Back to @Barreto269's profile

Bruno Barreto engagement report

@Barreto269 - 47K followers on X

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.242%
of 47K followers
Per impression
8.69%
1.3K views on a typical post
Reach
2.79%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
114
interactions (median)
Saved
0.076%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.87/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 0.242%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 8.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bruno Barreto's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.242%, Bruno Barreto sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video38% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link41% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 41% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 143 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jan 6, 202017x their median

    Na era da pós-verdade pouco importa o compromisso com a informação. Sempre haverá público para gente que faz mau uso do jornalismo.

    1.5K15729836View on X
  • Oct 23, 202611x their median

    O debate da Intertv esquenta quando Cadu expõe a diferença entre as trajetórias dele e de Allyson. https://t.co/shltOFfR4b

    1.0K153122119K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20268.9x their median

    Cadu arrasta multidão na Zona Norte de Natal. https://t.co/PcBdXx7YSW

    8501362567.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20265.4x their median

    O debate de ontem na InterTV entre Allyson Bezerra e Cadu de Lula foi o melhor destas eleições. Teve comparação de propostas e desconstrução do adversário dentro dos limites da civilidade. O formato do debate ajudou bastante.

    583181228.1K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20264.8x their median

    Novo foco de incêndio na UFRN. O Corpo de Bombeiros já se deslocou ao local. https://t.co/rIGaod68Wu

    42584102713K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20264.6x their median

    Coordenadora de Flávio admite discutir cortes na aposentadoria e no salário mínimo https://t.co/Z4t9x0EHA8

    3521492063.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20264.2x their median

    Essas imagens são de ontem em um posto de gasolina em Mossoró. Motos fazem fila para abastecer, enquanto uma mulher com um caderninho entrega material de campanha de Allyson. https://t.co/yKi8wvpadl

    36093181117K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20264.2x their median

    Os caras estão brigando entre eles. No “Bloquinho 22” em Mossoró o pau cantou! https://t.co/TyRybv1OMx

    355793584.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 20263.6x their median

    UFRN enfrenta incêndio na noite desta sexta-feira. https://t.co/8A2PMMocsP

    307831265.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20263.3x their median

    São 44 anos participando de debates. Foram oito eleições (sete para presidente e uma para governador de SP) e nunca um adversário fez piada sobre o dedo que Lula perdeu trabalhando. Flávio Bolsonaro superou o próprio pai no quesito maldade. https://t.co/pgmX3jJZox

    268792132.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 114 interactions against 47K followers, an engagement rate of 0.242%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.3K times each, and 8.69% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.0K interactions, about 17x its own typical post.

What is Bruno Barreto's engagement rate on X?
Bruno Barreto (@Barreto269) has an engagement rate of 0.242%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 47,118 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.242%, Bruno Barreto sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Barreto269 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Barreto269 post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going