Blockchain Backer engagement report
@BCBacker - 355K followers on X
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 958 interactions against 355K followers, an engagement rate of 0.27%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 68K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.
Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 6, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Blockchain Backer's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.27%, Blockchain Backer sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 12% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 59% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 12% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 59% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 159 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 22, 20265.9x their median
Ladies and Gentlemen, The breadth is open. https://t.co/JA4xctzBd7
- Jul 14, 20265.2x their median
As many of you know, my wife's mom has been battling Stage IV Pancreatic Cancer for the past 16-months. It's something I don't talk about frequently on the channel or on X. I try not to bombard you with pity me content, but rather stride forward as the leader of my family. But, it's been a major overhanging event in the background of our lives... like a dark cloud over us. It's also why I have rarely have created content on Tuesday's for over a year... Chemo days. The time has come and hospice begins today. It's been a long journey, but the train is now approaching at full speed. I do want to say that we are not surprised by this. We've seen it coming for some time. Thanks for your patience for the past year with the absence of content every day of the week. We'll get there eventually. But for moment, it'll be a little bumpy. It's a significant moment in time for my family. Prayers for them as we go through this.
- Aug 21, 20264.1x their median
It’s looking like it’s gonna flip on…
- Sep 21, 20263.8x their median
Happy 50-week moving average break week. 🎉 https://t.co/I4DKP83qel
- Aug 28, 20262.8x their median
Bitcoin "Death Cross" + Oversold RSI + RSI rise back to 56 + rising back 50-week moving average = Bottom always in. Reaction at 50-week always different, but bottom always in. https://t.co/VPCTd5CJCZ
- Sep 18, 20262.5x their median
Clarity didn’t pass and rate hike… market up. Technicals over narratives.
- Aug 19, 20262.4x their median
🚀 😂
- Sep 21, 20262.3x their median
When I go to the gym I always put my earphones in just so people think I’m listening to music and not a psychopath rawdogging it. But 75%+ of the time I never turn on any music and I’m really just being a psychopath rawdogging it.
- Aug 8, 20262.2x their median
In 2022, when the monthly MACD crossed through zero, FTX collapsed & Bitcoin hit 10.6 million coins in a loss. In 2026, when the monthly MACD crossed through zero, STRC de-pegged, Strategy sold & Bitcoin hit 10.8 million coins in a loss. In 2022, that was the bottom of TOTAL. https://t.co/XceWCzhieU
- Jul 18, 20262.2x their median
Like in 2022 after FTX collapsed, the crowd missed that it was the low for Bitcoin, expecting lower. The parallels to that time period are nearly identical right now. Technicals. Price Structure. On-chain. This parallels the bottom.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 958 interactions against 355K followers, an engagement rate of 0.27%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 68K times each, and 1.40% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 19.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.77 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 59% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.7K interactions, about 5.9x its own typical post.
- What is Blockchain Backer's engagement rate on X?
- Blockchain Backer (@BCBacker) has an engagement rate of 0.27%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 354,739 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.27%, Blockchain Backer sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @BCBacker have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @BCBacker post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.77 posts per day across the measured window.