Back to @BSPH_CHS's profile

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security engagement report

@BSPH_CHS - 687K followers on X

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.007%
of 687K followers
Per impression
0.515%
9.3K views on a typical post
Reach
1.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
48
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.1/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 687K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 0.515% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 735 interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #elbi, #biosecurity, #healthsecurity. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #elbi, #biosecurity, #healthsecurity.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99154.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,996 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 96,714 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile154.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%53K
01:00 UTC-2%54K
02:00 UTC-3%52K
03:00 UTC-4%56K
04:00 UTC-6%45K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%63K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%75K
11:00 UTC-3%82K
12:00 UTC-2%90K
13:00 UTC-2%99K
14:00 UTC-3%102K
15:00 UTC-2%105K
16:00 UTC-4%103K
17:00 UTC-3%95K
18:00 UTC-1%89K
19:00 UTC-2%84K
20:00 UTC-1%78K
21:00 UTC-1%69K
22:00 UTC-2%60K
23:00 UTC-2%54K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%239K
Monday0%303K
Tuesday-3%305K
Wednesday-1%259K
Thursday-2%251K
Friday-3%260K
Saturday+3%234K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jun 4, 202615x their median

    No one should be able to order a bioweapon through the mail. @IFP & @JoinFAI are proud to co-lead an open letter calling for mandatory DNA synthesis screening & recordkeeping. Signatories include: - Sam Altman, CEO & Co-Founder, OpenAI - Dario Amodei, CEO & Co-Founder, Anthropic - David Baker, Director, Institute for Protein Design; 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recipient - Patrick Collison, CEO & Co-Founder, Stripe - Paul Graham, Founder, Y Combinator - Demis Hassabis, CEO, Google DeepMind; 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry recipient - Emily Leproust, CEO & Co-Founder, Twist Bioscience - Lawrence Lessig, Roy L. Furman Professor of Law and Leadership, Harvard Law School - Gerald W. Parker, former Special Assistant to the President for Biosecurity and Pandemic Response - Mustafa Suleyman, CEO, Microsoft AI - Alex Tabarrok, Professor of Economics, George Mason University - Alexandr Wang, Chief AI Officer, Meta; Founder, Scale AI - Christine E. Wormuth, President & CEO, Nuclear Threat Initiative; 25th Secretary of the Army Read the letter and see the full list of signatories: https://t.co/BwZiJXw3JT Many DNA synthesis companies voluntarily screen orders to mitigate biosecurity risks, but no law requires them to do so. Leaders in AI, biotech, life sciences, national security, and the nucleic acid synthesis industry agree that Congress should act to strengthen safeguards against biological threats. @deanwball put it well in the WSJ: “If you’re synthesizing the stuff that yields biological life and viruses, we’re asking you to screen to see whether it is dangerous in some way. That seems like a reasonable thing for society to insist upon.”

    44414466811.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 20263.0x their median

    #ICYMI Watch now to learn more about the SPEAR Repository and the latest “Tip of the SPEAR” resource. The webinar covers how to access preparedness tools, upcoming plans, and ways to engage with the SPEAR community. ▶️ https://t.co/rvv0SlPcRa

    387519128.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20261.9x their median

    Last week, the Center’s Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity (#ELBI) Fellowship convened for its Research Symposium. The collaboration and innovation sparked by this meeting will enable us to address some of the most difficult #biosecurity challenges. https://t.co/vm2KfDTOiy https://t.co/76wUlC45fU

    35411056.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 2026

    🚨 Training opportunity 🚨 We are now accepting applications for our #ELBI Fellowship Class of 2027. Don't miss your chance to join this prestigious network and contribute to the future of global #healthsecurity. Apply by September 30th: https://t.co/5jebX7fhAi

    9334214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026

    Curious about the future of #biosecurity? Look no further than our Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity (#ELBI) Fellowship, where the next generation gathers. Join our community to shape the future of #healthsecurity. Find out more about our 2027 application cycle, which opens August 14, 2026: https://t.co/jpg5R82Y9E

    1418619.3K viewsView on X
  • Apr 1, 2026

    🇩🇪 is pleased to co-finance the #GPWMD Counter CBRN Disinformation Initiative with €300,000. Building resilience to disinfo narratives + tactics used by certain states to discredit international co-operation, exposing false claims + naming those responsible is key. #CWC #BTWC https://t.co/Sf4dX56qUX

    1810357.5K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 2026

    📢 Register now for a course on “Leading in a Public Health Emergency,” Nov 3-5 @JHUBloombergCtr. Leading this course are former CDC Director @RWalensky, former HHS Assistant Secretary for Preparedness and Response Dawn O’Connell, and Senior Scholars @C_R_Watson & @skirkell. Register for the course here: https://t.co/xTRJlsIr8h

    227424.9K viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 2026

    Last week, the Center’s Emerging Leaders in Biosecurity (#ELBI) Fellowship met in DC for the first time this year. These talented Fellows will deepen their expertise, expand their network, and build their leadership skills through a series of events coordinated by our Center. https://t.co/FiEjiYDuMD

    209403.3K viewsView on X
  • May 13, 2026

    📢Interested in contributing to the SPEAR repository? Visit the SPEAR website and explore our submission guide to discover how to share your materials with the SPEAR repository and become a vital part of our community!

    225503.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 2025

    At the 2025 #ELBI Fall Workshop, fellows had the chance to connect with colleagues in Geneva. This closing event brought together the #biosecurity community, and we look forward to working with this group of leaders! Learn more: https://t.co/vm2KfDTOiy https://t.co/lDuhFGPAxK

    188515.3K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#elbi#biosecurity#healthsecurity

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 48 interactions against 687K followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 0.515% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.35% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 735 interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #elbi, #biosecurity, #healthsecurity. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security's engagement rate on X?
Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (@BSPH_CHS) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 687,487 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security sits above the 10th percentile of the 37,996 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BSPH_CHS have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @BSPH_CHS post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security (@BSPH_CHS) Engagement Rate - 0.007% | PlayerSells