Back to @Angry82pigeon's profile

๐Ÿ’™๋‹Œํƒฑ๋Œ€์™•โค๏ธ (์ƒํƒœ : ๋”˜๋ƒ ๋ƒ ์ด) engagement report

@Angry82pigeon - 279K followers on X

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.012%
of 279K followers
Per impression
0.294%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
34
interactions (median)
Saved
0.017%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.294% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 1355x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ใ‚ฝใƒ•ใƒˆใ‚ฏใƒชใƒผใƒ ใ‚ทใƒŸใƒฅใƒฌใƒผใ‚ฟใƒผ, #poipiku, #ใƒžใƒ“ใƒขใƒ.

Measured over 34 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #ใ‚ฝใƒ•ใƒˆใ‚ฏใƒชใƒผใƒ ใ‚ทใƒŸใƒฅใƒฌใƒผใ‚ฟใƒผ, #poipiku, #ใƒžใƒ“ใƒขใƒ.

Compared with accounts its own size

๐Ÿ’™๋‹Œํƒฑ๋Œ€์™•โค๏ธ (์ƒํƒœ : ๋”˜๋ƒ ๋ƒ ์ด)'s engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 17% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, ๐Ÿ’™๋‹Œํƒฑ๋Œ€์™•โค๏ธ (์ƒํƒœ : ๋”˜๋ƒ ๋ƒ ์ด) sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video47% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 47% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 49 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 19, 20261355x their median

    ๅ˜˜ใคใใŒใ€ๆœ€ๅพŒใซใคใ„ใŸๅ˜˜ #ใ‚ทใƒซใƒใƒผใƒžใ‚ฆใƒณใƒ†ใƒณ https://t.co/co4KvOlO6q

    41K4.2K1354298.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026437x their median

    ์ง์Šน์‹œ๋ผ ์‹œ๊ทธ๋ฌธ๋“œ https://t.co/xzjNwE0Ga2

    14K1.0K37100K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026425x their median

    ์ง€ํฌ..โ™€๏ธ https://t.co/2p7tVLEw2u

    14K9111115302K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 2026416x their median

    ์ƒ๊ณ„๋ฌด์ฑ… ์—”๋”ฉ๊ธฐ๋…(ํ•œ์ฐธ๋Šฆ์Œ) ใ…‹ใ…‹ใ…‹ ์ง„์‹œ๊ทธ ๋ฐˆํŒจ๋Ÿฌ๋”” https://t.co/00Ho0WFFsr

    13K1.1K421122K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 2026282x their median

    ๋นก๊ทธ๋ฌธ๋“œ https://t.co/nyfwJiBO93

    9.2K4305466K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026232x their median

    Dead of night https://t.co/Rbj9QSc3P6

    7.5K3451167K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 2026163x their median

    ๆœ€่ฟ‘ใฎ็ตตๆใใƒ„ใƒผใƒซใ€ ้€ฒๅŒ–ใฎใ‚นใƒ”ใƒผใƒ‰ๆ—ฉใ™ใŽใฆๆญฃ็›ดใคใ„ใฆใ„ใ‘ใชใ„ใงใ™ใ€‚ ไพฟๅˆฉใซใชใฃใฆใ‚‹ใฎใฏๅคงๆ„Ÿ่ฌใชใ‚“ใ ใ‘ใฉใ€ใ€Œใƒฌใ‚คใƒคใƒผใ‚’้‡ใญใฆๅœฐ้“ใซใ‚ฌใ‚ทใ‚ฌใ‚ทๆใใ€ใฃใฆใ„ใ†ใ‚ดใƒชใƒฉใฟใŸใ„ใชๆใๆ–นใ—ใ‹ใ‚‚ใ†่„ณใŒๅ—ใ‘ไป˜ใ‘ใชใ„ใ€‚ ๅŒใ˜็ตถๆป…ๅฑๆƒง็จฎใฎ็ตตๆใใ•ใ‚“ใ„ใพใ›ใ‚“ใ‹๏ผŸ

    4.6K76147159303K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 2026142x their median

    ํ•œ๋•Œ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ •์ง€ ์†Œ์žฌ ๋งˆ์ด๋ถ์ด์—ˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ์•„์ฃผ ์ฐฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์ˆœ์ˆ˜ํ•œ ํŠธ์นœ์ด โ€œ์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ์ •์ง€์‹œ์ผœ์„œ ๋ญํ•˜๋‚˜์š”?โ€๋ผ๊ณ  ํ•ด์„œ ๋ˆˆ๋ฌผ ํ˜๋ ธ๋˜ ๊ธฐ์–ต์ด ์žˆ์Œ

    2.2K1.8K0816722K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 2026116x their median

    ์˜คํƒ€์ฟ ๋ผ๋ฉด ์•ผ์‹œ๊พธ๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ”๋‹ˆ๋ณด์ด ๊ทธ๋ ค์•ผ๊ฒ ์ฃ  https://t.co/airXq1k7dv

    3.7K25831064K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026116x their median

    ํ‹ฐ์•Œ์šฉ์œผ๋กœ ๊ทธ๋ฆฐ ์‹œ๊ทธ๋ฌธ๋“œ ๐Ÿฆ๐Ÿ’› https://t.co/rdiZjqM2pA

    3.6K29041145K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ใ‚ฝใƒ•ใƒˆใ‚ฏใƒชใƒผใƒ ใ‚ทใƒŸใƒฅใƒฌใƒผใ‚ฟใƒผ#poipiku#ใƒžใƒ“ใƒขใƒ#๋ถ€์บ#ํ›ˆ์ œ์น˜ํ‚จํˆฌ์–ด

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 34 interactions against 279K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 34 original posts, its engagement rate beats 26% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 0.294% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 34 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 46K interactions, about 1355x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #ใ‚ฝใƒ•ใƒˆใ‚ฏใƒชใƒผใƒ ใ‚ทใƒŸใƒฅใƒฌใƒผใ‚ฟใƒผ, #poipiku, #ใƒžใƒ“ใƒขใƒ.

What is ๐Ÿ’™๋‹Œํƒฑ๋Œ€์™•โค๏ธ (์ƒํƒœ : ๋”˜๋ƒ ๋ƒ ์ด)'s engagement rate on X?
๐Ÿ’™๋‹Œํƒฑ๋Œ€์™•โค๏ธ (์ƒํƒœ : ๋”˜๋ƒ ๋ƒ ์ด) (@Angry82pigeon) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 34 original posts from the last 30 days against 278,545 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, ๐Ÿ’™๋‹Œํƒฑ๋Œ€์™•โค๏ธ (์ƒํƒœ : ๋”˜๋ƒ ๋ƒ ์ด) sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Angry82pigeon have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 26% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Angry82pigeon post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going