Back to @AnthonyLGargano's profile

Anthony Gargano engagement report

@AnthonyLGargano - 80K followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.05%
of 80K followers
Per impression
0.428%
9.3K views on a typical post
Reach
11.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
40
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.4/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 0.428% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 407x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026. Recurring tag: #eagles.

Compared with accounts its own size

Anthony Gargano's engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 20% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.05%, Anthony Gargano sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.141%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,342 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,901 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video97% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link17% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 17% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 189 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 24, 2026407x their median

    OUR LIVE REACTION... LEBRON JAMES IS A SIXER!! https://t.co/rJbxNv2uTJ

    15K78111261442K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202635x their median

    Andrew Painter's stuff was the nastiest in the sport last night, a 111 proStuff+, and the box score did not care. Five runs and two homers on it over 5.0 innings. Tarik Skubal graded next at 109, Trevor Rogers at 106. https://t.co/nzLu7kksV2

    1.3K602732189K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202618x their median

    Vic Fangio shut it down last week, but moving Cooper DeJean to safety and playing Kenny Moore in the slot will have to be brought up. "The hole in this defense is safety" - @BaldyNFL Baldy Sizzli Reel | @Wawa https://t.co/O0lD0StfT8

    62853181050K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202614x their median

    "It was flawless." -@BaldyNFL on Jalen Hurts' game-winning drive https://t.co/NtIhq1bRdA

    507344429K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202611x their median

    What is Vic Fangio message to the Eagles' defense this week? "Oh yeah he about to go off...he gonna call us out... he's gonna point out all that stuff" @brandongraham55 on Vic Fangio's preperation ahead of MNF against the Bears https://t.co/oIRoVLMQPR

    408275014K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 202611x their median

    For the love of God please stop showing Dalton on the sidelines

    3791533113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202610x their median

    "He couldn't have been better... ...he looked leaner, he looked faster... ...he's 100% bought in" - @BaldyNFL on Jalen Hurts and the most impressive part of Eagles training camp https://t.co/nzSSK2iDos

    378293340K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.3x their median

    What's the Baldy prediction for the Dallas Cowboys? "They still gotta put this thing together... ...but my guess is the offense should be very good..." -@BaldyNFL on the Cowboys and the many distractions in Dallas https://t.co/U7PqZ2LSW6

    340237227K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20269.3x their median

    "Zack Baun was the best defensive player I saw all week... ...the guy just does't miss" -@BaldyNFL on Eagles' boom and busts defensive players in week 1 https://t.co/ONbMKKdP9h

    341207230K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20269.1x their median

    "If A.J. Brown was a good soldier and they don't have to worry about replacing him... ...they're probably able to draft an offensive lineman earlier..." @Bo_Wulf on the effect of the A.J. Brown situation on the Eagles O-Line https://t.co/AYB6CuRPgS

    32211257157K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#eagles

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 40 interactions against 80K followers, an engagement rate of 0.05%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 37% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.3K times each, and 0.428% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 11.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 17% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 407x its own typical post.

What is Anthony Gargano's engagement rate on X?
Anthony Gargano (@AnthonyLGargano) has an engagement rate of 0.05%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 80,143 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.05%, Anthony Gargano sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,342 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AnthonyLGargano have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 37% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AnthonyLGargano post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going