Back to @Angry_Staffer's profile

Angry Staffer engagement report

@Angry_Staffer - 566K followers on X

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
1.25%
of 566K followers
Per impression
4.72%
150K views on a typical post
Reach
26.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
7.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.1%
149 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.53/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 7.1K interactions against 566K followers, an engagement rate of 1.25%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 150K times each, and 4.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

Measured over 15 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 12, 2026. Recurring tag: #makeorwellfictionagain.

Compared with accounts its own size

Angry Staffer's engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 89% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.25%, Angry Staffer sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.671% to 2.53%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,449 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video40% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 40% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 219 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 19, 20266.3x their median

    All of these Natalie Harp stories are leaking for one reason: Someone in the West Wing is sick of Harp’s shit. Probably just a coincidence that it’s all happening as Leavitt is leaving.

    39K5.1K458118582K viewsView on X
  • Oct 5, 20266.2x their median

    Doxycycline treats PLAGUE with a 97% SURVIVAL RATE. 29 of 30 survived in a randomized clinical trial. This is not the Middle Ages.

    34K8.1K1.2K5111.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20266.0x their median

    If Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and Elon Musk all agree that we have to slow down - and now - something serious clearly happened with a frontier AI model. Journalists should be digging in to this. We aren’t getting the whole story here.

    35K6.6K716226625K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20262.8x their median

    It’s been almost 90 days since the American people have seen or heard from Mitch McConnell. We’re still paying his salary.

    16K3.3K29171120K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.7x their median

    I’m loving the “well akshually he didn’t REALLY mean let Iran take out Los Angeles and San Diego” excuses today. Cool. Explain the assholes in the crowd who thought it was fucking hilarious. Deplorables wasn’t strong enough.

    16K2.4K41032150K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.6x their median

    🚨BREAKING: President Donald Trump signaled Tuesday he’s willing to declare a national security emergency in an attempt to take over American elections. https://t.co/uosyDUTWN4

    11K5.4K1.6K7471.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20262.6x their median

    JUST IN: Trump’s proposed stay-at-home parent benefit would reportedly require recipients to be married & have one spouse working 35+ hours a week, with benefits averaging around $9,000 per child.

    17K7467272811.9M viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20262.4x their median

    I’m telling you 70-80% of the pro Trump content on this app is fake. It’s ran by bots and fake accounts. https://t.co/z5FFULRWlz

    15K2.0K36984219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.2x their median

    Trump: tariffs don’t raise prices MAGA: yeah! tariffs don’t raise prices, dumb libs Trump: I’m going to suspend tariffs on imported beef to lower prices MAGA: suspending tariffs will lower prices, dumb libs

    13K2.3K9345196K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20262.1x their median

    Pillow guy lost his primary and Klobuchar won by a million? Please, tell me more about the power of a Trump endorsement

    13K1.3K931198K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#makeorwellfictionagain

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 7.1K interactions against 566K followers, an engagement rate of 1.25%. Measured over 15 original posts, its engagement rate beats 97% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 150K times each, and 4.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 26.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 15 posts sampled, 40% carry an image or video and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 6.3x its own typical post.

What is Angry Staffer's engagement rate on X?
Angry Staffer (@Angry_Staffer) has an engagement rate of 1.25%, based on the median interactions across 15 original posts from the last 30 days against 566,049 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.25%, Angry Staffer sits above the 75th percentile of the 201,449 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Angry_Staffer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 97% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Angry_Staffer post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.53 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going