Back to @AnythingLFC_'s profile

Anything Liverpool engagement report

@AnythingLFC_ - 389K followers on X

Measured over 121 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.211%
of 389K followers
Per impression
3.10%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
6.78%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
819
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.8/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 819 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 121 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 3.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 121 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 154x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lfc, #ucl, #livatm.

Measured over 121 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #lfc, #ucl, #livatm.

Compared with accounts its own size

Anything Liverpool's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.211%, Anything Liverpool sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video74% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link5% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 152 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 31, 2026154x their median

    ⌛️ https://t.co/n6zL2tBySJ

    107K14K1.7K3.7K17M viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202649x their median

    🚨🔵⚪️ EXCL: Manchester City made again contact with Iliman Ndiaye’s agents today as Gakpo deal is in danger. Liverpool do not rule out to keep Cody Gakpo if they can’t find replacement. Ndiaye’s move to Tottenham is not done yet with Richarlison doubts over Everton return. https://t.co/dR8Tbb7H8i

    35K2.2K8621.5K6.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202624x their median

    Manchester City were first informed that they had been found guilty of more than 100 breaches of the Premier League's financial rules in the summer. Sources told ESPN club chiefs were initially made aware of the findings of the independent panel in July. It was followed by an aggressive approach in the summer transfer window, during which seven senior signings arrived at the Etihad Stadium at a cost of more than £450 million… https://t.co/0fhHi2geUd @RobDawsonESPN

    15K2.7K5109325.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202623x their median

    Iraola: "Lewis lad get on pitch and just press" Lewis Koumas: https://t.co/KpebRxcATW

    18K1.1K9967776K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202615x their median

    And they said Mo Salah lost a yard of pace 😳😳 Look at him go ⚡️ https://t.co/FP4aFhlDnd

    12K24474281.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202614x their median

    Munoz not stepping on the liverbird ❤️ https://t.co/aDxM24oJip

    11K4004916279K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202613x their median

    Steven Gerrard when told Llorente named his dog Anfield as he’s scored so many goals there. “Might call mine Goodison” 😂😂😂😂

    10K4663227223K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202611x their median

    Bradley Barcola 📸🇫🇷 https://t.co/w6U6D0qJI2

    8.5K28369129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202610x their median

    This is why it’s important to have leaders in the squad. Van Dijk did the same thing to Isak last week. https://t.co/IcnHlz90mL

    8.1K31511984K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20269.4x their median

    Jurgen Klopp & Tsimikas reunion ♥️ https://t.co/x6EWW9NsBR

    7.4K3129766K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lfc#ucl#livatm#nationsleague#pl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 819 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 121 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 3.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 121 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 154x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lfc, #ucl, #livatm.

What is Anything Liverpool's engagement rate on X?
Anything Liverpool (@AnythingLFC_) has an engagement rate of 0.211%, based on the median interactions across 121 original posts from the last 30 days against 389,049 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.211%, Anything Liverpool sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AnythingLFC_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AnythingLFC_ post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.8 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going