Back to @ArtSeduccin1's profile

El arte de la seducción💖 engagement report

@ArtSeduccin1 - 135K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.009%
of 135K followers
Per impression
0.29%
4.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.08%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
12
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.47/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 135K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video, 23% are part of a thread and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 483 interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

El arte de la seducción💖's engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 15% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.009%, El arte de la seducción💖 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link41% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 41% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 159 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 27, 202640x their median

    Las mujeres se excitan cuando: 1. están ovulando 2. hueles bien 3. después de una conversación profunda 4. después de pasar un rato agradable contigo 5. les gusta cómo suena tu voz 6. le besas la frente y luego la miras a los ojos

    439412118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202623x their median

    Los adictos a la p0rnografía y a la m@sturbación suelen presentar las mismas características. El primero de los signos es: https://t.co/6kLA6qhLFi

    242299175K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20267.2x their median

    6 formas de volver una mujer ADICTA a ti: 1. Tarda en responder. https://t.co/94kTefwsGq

    7781011K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20266.6x their median

    El lado oscuro de la naturaleza femenina: lo que las chicas no quieren que sepas. - Hilo sobre psicología femenina - https://t.co/lzeyFoqdts

    61126016K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20265.4x their median

    10 signos de que alguien se está enamorando de ti (e intentando no mostrarlo): - Hilo de psicología - https://t.co/SmsreCCDTa

    537509.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.6x their median

    Cuando le das un excelente servicio que ya ni tiene ganas de levantarse. https://t.co/txA938wE7Y

    401204.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20263.4x their median

    Estás en una cita con una chica y ella te dice: «Seamos solo amigos y ya veremos qué pasa». Hombre débil: «¡Claro, me parece bien!» Hombre fuerte: https://t.co/9T1dttMwQp

    372117.9K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.4x their median

    Si tienes 20 kilos o más de grasa que perder en 2026, lee esto: https://t.co/spG4udi0V8

    2710406.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 20262.4x their median

    Hola @grok, transforma esta imagen en una escena humana realista https://t.co/9E3ZXKUctx

    2801010K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.0x their median

    Nivel 1: Gana dinero con tu tiempo Nivel 2: Gana dinero con tu inteligencia Nivel 3: Gana dinero con tu dinero

    212104.1K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 12 interactions against 135K followers, an engagement rate of 0.009%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 19% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 4.1K times each, and 0.29% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video, 23% are part of a thread and 41% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 483 interactions, about 40x its own typical post.

What is El arte de la seducción💖's engagement rate on X?
El arte de la seducción💖 (@ArtSeduccin1) has an engagement rate of 0.009%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 134,798 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.009%, El arte de la seducción💖 sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ArtSeduccin1 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 19% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ArtSeduccin1 post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going