Anon2World🏴Ⓐ engagement report
@Anon2World - 62K followers on X
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 62K followers, an engagement rate of 0.094%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.502% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.7K interactions, about 130x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.094%, Anon2World🏴Ⓐ sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 0% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 233 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 29, 2026130x their median
Far-right commentator Alex Jones calls for Trump’s immediate impeachment: “I’m calling for it right now: 25th Amendment, impeachment, whatever needs to happen to get this front and center, to get control of our country” https://t.co/CMsaNQwXqt
- Mar 29, 2026123x their median
Facts are kryptonite to conservatives https://t.co/UuKEmURRyb
- Dec 13, 202414x their median
Insane? No, @ericweinstein, it's just people misinterpreting what they see in the sky combined with a lazy sensationalist media and a gov that is aware that sometimes drones are used for bad things but also not really familiar with this kind of flap. It's simple and stupid.
- Dec 11, 202412x their median
🚨 Congressman Jeff Van Drew says it is an Iranian "mothership" that is off the coast of New Jersey launching drones, and he believes they should be shot down. https://t.co/UPTgyy4ov3
- Dec 13, 20242.3x their median
There is a lot of stupidity and politicking going on around the "drone" issues that are happening in multiple states. It's not just New Jersey anymore. Iran does NOT have the capability to have a carrier (mothership 🤣) filled with drones - nor does it have the capability to create drones that can stay up in the air for hours on end. Hell we don't even have that capability. No one knows what these things are. And no, I'm not saying they're aliens - but we certainly need to start asking hard questions if these things are shutting down drones going up to look at them, and they're messing with cameras trying to film them. Data collection is a must, and that should be the goal of not just the government but also the people on the ground witnessing these so called "drones". Republicans seem to be losing their shit and grasping on to any conspiracy theory they can - which is dangerous. They're blaming Iran with zero proof - and if it was Iran we certainly would have lots of intel on these things. Yet we do not! Stop panicking. Take a deep breath. Don't trust the government, don't trust Republicans, don't trust Democrats - they all have agendas about this issue and will lie to you. They do not know what frequency these things are on; they cannot detect any known frequency. They cannot determine a point of origin (some reports say they come and go from the ocean), they cannot determine a point of return either... they just 'disappear'. So rather than freak out and become scared, deal with this shit logically. Use science and instruments at your disposal to catalog what you are seeing. Chill out everyone. Rational minds prevail, irrational minds cause chaos and strife. Acting irrationally could inadvertently trigger something we're not ready to deal with.
- Dec 13, 20242.1x their median
Strange aircraft / drone in NJ posted to reddit - chevron shaped - no tail. cc: @Caspersight Reddit link to video: https://t.co/j6vsxvLvLq https://t.co/VrduRQ631k
- Feb 7, 20242.1x their median
Anonymous: A Warning - Fascism Has Arrived https://t.co/j4RHsJ5twL
- Jan 2, 20251.9x their median
Maybe people just are not interested in Anonymous anymore - sometimes things just fade away. I've put my heart and soul into the collective for so many years now - through making videos, maintaining websites and social media - and I don't get paid, it's all out of pocket for me So if there really is a lack of interest, I'm not sure what I'm holding on for. Maybe in some way I have hope - perhaps I'm optimistic that more people will wake up. I've seen the ebb and flows of Anonymous' popularity wane and increase so much over the past 12 years - it's ridiculous. So many people have moved on... and sometimes I wonder what keeps me stuck to the idea of what could be - of what could arise from Anonymous... because no matter who you are, you want a better world - it's just that everyone has a different vision of what a better world is. Some people see a better world in having equality, some people see a better world in having disharmony. I don't know what the future holds, but whatever happens I surely hope humanity rises above it's flaws and becomes great. A divided humanity will never be great. Peace.
- Sep 2, 2026
The hacktivism of the 2010s is dead. There are too many informational systems that can easily spy and decrypt everything you're doing. Anonymous knows this, that's why you don't see a lot of people dropping shit online about hacks.
- Dec 17, 2024
ANONYMOUS: DRONE MADNESS / ALIEN INVASION?! https://t.co/QILY48D8OS https://t.co/x2pHVrdG3r
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 59 interactions against 62K followers, an engagement rate of 0.094%. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.502% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 18.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.7K interactions, about 130x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Anon2World🏴Ⓐ's engagement rate on X?
- Anon2World🏴Ⓐ (@Anon2World) has an engagement rate of 0.094%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 62,401 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.094%, Anon2World🏴Ⓐ sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,665 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Anon2World have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @Anon2World post?
- Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.1 posts per day across the measured window.