Back to @AndrewScheer's profile

Andrew Scheer engagement report

@AndrewScheer - 263K followers on X

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.342%
of 263K followers
Per impression
7.18%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
4.76%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
898
interactions (median)
Saved
0.068%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 898 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.342%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 7.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cdnpoli, #labourdayclassic, #ridernation.

Measured over 20 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #cdnpoli, #labourdayclassic, #ridernation.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andrew Scheer's engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.342%, Andrew Scheer sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99119.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,536 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,995 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video95% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 95% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 277 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20267.7x their median

    OUTRAGEOUS!!! Carney tells Canadians we’ve been attacked and are at war. He won’t meet the Canadian Parliament and inform Canadians about the deal. But he’ll meet with the German, Latvian, Bulgarian (etc…) European MPs? Does he think he’s so much better than our Parliament? https://t.co/DuDR7h6K9B

    4.4K1.4K1.1K12876K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20267.6x their median

    Carney’s record in the last few weeks: ❌ Tells UAE he doesn’t have anything to invest their $70 billion in. ❌ So embarrassed about his Gordie Howe bridge deal he won’t come clean on the details. Anyone else starting to get the feeling he overhyped his abilities? https://t.co/TSPcV4rxW6

    5.1K1.3K38168124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.8x their median

    Canadians need to see the deal. The people who pay the price for the deal collapsing deserve to know why. Carney needs to recall Parliament and release the deal. https://t.co/WoK4hoNSkF https://t.co/lphys6OJZx

    4.0K9281.0K8971K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.0x their median

    A family with an average income had to pay 41.9% of its income on taxes in 2025. Do you believe you get good value for handing over almost half your paycheque? You make tough choices to balance your household budget. Your family cuts back, but Mark Carney's Liberals keep wasting money and driving up costs. Taxes take a bigger chunk from your income than you spend feeding and housing your kids. Only Conservatives will respect your hard work, cap government spending, and axe taxes so you can get ahead. Have YOUR say at https://t.co/vewKCjDGNU

    1.8K59324531123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.6x their median

    This is awful. Non-citizens shouldn’t get lighter sentences than Canadians would get. Carney voted AGAINST ending the sentencing discount for non-citizens. Conservatives believe the law should apply to everyone equally. https://t.co/pGLWYpoYBi

    1.7K4661041013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.0x their median

    Mark Carney is keeping Canadians in the dark about the trade deal. Canadians are paying all the costs, it’s only right we know exactly what happened. Meanwhile, @PierrePoilievre is pushing an economic action plan that would scrap Liberal taxes and wasteful spending and reward people for investing in Canada.

    1.3K3272231913K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20261.8x their median

    Keep in mind when reading today’s economic numbers: Carney is: Hiking the industrial Carbon tax. Keeping Trudeau’s anti-development laws Racking up bigger deficits (which drives inflation). All for what? No new major projects and the highest food inflation in the G7 and 👇 https://t.co/UsC6WaVSD3

    1.1K3391831612K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.7x their median

    Ready. Fire. Aim. Liberals already reversing counter tariffs before they take effect. Maybe if they recalled Parliament, did their research and focused on substance over grandstanding they’d get it right. https://t.co/DOpyXl6Gi9

    1.1K2172202823K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20261.5x their median

    While Carney’s tax hikes and inflation drives up prices, Conservatives are fighting to stop the tax hike on gasoline. https://t.co/LwurRj8BCB

    1.1K1791281211K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Instead of learning from his disastrous mistakes, Carney is importing them here. The fund he set up has already lost over $400 million!!! https://t.co/OgHsaSWuS5

    7873271051914K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cdnpoli#labourdayclassic#ridernation#riders

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 898 interactions against 263K followers, an engagement rate of 0.342%. Measured over 20 original posts, its engagement rate beats 82% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 7.18% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.76% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 20 posts sampled, 95% carry an image or video, 5% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 7.7x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cdnpoli, #labourdayclassic, #ridernation.

What is Andrew Scheer's engagement rate on X?
Andrew Scheer (@AndrewScheer) has an engagement rate of 0.342%, based on the median interactions across 20 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,743 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.342%, Andrew Scheer sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,536 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AndrewScheer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 82% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AndrewScheer post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going