Back to @ApplesClubs's profile

Apple Club engagement report

@ApplesClubs - 94K followers on X

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.385%
of 94K followers
Per impression
3.59%
9.9K views on a typical post
Reach
10.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
357
interactions (median)
Saved
0.241%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
10:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 357 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.385%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 3.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 129x its own typical post.

Measured over 39 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Apple Club's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 77% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.385%, Apple Club sits above the 50th percentile of the 199,943 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.141% to 0.669%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.669%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 199,943 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,892 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.669%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 10:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 177 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 2026129x their median

    Apple CEOs and their iconic iPhones https://t.co/pU2tGvTj6l

    43K2.4K4993175.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202621x their median

    Tim Cook’s final day as Apple CEO. https://t.co/g1VU11Cacn

    6.8K7145543139K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 202613x their median

    Steve Jobs built the foundation. Tim Cook expanded it into an ecosystem. Which era had the bigger impact? https://t.co/znekHUyAv3

    4.3K31112346271K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 20266.0x their median

    Apple Music Icons https://t.co/JRH9563gZO

    2.0K77141058K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20265.8x their median

    Apple’s product journey under Tim Cook. https://t.co/eCJsTSBlqQ

    1.7K30961844K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20265.0x their median

    The beginning and the end of the Tim Cook iPhone era. https://t.co/zmPos8HW7E

    1.7K119181035K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20264.7x their median

    iOS 27.2 is coming with NEW features! ❤️ Redesigned Health app 🧬 Health Age & Longevity metrics 🏃 Camera-powered fitness tracking 🤖 5 new Siri AI languages 🚗 Customizable CarPlay Ultra themes 📺 Apple TV profiles & parental controls 🤟 Sign Language support in Apple TV 🌐 FaceTime Live Interpreter support 🕐 Compact AM/PM indicators in Clock 🎵 Apple Music black accents 🧠 Multiple app exclusions for Siri 🇪🇺 Expanded EU tracking prompts 🎙️ Podcast new episodes & Continue Playing

    1.5K14222590K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20264.7x their median

    Apple’s rumored iPhone 20 Pro could be a major redesign 👀 • Curved-glass display • No camera cutout • Under-display Face ID • Tandem OLED • Even thinner bezels • A22 Pro 1.4nm chip • 200MP telephoto camera • iPhone Air-inspired cooling https://t.co/GuzVUz6Tmt

    1.5K1253110120K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 20264.5x their median

    The iPhone 20 Pro Max could be a BIG design change. 👀 • No Dynamic Island • No camera cutout • Curved glass • 7” display • 6,000mAh battery 🔋 https://t.co/LvETU5XyXy

    1.4K124381155K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.0x their median

    John Ternus officially takes over as Apple CEO tomorrow, September 1, succeeding Tim Cook after 15 years at the helm. https://t.co/A2KkYSy3jd

    1.2K16410423K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 357 interactions against 94K followers, an engagement rate of 0.385%. Measured over 39 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.9K times each, and 3.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 39 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 129x its own typical post.

What is Apple Club's engagement rate on X?
Apple Club (@ApplesClubs) has an engagement rate of 0.385%, based on the median interactions across 39 original posts from the last 30 days against 93,574 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.385%, Apple Club sits above the 50th percentile of the 199,943 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ApplesClubs have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ApplesClubs post?
Most posts go out around 10:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going