Back to @BSCNews's profile

BSCN engagement report

@BSCNews - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 957 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.009%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
0.953%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
0.98%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
128
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
34.73/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 128 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 957 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.953% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.978% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 34.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 957 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 198x its own typical post.

Measured over 957 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #strategy.

Compared with accounts its own size

BSCN's engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, BSCN sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 446 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 2026198x their median

    With CLARITY stalled, I expect the SEC, CFTC, and Treasury to advance rules under existing law, banks to expand Bitcoin custody and loans against it, and more capital to favor Bitcoin and digital credit. GENIUS supports stablecoin adoption. Progress need not wait for Congress.

    22K2.4K785184895K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026115x their median

    America is winning the crypto race. CLARITY gets us over the line. https://t.co/PkILSJfZjf

    13K1.5K473163472K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202692x their median

    In America, you don’t need a license to discuss Bitcoin, advocate for it, or publicly recommend owning it. Bitcoin is a commodity, not a security. Fraud and manipulation are illegal. Bitcoin advocacy is free speech.

    10K97251888451K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202685x their median

    Circle 🤝 @ChelseaFC USDC is coming to global football. Circle is proud to partner with Chelsea FC, one of the most recognized football clubs in the world. Beginning with the 2026/27 season, Circle and USDC will appear on the front of Chelsea’s Men’s, Women’s, and Academy shirts. The global game. The global digital dollar. https://t.co/9mgDrYjd5m

    8.6K1.5K4703111.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202679x their median

    When a crypto exchange goes bankrupt today, customers are forced to get in line behind lawyers and creditors with low priority in hopes of maybe recouping a fraction of their assets. The Clarity Act ensures consumers’ assets are protected just like they would be with traditional finance. By making digital commodities customer property, my bill ensures people get their funds back first.

    8.6K1.1K29762253K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202653x their median

    Keep your eye on the ₿all. https://t.co/2n7zWWU6xm

    5.7K50750767402K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 202652x their median

    ‼️ BREAKING: The threat actors who targeted Revolut with information-demand emails are now posting sensitive customer data, including that of high-profile clients such as tennis player Shevchenko and Römer, CEO of Gamdom/Skinscom. They want Revolut to pay up. They say they'll release more messages, data and insights into how the Revolut team operates. They're accusing Revolut of handing over sensitive information to countries outside its jurisdiction. They accuse the company of negligence around privacy and the exposure of sensitive information.

    5.3K7712643152.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 202647x their median

    Quick reminder: the world's government debt is coming onchain. And it's choosing Stellar. https://t.co/nyClPbuK6D

    4.6K1.1K181189810K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202643x their median

    BREAKING: 🇺🇸 President Trump and the White House are actively pushing Senators to pass the Crypto Clarity act today. Voting will start in 9 hours.

    4.9K39518631217K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202640x their median

    JUST IN: $800 billion asset manager Bernstein predicts Bitcoin will hit $150,000 by mid-2027. https://t.co/w2hrUzdcQ3

    4.4K41927150352K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#strategy

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 128 interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 957 original posts, its engagement rate beats 33% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.953% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.978% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 34.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 957 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 198x its own typical post.

What is BSCN's engagement rate on X?
BSCN (@BSCNews) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 957 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,374,168 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, BSCN sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @BSCNews have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 33% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @BSCNews post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 34.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going