Back to @Bardissimo's profile

Alexander Bard engagement report

@Bardissimo - 141K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.194%
of 141K followers
Per impression
1.05%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
18.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
272
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 272 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.194%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alexander Bard's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.194%, Alexander Bard sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video13% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link88% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 13% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 88% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 350 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 202623x their median

    Hej och hopp! Nu är det fullt kaos i Vänsterpartiet - igen! Förutom alla förkryssade röstsedlar och generöst bortlovade nya svenska medborgarskap. Det här är ju för fan inte klokt! https://t.co/HJmZVo4ANY

    5.5K5401241077K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202615x their median

    Vi är många som delar liknande bakgrund och erfarenheter som Simona Mohamsson. Vi är inte skyldiga Socialdemokraterna någon tacksamhet. Tack Simona, för att du sätter ord på våra känslor. 🇸🇪 https://t.co/a8zRPWTmoI

    3.6K40310534227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202612x their median

    Vi sade hela tiden att det bara fanns ett enda regeringsalternativ och att det var Tidö. Nu sitter vi här med den rödgröna sörjan, både Socialdemokraterna och Centerpartiet har i sin enorma arrogans groteskt underskattat Vänsterpartiet Islamisterna. Varsågoda, bänga svenskar! https://t.co/UbUm3q6Alp

    3.0K25250749K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202611x their median

    Det är alltså Birgitta Ohlsson och inte Elisabeth Thand-Ringqvist som bestämmer i Centerpartiet. Och någon regering med Sossarna blir det inte eftersom Birgitta säger nej till både Sd och V. Så var det med den saken. Det rödgröna pajaseriet fortsätter. https://t.co/XbLHks7qxE

    2.7K21791646K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20265.8x their median

    I Sverige gäller demokratins mest grundläggande principer: fria och hemliga val, utan tvång, mutor eller annan otillbörlig påverkan. Om misstankarna om valfusk i Borlänge visar sig stämma måste rättsstaten reagera med full kraft. Daniel Schatz förklarar. https://t.co/b9VYKGDBX6

    1.4K11129321K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20264.1x their median

    Det här är alltså Miljöpartiets stora prioritet nu: Att förfölja Aron Flam! Det är liksom inte konstigt att Miljöpartiet är Sveriges mest hatade parti utanför de egna totalt humorbefriade leden. Tydligen är nazifitta det nya N-ordet! https://t.co/no5PdSJ1HJ

    9738451239K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20261.5x their median

    Efter många år i politiken, åtta år i riksdagen, fem år som Ordförande för Liberala Kvinnor, och många andra viktiga uppdrag för mitt parti, tänkte jag att valet 2026 skulle bli min sista som politiker. Men så blev det inte. I våras fick jag det fina förtroendet att axla rollen som borgarråd och ordförande för Liberalerna i Stockholm av våra medlemmar. Det är ett ansvar jag bär med stolthet och ödmjukhet. Jag valde att stanna kvar i politiken för att jag tror på liberalismen. Men också för att jag vet vad som står på spel. Jag vill att Stockholm åter ska bli en stad där skolan kommer först. Barn lär sig läsa ordentligt, klasserna blir mindre, riktiga läroböcker finns på bänkarna, stödet sätts in tidigt och vi minskar barngrupperna i förskolan. Jag vill ha en trygg stad där kvinnor kan röra sig fritt, judar kan leva trygga liv och vi aldrig viker oss för antisemitism, hedersförtryck eller extremism. Jag vill att Stockholm ska vara en stad för människor som vill framåt. Där utbildning lönar sig, arbete lönar sig och där företagare och entreprenörer får växa istället för att mötas av hinder, byråkrati och klåfingriga politiker. Och under den här valrörelsen har jag fått ännu ett skäl att fortsätta kämpa. Det är Simona Mohamsson. Jag har sett vilket mod hon har visat när pressen varit som störst. Hur hon stått rak när andra räknat ut oss. Hur hon tagit strid för liberala värderingar även när det kostat. Vi liberaler är kanske inte alltid de som väljer den enklaste vägen. Men vi ger inte upp bara för att det är motvind. Så nu ber jag om ditt förtroende. Om du också tror på kunskap, trygghet, människors möjlighet att forma sina egna liv, och att svensk jämställdhet ska gälla alla flickor och kvinnor i vår huvudstad, då hoppas jag att du ger mig ditt förtroende och din röst i detta val. Jag står etta på Liberalernas lista till kommunfullmäktige i Stockholm och tillsammans med andra duktiga partivänner vill jag framåt! Tack 💙

    3751518235K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    Uppdrag Granskning eller Uppdrag Förvanskning? Eminente Jan Söderqvist briljerar i denna utsökta avrättning av Uppdrag Gransknings journalistiska "metoder" på SVT. Denna gång dissekerar han Carolina Neuraths senaste "projekt". Läs och njut! https://t.co/rMDywIn0Xk

    3103010131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Våldtäktsdomarna haglar! Enligt radikalfeminismen gör det inte ingenting om en oskyldig man döms, eftersom det är priset man får betala för att fler skyldiga män ska dömas. Riksdagen och domstolarna understödjer denna vanvettiga häxjakt. Nina Hamilton förklarar. https://t.co/1oOGftBT7a

    17219309.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Canada joins The European Union! And Greenland is saved from the Americans! Fucking brilliant! https://t.co/pcosdiMAfj

    80423112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 272 interactions against 141K followers, an engagement rate of 0.194%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 1.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 13% carry an image or video and 88% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.1K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is Alexander Bard's engagement rate on X?
Alexander Bard (@Bardissimo) has an engagement rate of 0.194%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 140,713 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.194%, Alexander Bard sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Bardissimo have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Bardissimo post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going