Back to @Bankless's profile

Bankless engagement report

@Bankless - 411K followers on X

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.016%
of 411K followers
Per impression
0.292%
22K views on a typical post
Reach
5.42%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
65
interactions (median)
Saved
0.045%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.93/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 65 interactions against 411K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.292% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 83x its own typical post.

Measured over 22 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 31, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Bankless's engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 16% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.016%, Bankless sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Dec 8, 202583x their median

    https://t.co/ek1ivnzla3

    4.5K4882061782.0M viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.1x their median

    NEW EPISODE - What’s Next for BitMine After 5% of ETH? @BitMNR is closing in on its goal of owning 5% of all ethereum:native after 60+ straight weeks of buying. Chairman @fundstrat joins @TrustlessState to break down what happens after 5%, why BitMine may keep accumulating, and how he sees Ethereum’s next phase unfolding through tokenization, AI, and institutional adoption. Plus: why Tom thinks ETH could easily trade above $10K in the next cycle. CHAPTERS --- 0:00 BitMine’s Rapid March Toward 5% of ETH 3:36 More Than 60 Consecutive Weeks of ETH Purchases 5:29 Where BitMine’s Capital Comes From 8:27 What Happens When BitMine Reaches 5%? 13:47 Would BitMine Ever Sell Its ETH? 15:29 Maven and BitMine’s Evolution Beyond a Treasury Company 16:52 Ethereum’s Next Narrative 23:06 Does Ethereum Actually Capture Value? 29:13 Is ETH a Store of Value or a Cash-Flowing Asset? 35:19 What BitMine Has Learned From Michael Saylor 37:42 Why BitMine Issued BMNP 42:13 The Proposal That Could Reduce Staking Yield to Zero 47:54 Funding Ethereum Foundation Spinouts 53:23 BitMine’s Role in Ethereum’s Future 1:02:14 Is AI Crowding Crypto Out of the Market? 1:05:11 Has the Crypto Market Already Bottomed? 1:06:18 Tom Lee’s ETH Price Outlook

    317382419251K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.9x their median

    The August $VVV Call 📺 Live on 𝕏 — Wed, Aug 19 · 12pm ET - Venice just passed $100m ARR - VVV burns hit ATHs 8 days in a row - VVV emissions cut by 33% Tomorrow, @JonShapeShift and I are going live to break down the hottest month in Venice history 🔥 Set a reminder 👇

    1541315437K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20262.6x their median

    President Trump, from the White House, thanking the leaders of the crypto industry by name. CFTC Chairman Selig SEC Chairman Atkins Brian Armstrong from @coinbase Vlad Tenev from @RobinhoodApp Arjun Sethi from @krakenfx Sergey Nazarov from @chainlink The Winklevii from @krakenfx Chris Dixon from @a16z We've come a long way

    14879522K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20262.5x their median

    INTERVIEW: The EIP That Destroys DeFi | Stani Kulechov & Mike Silagadze Ethereum’s latest staking proposal is sparking backlash across DeFi. @aave founder @StaniKulechov and @ether_fi CEO @MikeSilagadze join @TrustlessState to break down why stake tapering could push $ETH yield toward zero, weaken solo staking, drive capital out of DeFi, and make ETH less attractive to institutions. They debate Ethereum’s monetary policy, whether the network is overpaying for security, and why trying to make ETH more like Bitcoin could undermine what makes Ethereum valuable in the first place. [TIMESTAMPS] Intro 0:00 0:09 Ethereum’s Staking Debate 2:41 Stani’s First Reaction 7:48 Mike’s Centralization Concerns 14:37 DeFi Under Pressure 17:15 Stani on Yield and Cash Flow 24:54 The Case for Vanilla Ether 27:20 Mike Pushes Back 34:27 Issuance and Monetary Policy 35:16 Minimum Viable Issuance 40:47 Institutions Need Predictability 46:10 Conservative Yield, Not Zero 47:46 Legitimacy and Process 52:54 Final Verdict on the EIP

    10817319132K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20262.5x their median

    Yo fam, we built something at @Bankless that's materially upgraded my Claude responses AI is bad at crypto. the labs clearly don't have good crypto data. So we took everything we've made (2,000+ transcripts and 5,000+ articles), and structured it into... The Bankless MCP 🤖 Plug it into your AI provider and your crypto queries instantly get better. We keep it updated with every new article and episode, so it stays current Premium members only! log in at Bankless dot com, paste the instructions into your AI (or just tell your agent to do it) and boom. check it out and lmk what you think!

    130820325K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.8x their median

    NEW EPISODE - Wall Street Wants Ethereum. Privacy Is the Bottleneck Institutions want to move onchain, but public-by-default finance still exposes too much. @eth_systems co-founders @motypes and @oskarth join @TrustlessState to break down why privacy may be Ethereum’s biggest institutional unlock, what banks and asset managers are actually asking for, and how private institutional rails could eventually plug into DeFi. CHAPTERS --- ETH Systems The Founders Institutional Privacy Real-World Use Cases From Bespoke to Scalable Building the Product Institutions Are Coming The Future of Institutional DeFi Privacy vs Transparency What Ethereum Can Do? Cypherpunks and Institutions

    901389138K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    INTERVIEW: How fomo Grew to 1.5M+ Users | Paul Erlanger @paulerlanger joins @TrustlessState to unpack @fomo's explosive rise to 1.5M+ users, what’s driving its organic growth, and why social trading may be the key to bringing a new generation onchain. They explore FOMO’s push toward sub-second crosschain execution, deeper DeFi integration, new asset classes, and the bigger vision behind it all: a world where crypto disappears into the infrastructure and users simply get a better financial app. [TIMESTAMPS] 0:00 Intro 0:16 fomo Explosive Growth 2:10 Why fomo Took Off 3:32 Who Uses fomo? 4:21 Midwest Moms Discovery 5:25 From Crypto Natives to Mainstream 7:26 Funding the fomo App 8:48 The UGC Growth Engine 10:23 Social Features That Matter 13:26 Scaling fomo’s Backend 15:18 Multi-Chain Expansion 16:42 Routing and Liquidity 18:30 Hardest Engineering Challenge 19:23 Vertical Integration Strategy 22:30 DeFi Inside fomo 24:00 Where Revenue Comes From 26:18 No Token Launchpad Plans 26:34 Retention and Stickiness 28:22 Defending Against Competitors 30:47 fomo’s Brand Challenge 33:31 What’s Coming Next

    69511419K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    "One year ago... I signed the Genius Act... ...I named it after myself" - @realDonaldTrump https://t.co/t4HiBCNbbg

    6755312K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    https://t.co/iUbEhDvJJW

    55138220K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 65 interactions against 411K followers, an engagement rate of 0.016%. Measured over 22 original posts, its engagement rate beats 24% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 22K times each, and 0.292% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 22 posts sampled, 68% carry an image or video and 27% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 83x its own typical post.

What is Bankless's engagement rate on X?
Bankless (@Bankless) has an engagement rate of 0.016%, based on the median interactions across 22 original posts from the last 30 days against 410,697 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.016%, Bankless sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Bankless have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 24% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Bankless post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going