Back to @Average_Jonas's profile

AverageJonas πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ engagement report

@Average_Jonas - 261K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.157%
of 261K followers
Per impression
2.03%
20K views on a typical post
Reach
7.72%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
411
interactions (median)
Saved
0.044%
9 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.8/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 411 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.157%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

AverageJonas πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄'s engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 63% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.157%, AverageJonas πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.696%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.696%
p902.61%
p9982.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,567 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,364 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.696%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video58% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 58% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 194 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 10, 202628x their median

    An Old School RuneScape player spent over two years catching only shrimp and anchovies to reach level 99 Fishing The grind took 4,304 hours and involved catching over 532,000 fish https://t.co/Qc3b7tpO3o

    11K3862041151.9M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202614x their median

    Closed alpha game. People will look you in the face and say Deadlock won’t be a success. https://t.co/mEkrXntTlv

    5.4K2654434205K viewsView on X
  • Mar 17, 20247.1x their median

    Had several guests at the new cabin already and they were super happy! If anyone wants to stay here in western Norway msg me for AirBNB info! :) https://t.co/Lv29EraL83

    2.8K34588911K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20265.8x their median

    Deadlock ranked feels like what I like to call Wraith Bingo. First stage is whether you or the enemy gets the Wraith player. Second stage is whether she goes 0/10 or 10/0, probably 0/10 if she's on your team! Either way you are forced to either fight and lose 5v6 all game until your Wraith hopefully outscales the other team, or ur gonna fight 6v5 all game and hope that u can finish before Thanos gathers all his infinity stones and 1v6s you. Games just feel dragged out and boring and Wraith is the problem. Her kit is so overloaded and if this was any other MOBA she would have a terrible laning stage to compromise the absurd power in her kit but instead she gets a million damage on 800 souls because for some reason the card gets 2 full charges after 1 AP. She buys Dispel Magic and doesn't get killed unless you seriously organize and communicate to stop her early but (especially in EU) the team doesn't want to talk so it's GG go next and hope Wraith is on your team this time. I experienced this for 5 hours today back to back SMILE I LOVE DEADLOCK

    2.3K516713113K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20265.1x their median

    *High Elo Deadlock players*: WE WANT CHANGE WE WANT MATCHMAKING, VISIBLE RANKS AND DRAFT AND BETTER HERO COMPS!! PEOPLE NEED TO FIGHT FOR WHAT THEY BELIEVE IN!! LESS SMURFING STACKING AND BOOSTING! *Valve adds pretty much all of this* *High Elo Deadlock players*: DOGSHIT UPDATE NOW IM ORACLE AND I CANT CLIMB BACK TO WHERE I BELONG IN MY FICTIONAL RANK WITHOUT REWARDS BECAUSE I REALIZED I HAVE TO GRIND FOR IT INSTEAD OF HITTING E6 ONCE AND STAY THERE EVERY DAY UNTIL I DIE Why are we acting like we never have experienced a soft reset before? I know most games that have soft resets have some sort of mechanic that makes u speedclimb back to ur rank but holy shit man the game is under development, every time a big update launches it is a huge step in the right direction. It’s not perfect YET, but it’s pretty good IMO. If you really dislike it, go to the forums, write constructive feedback, or maybe wait more than 24 hours before making up your mind OR take a break if u hate it that much. So many things have been added to the game that people have posted on forums, they DO listen. This crying on Twitter is getting old. Time to play Deadlock for 12 hours cya guys

    2.0K59357101K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20264.3x their median

    Returning to Valorant for my Birthday (august 20th 9am CEST) https://t.co/8wXqEAeClD

    1.6K385912124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.7x their median

    Unc still got it https://t.co/CMxYFtH8h9

    1.5K1517154K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.6x their median

    People complaining about not having 15 wins on 3 heroes because they have 2-3+ accounts. You are part of the problem and now you get to experience the consequences of being a smurfing simon. W Yoshi Also, maybe this is a hot take but if you can’t bother to win 15 games on 3 heroes you don’t sound like someome who acruslly wants to grind ranked and improve. There should be a certain hero skill expectation in a ranked match to make the game quality higher/more fair for everyone involved. I am curious how the standard mode vill evolve over time though, sounds fun to test some really silly builds there or use it as a slightly more relevant practice mode than Street Brawl

    1.4K5938859K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20263.0x their median

    Big Brain Sova Main https://t.co/5Z6xDrYaoM

    1.2K195375K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20262.4x their median

    I wish I didn't have to make this Tweet right before my Birthday Valorant stream but DO NOT WORK WITH Fuzey Designs. I paid over $1000 and I DID NOT get even close to what I ordered. It started off with a bunch of DMs like these that I didn't originally see, before a friend of mine recommended them cause I wanted new and more fancy alerts so I started talking to them. I had no reason not to trust Basim btw he is a nice guy and wanted to help a friend out, he is not to blame at all. I added saltytaco on Discord who is the contact person to do the order and we started going over in detail what I wanted my alerts to be and what the timeline was. Mind you this was June 17 and I was given a 2 weeks estimated time. We filled out an order form in detail to make sure all the full screen alert ideas were on the same page with Animations of Deadlock characters doing certain abilities but I was warned that they might not be able to fully recreate their movement, which is fair 2 weeks later I ask whats the hold up as I have recieved nothing of value and I was told there's a few delays. Another 2 weeks passed by and I learned that the animator was currently busy designing a bunch of slot machines for another client and that's why it was delayed. At this point I only had a starting soon screen which I later found out was most likely made by AI because it had a bunch of artifacts and looked really bad and had to be remade from scratch. (1/5)

    889325515235K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 411 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.157%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 20K times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.8 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 58% carry an image or video and 8% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 12K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is AverageJonas πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄'s engagement rate on X?
AverageJonas πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ (@Average_Jonas) has an engagement rate of 0.157%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 261,150 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.157%, AverageJonas πŸ‡³πŸ‡΄ sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,567 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Average_Jonas have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Average_Jonas post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going