Back to @AstroTerry's profile

Terry Virts engagement report

@AstroTerry - 317K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.054%
of 317K followers
Per impression
2.28%
7.5K views on a typical post
Reach
2.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
170
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 170 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 2.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Terry Virts's engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.054%, Terry Virts sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,128 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,111 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video60% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link45% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 60% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 45% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 197 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202623x their median

    I’ll be using Apple Maps, not Google Maps. Thank you for your attention to this matter. https://t.co/lKdOLB3lva

    3.3K2873972790K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20263.4x their median

    Ukraine attacked a Russian rocket facility last night, damaging Soyuz & Progress factories. Meanwhile Russia killed and injured civilians, including a 3 mo-old baby. Per UN: July was the deadliest month for Ukrainian civilians: 437 killed & 2610 injured. https://t.co/Hr2T3GWpc0

    4691047214K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20263.3x their median

    America is at war, sailors aboard the USS Abraham Lincoln are in crisis, and our national debt is ballooning, All while Trump obsesses about a ballroom and putting his name on a building. China and Russia couldn’t be happier. https://t.co/nQ97sm2ljR

    4717423113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20263.3x their median

    Putin’s woes continue… A genuinely positive development from Ukraine, and one that deserves far more attention. 745 km² and 26 settlements returned to Ukrainian control, while Ukraine continues striking the infrastructure sustaining Russia’s war machine deep behind the front. Ukraine is still capable of creating local superiority, exploiting Russian weaknesses and, more importantly, taking ground back. 🇺🇦 Free to read👇 https://t.co/IYODWQxKy7

    41312017643K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.7x their median

    Like most American kids, Ukrainian kids went back to school this week. Only many of them were under attack, and some were killed and injured. This is me in a bomb shelter sharing photos from my spaceflight with elementary schoolers in Kyiv 2 years ago. https://t.co/ROdTqos1m5

    37090239.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20262.0x their median

    If I were president, we would have a healthcare system that doesn’t require a GoFundMe campaign to pay for your cancer treatment.

    299309110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    NASA is poised to launch a new space telescope into the cosmos, an observatory that scientists say will revolutionize our understanding of the universe and rewrite astronomy textbooks. https://t.co/JmnV2NdWtF

    1893022490K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    A great event in Houston last night with the Ukrainian consulate, a very large crowd showed up to support Ukraine. I also had the privilege of meeting these two brave soldiers, who returned home today to defend all of us from Russia’s evil war of aggression. https://t.co/wqnjCzLwxQ

    16931625.5K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    MAGA- you've been betrayed. You didn't vote for this war in Iran. For a trade war with Canada. For higher prices. To be friends with Kim Jong Un and Putin. For the president's family to make billions. This isn't what you voted for.

    17813907.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    If you want paper ballots, wouldn’t you want mail-in ballots (which are literally paper)?

    166233010K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 170 interactions against 317K followers, an engagement rate of 0.054%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 50% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.5K times each, and 2.28% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.36% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 60% carry an image or video and 45% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 23x its own typical post.

What is Terry Virts's engagement rate on X?
Terry Virts (@AstroTerry) has an engagement rate of 0.054%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 317,081 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.054%, Terry Virts sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AstroTerry have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 50% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AstroTerry post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going