Back to @AsianDaBrattt's profile

ASIAN DOLL πŸ§šπŸΎβ€β™€οΈ engagement report

@AsianDaBrattt - 2.1M followers on X

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.02%
of 2.1M followers
Per impression
0.751%
56K views on a typical post
Reach
2.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
419
interactions (median)
Saved
0.043%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
12.53/day
active 100% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 419 interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 0.751% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 12.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 156K interactions, about 227x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #glamourhands, #stuff, #that.

Measured over 62 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #glamourhands, #stuff, #that.

Compared with accounts its own size

ASIAN DOLL πŸ§šπŸΎβ€β™€οΈ's engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.02%, ASIAN DOLL πŸ§šπŸΎβ€β™€οΈ sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 156,839 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,058 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link16% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 16% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 114 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 3, 2020227x their median

    β€œNUNNADET SHIT” Drop In 4days on my Birthday!!!!!!!! πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ https://t.co/AdpPd11W33

    116K18K2.3K21KView on X
  • Nov 5, 2021109x their median

    β€œ And If I Ain’t Have My Period I Would’ve Fucked Him On The 1st Night” πŸ”₯πŸ”₯πŸ”₯ https://t.co/25ON0rNVwl

    50K8.1K3.0K3.9KView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026101x their median

    just bought at new burmese half wig off the tiktok shop https://t.co/bAs83fUzGp

    39K2.8K144246923K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202537x their median

    7 pounds 13 ounces πŸ’• Sep. 22nd Mi’Lani https://t.co/RuuQRElwtO

    24K8534802802.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202657x their median

    Family Before Anything 🧺 https://t.co/xRS6fR54KY

    23K6858983810K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 202429x their median

    you’re defending your fav’s face card, which photo are you using?

    6.8K1581.2K12K27M viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 202648x their median

    Girl Mom πŸŽ€ https://t.co/q17dh4PvQB

    20K36210877700K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 202612x their median

    Seem like the only person who survived Gucci mane label is Asian doll 😭😭😭

    8.2K4675793224K viewsView on X
  • Nov 28, 202011x their median

    Dam I really just gotta move on & live life wow dam... iight BET

    6.8K51998167View on X
  • May 14, 202410x their median

    Don’t come to me as no woman cause ima tell you I’m pregnant bitch

    5.2K1.4K95475487K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#glamourhands#stuff#that#vindicated

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 419 interactions against 2.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.02%. Measured over 62 original posts, its engagement rate beats 45% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 0.751% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.67% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 12.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 62 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 16% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 156K interactions, about 227x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #glamourhands, #stuff, #that.

What is ASIAN DOLL πŸ§šπŸΎβ€β™€οΈ's engagement rate on X?
ASIAN DOLL πŸ§šπŸΎβ€β™€οΈ (@AsianDaBrattt) has an engagement rate of 0.02%, based on the median interactions across 62 original posts from the last 30 days against 2,087,791 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.02%, ASIAN DOLL πŸ§šπŸΎβ€β™€οΈ sits above the 10th percentile of the 156,839 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AsianDaBrattt have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 45% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AsianDaBrattt post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 12.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going