Back to @AriWasserman's profile

Ari Wasserman engagement report

@AriWasserman - 70K followers on X

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.104%
of 70K followers
Per impression
0.864%
8.1K views on a typical post
Reach
12.1%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
70
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.37/day
active 7% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 70K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 0.864% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.

Measured over 52 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #hailstate.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ari Wasserman's engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.104%, Ari Wasserman sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,782 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video33% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link23% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 33% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 23% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 114 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 202679x their median

    KENTUCKY STUNS NO. 9 TEXAS A&M IN COLLEGE STATION🤯 https://t.co/swGgplij5o https://t.co/CxQgxAcGJ8

    4.8K5709795363K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202650x their median

    WATCH: South Carolina fans chant “fire Beamer” after falling to Mississippi State. (via @jaredparkertv) https://t.co/gzHHGREewL

    3.2K2004661274K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202634x their median

    WATCH: Lane Kiffin takes the field at Ole Miss for the first time since leaving for LSU👀 (via @walexander) https://t.co/9ewZljMlmF

    2.2K1011711194K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202618x their median

    This is Colorado's entrance at Northwestern. "Sounds like a fucking library" Someone go look at the score. Ok, I'll give it to you since ESPN doesn't have a ticker for some reason. Northwestern 21 Colorado 0 https://t.co/GCKzoV7PuU

    1.2K364111245K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202614x their median

    Lincoln Keinholz is a freaking dog. Two weeks ago, I legit thought he was just fine. Now I'm fantasizing about what he'd look like surrounded by the talent on Ohio State's roster. Life comes at you fast.

    8702247739K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202613x their median

    During the offseason, I made a list of the top 10 college football players. I didn't include Trinidad Chambliss on that list. I'm a moron. I'm sorry. I suck.

    8552042420K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202612x their median

    When you truly having nothing on God's green earth to lose https://t.co/6CAeaBUiN1

    821187261K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 202612x their median

    Honestly, I think LSU may need to add a few NFL players to the roster if it wants to stay in this game.

    7642817014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 202611x their median

    Five-star freshman QB Jared Curtis wins his debut as Vanderbilt's starting QB ⭐ https://t.co/Osa0vU5ZJx

    703401210774K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20264.5x their median

    We put up with courtrooms, congressional discussions, and all the other non-football nonsense the entire offseason for these moments, these games. Soak it in. This is peak sports.

    296145227K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#hailstate

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 70 interactions against 70K followers, an engagement rate of 0.104%. Measured over 52 original posts, its engagement rate beats 49% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.1K times each, and 0.864% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 7% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 52 posts sampled, 33% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 23% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.5K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.

What is Ari Wasserman's engagement rate on X?
Ari Wasserman (@AriWasserman) has an engagement rate of 0.104%, based on the median interactions across 52 original posts from the last 30 days against 69,894 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.104%, Ari Wasserman sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AriWasserman have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 49% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AriWasserman post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going