Back to @AvailProject's profile

Avail engagement report

@AvailProject - 297K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 297K followers
Per impression
0.65%
5.7K views on a typical post
Reach
1.91%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
37
interactions (median)
Saved
0.018%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.63/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 37 interactions against 297K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.7K times each, and 0.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 65% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82 interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Avail's engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, Avail sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video88% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link6% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 88% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 6% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 260 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 20262.2x their median

    $100 if you can beat this! Just moved 5 assets from 5 different chains in under 30 seconds (~70 for the end-to-end process). If you can beat that time using any other bridge, prove it. ๐ŸŽฅ Post a screen recording. ๐Ÿ† Beat the time. ๐Ÿ’ต Win $100 USDC https://t.co/5afCZ7rtqK

    6471109.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20261.7x their median

    Nexus Rising is now live ๐Ÿ•Š๏ธ And we're here to give apps a faster, more scalable way to reach users and liquidity across the EVM ecosystem. Check out the upgrade ๐Ÿงต ๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.co/XFGRCTE6v9

    4811417.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20261.7x their median

    Every DEX wants to give its users the best available price. The challenge is accessing more execution venues without rebuilding the product or changing how users swap. With Avail Atomic and @kalqix, @QuickswapDEX is bringing this to life with a single integration. In this demo, quotes are compared and shown directly within QuickSwap. When KalqiX offers the better price, it wins the order, executes the trade, and Avail Atomic settles it atomically onchain. Watch it in action ๐Ÿ‘‡

    51632280K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.5x their median

    When we launched Avail DA in 2023, the vision extended beyond data availability: to build a verifiable interoperability layer connecting every major blockchain at scale. Acquiring Arcana helped us move faster and bring Nexus to market. Now, Nexus is ready to scale on Avail DA. The vision stayed constant. The execution kept getting better. Thatโ€™s Kaizen.

    456506.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026

    A regular swap on @QuickswapDEX can now access CLOB-grade execution from @kalqix without the user depositing funds there or changing how they trade. This is where Avail Atomic comes in. Think of it as the plumbing connecting the two and handling everything in between, from securing the funds and coordinating execution to ensuring the trade either settles fully onchain or the user gets their funds back. @mayurrelekar breaks down the whole flow ๐Ÿ‘‡

    483407.2K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 2026

    .@QuickswapDEX just became the first AMM to offer CLOB execution through Avail Atomic, without rebuilding anything. The swaps get routed to @kalqix for better pricing, and every trade either settles in full or reverts on-chain. Here's what it looks like๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.co/dqueDjN3qY

    44461190K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 2026

    Congrats! Zero-slippage bridging is live on FastBridge. For a limited time only. That means zero protocol and solver fees, just 1:1 bridging for USDC, USDT, and ETH transfers up to $500. Bridge now: https://t.co/50T5hirxau https://t.co/QNo4XdyctL

    3946110K viewsView on X
  • Jul 23, 2026

    We're live with @QuickswapDEX and @kalqix Tune in! https://t.co/HIrpbxAe2X

    339715.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 2026

    Want to stake USDC on Ethereum on @LidoFinance, but your funds are spread across multiple chains and tokens? Hereโ€™s how to bring everything together in a single transaction and put it to work, without bridging each balance one by one. Check it out ๐Ÿ‘€๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.co/aFxQn3xVt6

    444108.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026

    Nexus moves assets across chains. Avail DA makes every transaction verifiable. AVAIL powers it all. ๆ”นๅ–„ https://t.co/o6Bvph3daI

    373316.7K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 37 interactions against 297K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 28% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 5.7K times each, and 0.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.91% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 88% carry an image or video, 65% are part of a thread and 6% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82 interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post.

What is Avail's engagement rate on X?
Avail (@AvailProject) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 297,487 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, Avail sits above the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AvailProject have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 28% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AvailProject post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going