Back to @AviationWeek's profile

Aviation Week engagement report

@AviationWeek - 338K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.004%
of 338K followers
Per impression
0.288%
4.9K views on a typical post
Reach
1.44%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
14
interactions (median)
Saved
0.021%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 338K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.288% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 409 interactions, about 29x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #airbus, #boeing, #cfm.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 3, 2026. Recurring tags: #airbus, #boeing, #cfm.

Compared with accounts its own size

Aviation Week's engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.004%, Aviation Week sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link98% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 98% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 278 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 202629x their median

    South Korea’s efforts to develop a homegrown next-generation fighter are stepping up as the country looks to keep pace with Western programs and maintain its combat aircraft design and development capabilities. https://t.co/WTDAAFoF4F

    3256661230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    U.S. Navy officials have confirmed they are assessing requirements for a Compact Air-to-Air Missile (CAAM) for extremely short-range, air-to-air intercepts. https://t.co/bQAqtTqzXo

    139284312K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20267.4x their median

    #JetZero has secured up to $100 million in financing to support the continued build of its blended wing body (BWB) demonstrator Jet1 and a future manufacturing campus in Greensboro, North Carolina. https://t.co/MVh8yHi8u0 @JetZeroAero

    8017617.6K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20266.2x their median

    GE Aerospace will develop a Mach 5 dual-mode ramjet demonstrator under the Pentagon’s #HyCAT hypersonic test program. https://t.co/dEynw9hw9c @GE_Aerospace

    7012145.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20263.2x their median

    Saab is challenging the low-cost, attritable model adopted by Sweden’s allies with a supersonic, survivable complement to #Gripen. https://t.co/pE1wqRaqVm @Saab

    3312008.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.1x their median

    🚀 @SpaceX plans to begin construction next year on a massive new spaceport in Louisiana that includes 10 launch and landing complexes for its Starship-Super Heavy launch system. https://t.co/iRb88VBk7F #SpaceX #Starship

    376108.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.7x their median

    #AerFin says a shortage of high-pressure turbine (HPT) blades is extending #CFM56 shop visits and increasing demand for spare engines. https://t.co/QhTHyJr8su @AerFinLtd https://t.co/nOLcunEJWV

    316104.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.4x their median

    Denmark finalized an order for 16 additional @LockheedMartin F-35As despite continued threats by the Trump administration over the status of Greenland and a newly revealed assembly-line fire that damaged one of its jets, a U.S. government document shows. https://t.co/b4y8A1ubKs

    266027.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.1x their median

    📸 Enjoy this sampling of early entries from this year’s Aviation Week Photo Contest. If you are an aerospace photographer, be sure to find your best work from the past year and submit your entries at https://t.co/uK3MplVohn. https://t.co/pqDGyleRNL #PhotoContest https://t.co/giJLVF0p31

    197303.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20262.0x their median

    The @USNavy is again delaying its next-generation trainer, pushing a potential award back three months as it gives competitors more time to respond to its request for proposals. https://t.co/s1PjsFik4s

    224205.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#airbus#boeing#cfm#check6#spacex

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 14 interactions against 338K followers, an engagement rate of 0.004%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 17% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.9K times each, and 0.288% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video and 98% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 409 interactions, about 29x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #airbus, #boeing, #cfm.

What is Aviation Week's engagement rate on X?
Aviation Week (@AviationWeek) has an engagement rate of 0.004%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 337,686 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.004%, Aviation Week sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AviationWeek have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 17% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AviationWeek post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going