Anything Liverpool engagement report
@AnythingLFC_ - 389K followers on X
Measured over 121 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 819 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 121 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 3.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 121 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 154x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lfc, #ucl, #livatm.
Measured over 121 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #lfc, #ucl, #livatm.
Compared with accounts its own size
Anything Liverpool's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 79% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.211%, Anything Liverpool sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 74% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 5% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 74% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 5% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 152 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 2026154x their median
⌛️ https://t.co/n6zL2tBySJ
- Aug 31, 202649x their median
🚨🔵⚪️ EXCL: Manchester City made again contact with Iliman Ndiaye’s agents today as Gakpo deal is in danger. Liverpool do not rule out to keep Cody Gakpo if they can’t find replacement. Ndiaye’s move to Tottenham is not done yet with Richarlison doubts over Everton return. https://t.co/dR8Tbb7H8i
- Sep 29, 202624x their median
Manchester City were first informed that they had been found guilty of more than 100 breaches of the Premier League's financial rules in the summer. Sources told ESPN club chiefs were initially made aware of the findings of the independent panel in July. It was followed by an aggressive approach in the summer transfer window, during which seven senior signings arrived at the Etihad Stadium at a cost of more than £450 million… https://t.co/0fhHi2geUd @RobDawsonESPN
- Sep 9, 202623x their median
Iraola: "Lewis lad get on pitch and just press" Lewis Koumas: https://t.co/KpebRxcATW
- Sep 9, 202615x their median
And they said Mo Salah lost a yard of pace 😳😳 Look at him go ⚡️ https://t.co/FP4aFhlDnd
- Sep 10, 202614x their median
Munoz not stepping on the liverbird ❤️ https://t.co/aDxM24oJip
- Sep 9, 202613x their median
Steven Gerrard when told Llorente named his dog Anfield as he’s scored so many goals there. “Might call mine Goodison” 😂😂😂😂
- Aug 31, 202611x their median
Bradley Barcola 📸🇫🇷 https://t.co/w6U6D0qJI2
- Sep 10, 202610x their median
This is why it’s important to have leaders in the squad. Van Dijk did the same thing to Isak last week. https://t.co/IcnHlz90mL
- Sep 28, 20269.4x their median
Jurgen Klopp & Tsimikas reunion ♥️ https://t.co/x6EWW9NsBR
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 819 interactions against 389K followers, an engagement rate of 0.211%. Measured over 121 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 3.10% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.78% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 121 posts sampled, 74% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 126K interactions, about 154x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lfc, #ucl, #livatm.
- What is Anything Liverpool's engagement rate on X?
- Anything Liverpool (@AnythingLFC_) has an engagement rate of 0.211%, based on the median interactions across 121 original posts from the last 30 days against 389,049 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.211%, Anything Liverpool sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AnythingLFC_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AnythingLFC_ post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.8 posts per day across the measured window.