Angry Tom engagement report
@AngryTomtweets - 150K followers on X
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 150K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.735% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 77x its own typical post.
Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Angry Tom's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.031%, Angry Tom sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 208 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Apr 3, 202677x their median
this kid has racked up 650M views on TT turning himself into whatever celebrity his followers request > first video was uploaded 40 days ago > since then: 80 videos, 650M views, 768K followers > one format, recycled over and over and the wildest part? he’s not even real https://t.co/hXUhA7x4hc
- Aug 24, 202669x their median
This is Wan3.0. Simple Input. Smart Creation. Where Imagination Meets Reality. Wan3.0 is now generally available. 🎉 Launch offer: Get 30% off Wan3.0 (Standard) on Alibaba Cloud Model Studio and Qwen Cloud from August 23 to September 23. https://t.co/GVogLtvzjK
- Aug 18, 202631x their median
Storytelling in the modern era. The future of filmmaking is only limited by imagination. https://t.co/39he8cMWvz
- Aug 16, 202626x their median
plot twist. wait for it... https://t.co/B13yX7pjPu
- Aug 27, 202621x their median
Best use of AI I've seen this year. https://t.co/pCHIkB87ea
- Sep 5, 20266.9x their median
Real footage vs. AI https://t.co/iPoLaeF1x6
- Sep 3, 20264.7x their median
GPT-6 Astra vs. Fable 5.1 an ink wash animation generated with Higgsfield Seedance 2.5 https://t.co/KGeTlt3ALN
- Aug 11, 20264.5x their median
LTX just shipped one of its biggest open-source upgrades yet, a fully open world model LTX-2.5 is here with sharper video, native multi-shot generation, better prompt understanding and a much stronger distilled model. Open weights. Runs on your own hardware Here’s what’s new↓ https://t.co/Xs33KNORXY
- Sep 1, 20263.8x their median
AI slop era is over https://t.co/S1FugE8hE0
- Sep 23, 20261.9x their median
We’re glad to announce: ZenMux Studios is now live. ✨ Chat → Image → Video, all in one connected workspace. 💬 Think, research, and write in Chat Studio 🎨 Create and refine visuals in Image Studio 🎬 Turn those visuals into motion in Video Studio Switch models, not your workflow. 👉 https://t.co/k5cCjUoOlP
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 47 interactions against 150K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.4K times each, and 0.735% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.6K interactions, about 77x its own typical post.
- What is Angry Tom's engagement rate on X?
- Angry Tom (@AngryTomtweets) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 150,154 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.031%, Angry Tom sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AngryTomtweets have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AngryTomtweets post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.