Back to @AndrewScheer's profile

Andrew Scheer engagement report

@AndrewScheer - 262K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.323%
of 262K followers
Per impression
4.54%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
7.11%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
847
interactions (median)
Saved
0.075%
14 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.5/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 847 interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.323%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 4.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cdnpoli, #labourdayclassic, #ridernation.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #cdnpoli, #labourdayclassic, #ridernation.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andrew Scheer's engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 85% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.323%, Andrew Scheer sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link13% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 13% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 314 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 26, 20268.2x their median

    OUTRAGEOUS!!! Carney tells Canadians we’ve been attacked and are at war. He won’t meet the Canadian Parliament and inform Canadians about the deal. But he’ll meet with the German, Latvian, Bulgarian (etc…) European MPs? Does he think he’s so much better than our Parliament? https://t.co/DuDR7h6K9B

    4.4K1.4K1.1K12876K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 20268.0x their median

    Carney’s record in the last few weeks: ❌ Tells UAE he doesn’t have anything to invest their $70 billion in. ❌ So embarrassed about his Gordie Howe bridge deal he won’t come clean on the details. Anyone else starting to get the feeling he overhyped his abilities? https://t.co/TSPcV4rxW6

    5.1K1.3K38168124K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.2x their median

    Canadians need to see the deal. The people who pay the price for the deal collapsing deserve to know why. Carney needs to recall Parliament and release the deal. https://t.co/WoK4hoNSkF https://t.co/lphys6OJZx

    4.0K9281.0K8971K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.3x their median

    Canada will never be the 51st US state and will never be the 28th EU state. Carney lied about his plans for EU membership. Do they include importing all the rules and regulations that stifle growth and increase energy costs? Carney supported cancelling pipelines and higher carbon taxes when he was Trudeau’s senior economic advisor. Canadians did not ask for unelected bureaucrats in Europe to regulate our industries or dictate our economy.

    2.8K8177369458K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20265.1x their median

    Media bias on display: Carney negotiates a deal in secret with EU officials, then gets caught lying about. What does most of the Canadian media focus on? Manufacturing gossip pieces about Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre.

    3.3K6513314439K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.8x their median

    Why are there more pipelines approved in conflict zones than here in Canada? Over the last 10 years, why did energy companies pour billions worth of investments into unstable countries, while pulling out of Canada? Bad Liberal policies. Those laws remain on the books. And the politicians who authored them still sit around the cabinet table.

    2.3K5972502644K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.2x their median

    A family with an average income had to pay 41.9% of its income on taxes in 2025. Do you believe you get good value for handing over almost half your paycheque? You make tough choices to balance your household budget. Your family cuts back, but Mark Carney's Liberals keep wasting money and driving up costs. Taxes take a bigger chunk from your income than you spend feeding and housing your kids. Only Conservatives will respect your hard work, cap government spending, and axe taxes so you can get ahead. Have YOUR say at https://t.co/vewKCjDGNU

    1.8K59324531123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20262.7x their median

    This is awful. Non-citizens shouldn’t get lighter sentences than Canadians would get. Carney voted AGAINST ending the sentencing discount for non-citizens. Conservatives believe the law should apply to everyone equally. https://t.co/pGLWYpoYBi

    1.7K4661041013K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.2x their median

    Pierre is doing what any opposition leader should be. Holding the government to account here at home. Forcing the PM to show Canadians all the costs. Proposing better solutions. And while abroad, making the case for Canada. Fighting for the best possible deal for Canadians. https://t.co/08rUvlB8oA

    1.4K2971812018K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20262.2x their median

    Mark Carney is keeping Canadians in the dark about the trade deal. Canadians are paying all the costs, it’s only right we know exactly what happened. Meanwhile, @PierrePoilievre is pushing an economic action plan that would scrap Liberal taxes and wasteful spending and reward people for investing in Canada.

    1.3K3272231913K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#cdnpoli#labourdayclassic#ridernation#riders

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 847 interactions against 262K followers, an engagement rate of 0.323%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 79% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 4.54% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.12% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 8% are part of a thread and 13% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 8.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #cdnpoli, #labourdayclassic, #ridernation.

What is Andrew Scheer's engagement rate on X?
Andrew Scheer (@AndrewScheer) has an engagement rate of 0.323%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 262,080 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.323%, Andrew Scheer sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AndrewScheer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 79% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AndrewScheer post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.5 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going