $93.8M 🟥Ben Horowitz & Marc Andreessen (R): $91.3M 🟥Elon Musk (R): $90.6M 🟥Elizabeth & Richard Uihlein (R): $70M 🟥Miriam Adelson (R): $67.6M 🟥Greg & Anna Brockman (R): $50M 🟥Paul Singer (R): $37.1M 🟥Cameron & Tyler Winklevoss (R): $33.2M 🟥Ken Griffin (R): $32.5M Billionaires — in either party — should not be able to buy elections. That is not democracy. That is a corrupt campaign finance system. We need to end Citizens United. We need to get super PACs out of our elections. We need public funding of elections.

    18K2.7K2.0K2532.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20268.4x their median

    The moment the league didn’t discipline Sophie Cunningham for her transphobic comments, they set the table for almost all of this political discourse and nastiness towards the trans community. Her conduct has objectively been detrimental to the league.

    11K1.7K6.1K4561.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.9x their median

    A man allegedly called off his wedding because his finance supported Lindsay Clancy. https://t.co/ZJR3FuZScC

    14K5649483782.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20266.1x their median

    All Republicans should support the Republican nominee in the U.S. Senate race in Texas

    11K1.5K1.7K113221K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20266.0x their median

    Mohan Bhagwat and his hateful Hindu nationalist ideology are not welcome in our communities. His paramilitary organization the RSS is responsible for violent attacks and pogroms against Muslims, Sikhs, Dalits, Christians, and more. We must reject all forms of hate and supremacy.

    10K1.4K2.0K342905K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20265.6x their median

    Washed NBA player Enes Kanter just got kicked out of a WNBA game after harassing players. What a loser. No NBA teams want him on their roster so he’s resorted to crap like this. Total weirdo. Find a hobby! https://t.co/R8lnCfoXhv

    9.5K6722.5K1671.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.0x their median

    Anne Hathaway: “Abortion can be another word for mercy.” Babies: “The word ‘mercy’ doesn’t mean what you think it means.” https://t.co/o2LovhCzCL

    8.5K1.1K1.5K280386K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.7x their median

    I defeated an incumbent Republican when I first ran for the Senate in 2010 The establishment did what it could to defeat me; I won anyway I find it telling & extremely irritating when Uniparty Republicans try to defeat a GOP Senate candidate, even after he wins the nomination

    8.5K1.7K4797487K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20264.2x their median

    In three words or less, how would you respond if you heard a senator say “voters don’t really care that much about the SAVE America Act”?

    4.4K7484.3K220155K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#metaphor

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.3K interactions against 704K followers, an engagement rate of 0.326%. Measured over 45 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 87K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 45 posts sampled, 69% carry an image or video and 11% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 60K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is Mike Lee's engagement rate on X?
Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) has an engagement rate of 0.326%, based on the median interactions across 45 original posts from the last 30 days against 703,511 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.326%, Mike Lee sits above the 50th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BasedMikeLee have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BasedMikeLee post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going