Back to @AndrewPollackFL's profile

Andrew Pollack engagement report

@AndrewPollackFL - 361K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.275%
of 361K followers
Per impression
8.72%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
3.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
993
interactions (median)
Saved
0.048%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 993 interactions against 361K followers, an engagement rate of 0.275%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 8.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 2, 2026. Recurring tag: #breaking.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andrew Pollack's engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 97% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.275%, Andrew Pollack sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.499%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video22% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 22% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 155 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202544x their median

    I said it 6yrs ago after my daughter was murdered at school & I mean it today: We must #FixIt because our children are counting on us to do whatever it takes to keep them safe Gun-free zones make adults feel good,but kill our kids Cultivating mental illness (trans) is dangerous https://t.co/OEhG7kK5HB

    37K6.5K572158971K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20268.0x their median

    .@POTUS: "I'd love to have my father back." 💙 https://t.co/4g6bDuajIL

    7.0K74219436246K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 20266.9x their median

    Here is a picture of my family showing President Trump a picture of Meadow. I saw firsthand that he is a great man with a heart of gold who truly cares. The Democrats and media say the opposite, but I’m here to tell you they are totally wrong! https://t.co/flUZhvfNit

    5.8K94548432K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20265.9x their median

    Boycotting Jelly Roll and every washed-up celebrity who goes on Jimmy Kimmel to bash President Trump.

    5.4K38453830K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.9x their median

    Canada picked a trade fight with President Trump and lost the naming rights to Lake Ontario. Welcome to Lake America. 🇺🇸

    2.2K133498924K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20262.6x their median

    Men are finally speaking up

    2.4K112981991K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.5x their median

    Supreme Court just cleared the White House ballroom and military complex. Privately funded, under budget, ahead of schedule—and not one dime from taxpayers. That’s winning.

    2.2K1919212K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.4x their median

    An American won UFC Freedom 250. Now an American just won the Freedom 250 Grand Prix. America is on 🔥🇺🇸

    2.2K1438011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    Midterm elections are in 75 days. Get fired up, support Republican candidates, and hold the majorities so President Trump can deliver an amazing second half of his term. No excuses.

    9322274869.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 2026

    President Trump just signed the best deal with Venezuela. Greatest President of all time!!

    1.0K6614011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#breaking

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 993 interactions against 361K followers, an engagement rate of 0.275%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 81% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 8.72% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.16% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 22% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 44K interactions, about 44x its own typical post.

What is Andrew Pollack's engagement rate on X?
Andrew Pollack (@AndrewPollackFL) has an engagement rate of 0.275%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 360,578 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.275%, Andrew Pollack sits above the 50th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AndrewPollackFL have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 81% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AndrewPollackFL post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going