Back to @Angelo69Mathews's profile

Angelo Mathews engagement report

@Angelo69Mathews - 446K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.204%
of 446K followers
Per impression
7.17%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
2.84%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
909
interactions (median)
Saved
0.024%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.37/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 909 interactions against 446K followers, an engagement rate of 0.204%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 7.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Angelo Mathews's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 95% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.204%, Angelo Mathews sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video18% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 18% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 103 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 15, 202616x their median

    Colombo was lit tonight but India were too good for Pakistan . A convincing win by them

    15K546532139K viewsView on X
  • Mar 8, 202616x their median

    Congratulations to @BCCI far superior team tonight ! Commissoration to @BLACKCAPS they played well right throughout the tournament but was an uphill task tonight . Weldone both teams πŸ‘πŸ‘

    14K65119293K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 202614x their median

    This kid suryawanshi has absolutely no respect for bowlers ! What a talent

    12K6564410132K viewsView on X
  • Mar 9, 202614x their median

    Happy for you buddy! I know how hard you work no matter where you are ! Always a 1000% keep smashing it πŸ™Œ Bauwa #nuwansenevirathna https://t.co/Rs2RMZYtt9

    12K4494312683K viewsView on X
  • Apr 10, 202610x their median

    Rajasthan will be in this years IPL final !

    9.0K29911352145K viewsView on X
  • Feb 22, 202610x their median

    OMG! No words! Pathetic batting by srilanka. After bowling so well and no batter wanted to bat sensibly and get srilanka home ! Terrible

    8.8K40116325180K viewsView on X
  • Jun 12, 20267.7x their median

    Congratulations on an incredible career, Kane Williamson. Your class, humility, and sportsmanship have inspired cricket fans around the world. Thank you for the countless memories, remarkable innings, and exemplary leadership. Wishing you happiness, success, and fulfillment in this next chapter of life. Enjoy your well-deserved retirement, legend!

    6.8K25226254K viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20267.7x their median

    We should not play one off test with anyone! If any country doesn’t want to play more than one so be it! There’s nothing called bigger nations and test status is equal to all test playing nations .You can’t have 1 team playing 20 games and another playing 10 games in the same championship cycle! Generating revenue and keeping test cricket alive is two different things and you should not mix up the two !

    6.1K69714353375K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20267.6x their median

    Take a bow Sonal dinusha πŸ‘πŸ‘ what a player what temperament!! Under pressure delivers again and again for SL πŸ‘πŸ‘

    6.7K22038267K viewsView on X
  • Mar 3, 20267.1x their median

    Deeply saddened by the passing of Mr S.K sangakkara beloved father of @KumarSanga2 may he RIP πŸ™ thoughts and prayers with the entire family πŸ™

    6.2K16512210137K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 909 interactions against 446K followers, an engagement rate of 0.204%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 7.17% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.84% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.37 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 18% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 16K interactions, about 16x its own typical post.

What is Angelo Mathews's engagement rate on X?
Angelo Mathews (@Angelo69Mathews) has an engagement rate of 0.204%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 445,760 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.204%, Angelo Mathews sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Angelo69Mathews have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Angelo69Mathews post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going