BSCN Newswire engagement report
@BSCNWire - 571K followers on X
Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 571K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 0.191% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.916% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 804x its own typical post.
Measured over 56 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
BSCN Newswire's engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, BSCN Newswire sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,396 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.003% |
| 25th percentile | 0.022% |
| 50th percentile | 0.127% |
| 75th percentile | 0.604% |
| 90th percentile | 2.32% |
| 99th percentile | 83.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 14% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 57% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 14% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 57% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 328 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 27, 2026804x their median
Crazy how this video crashed the tech job market https://t.co/sxLhHCBkLa
- Jan 26, 2025151x their median
If ICE has 90,000 employees, and all we are asking for is 10,000 deportations a day, that’s 9 agents per illegal. More than enough to cover investigation, apprehension and removal. What are they all waiting for?
- Sep 10, 202657x their median
Being top holder of coins and getting thousands a day in dividends to not nuke on your head is an incredible tech and I think we should adopt this technology way further.
- Sep 16, 202622x their median
I’ve been thinking about building something for @PiCoreTeam $Pi network for a while. This comes off the heals of @BSCNews pi browser app being the top staked dev app in the studio section: I'm thinking about building something for the Pi community and I want your honest input before I write a single line of code. The problem: if you build a Pi app right now, almost nobody finds it unless you're already at the top of the staking list. Great apps get buried. Builders with real communities have no way to prove it. So here's the idea. One app that brings the whole ecosystem together: - A directory of every Pi dapp, new and established, updated constantly - Pi Network data and tools in one place: wallet lookups, staking info, ecosystem stats, alerts - Verified Pi votes. Builders rally their own community to vote their app up. Votes tied to real, verified Pioneers, not bots - Sponsored slots. If a builder wants a featured placement, they can pay for it, and it's clearly labeled as sponsored so rankings stay honest - A "new this week" section so fresh launches actually get seen The goal is simple: make discovery fair, give builders a way to get in front of Pioneers, and give Pioneers one place to see what's actually being built. This is a fact finding mission. Nothing is built yet. I want to know: 1. Would you use this? 2. Builders: would you pay for a featured slot or a verified listing? 3. What tools or data would you want in it that you can't get today? 4. What would make you NOT trust the rankings? Reply or DM me. If the support is there, I'll build it. If not, I'd rather know now.
- Aug 29, 202617x their median
The question of what actually gives a token value is the one most projects skip straight past, and hitpaal gives it a whole chapter in his Pioneer brief rather than a line on the way to price. I'd push it one step further, because value tends to show up only where a token is the way you pay for something people already want, which is the part $PI is still working through. https://t.co/DWduWx4eCh
- Aug 26, 202611x their median
Pi never needed to invent a consensus from scratch, which is the argument in a Pioneer brief from iamwonn, and it usually gets thrown at $PI as a knock rather than read as a design choice. Novel consensus is where chains lose two years and a security budget, so borrowing something proven leaves the hard problem where it actually is, which is app usage.
- Aug 28, 20267.7x their median
An economy needs holders and spenders at once, and it feels like $PI has a lot more of the first than the second right now, which iamwonn treats as a balance problem rather than a loyalty test. I would push that further, since a network where almost nobody spends never really finds out what its own token is worth. https://t.co/TVen4ZxPqo
- Aug 18, 20266.3x their median
Two new real estate deals are live on @asx_capital: BVT - 7.3% APR GAA- 5.4% APR Buy them now: https://t.co/xGdUUr7q9I
- Aug 25, 20266.2x their median
$PLUME puts KYC, AML and sanctions screening in the protocol layer instead of leaving every app to bolt its own version on, which is the fork every compliant chain hits eventually. $PI took that bet early by doing identity at the network level, so apps built on it never had to solve KYC themselves. https://t.co/CtaqJNtLhk
- Aug 25, 20265.9x their median
hitpal1974 has a Decoding Tokenomics brief up on why liquidity can matter more than market cap, which for $PI is not an academic point. Market cap is a multiplication anyone can do with a calculator, and it says nothing about whether the next seller finds a bid, so depth is the number I'd watch.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 10 interactions against 571K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 56 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.2K times each, and 0.191% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.916% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 56 posts sampled, 14% carry an image or video and 57% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 804x its own typical post.
- What is BSCN Newswire's engagement rate on X?
- BSCN Newswire (@BSCNWire) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 56 original posts from the last 30 days against 570,628 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, BSCN Newswire sits below the 10th percentile of the 156,396 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BSCNWire have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BSCNWire post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.97 posts per day across the measured window.