Back to @Andres_Vaca_'s profile

Andrés Vaca engagement report

@Andres_Vaca_ - 368K followers on X

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.731%
of 368K followers
Per impression
5.43%
50K views on a typical post
Reach
13.4%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.052%
26 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
20:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.731%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 5.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andrés Vaca's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.731%, Andrés Vaca sits above the 75th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.671% to 2.53%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.141%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 200,870 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.141%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 20:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 128 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 30, 20265.4x their median

    Sobre el juego de hoy: - Mateo Chávez el mejor. No le pide nada a Gallardo. - Hoy demostró Fidalgo que puede pelearle el puesto a Chávez. - Everardo muy bien en defensa. - Con Romo el equipo se vio mejor, es garantía. - La vida post Raúl Jiménez pinta difícil.

    14K26629415369K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20265.3x their median

    Sobre el partido de México: - Mora el mejor de todos. Somos muy afortunados de tenerlo. - El partido de Johan, Alvarado, Lira y Reyes, fantástico. - Fidalgo te da más que Chávez. - Obed siempre es garantía. ¿Algo más?

    14K30730612275K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20264.2x their median

    América, Guadalajara, Monterrey, Toluca, Atlas y Cruz Azul tienen unos planteles de miedo. Dirigen Milito, Mohamed, Almada, Almeyda, Paiva, Crespo, Herrera, Huiqui y Abreu. La Premier League del continente americano, señores. https://t.co/xSWFLRRcef

    11K49917326236K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.1x their median

    Pocas veces me ha dado tanto gusto un traspaso como el de Lira al Mónaco. Trabajó sin descanso para cumplir este sueño y, cuando apareció una oferta multimillonaria que habría convencido a muchos, tuvo la valentía de mantenerse firme. No tengo duda de que conquistará Francia.

    11K285609115K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20263.8x their median

    Acá les pregunto ¿Cuáles serían sus tres refuerzos para los Juegos Olímpicos? Yo la tengo clara: Johan, Lira y Quiñones.

    9.7K13636427314K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.3x their median

    Que triste lo del fichaje de Lira. Hay que decir que el menos culpable es el Cruz Azul: respetaron los tiempos y acordaron días antes del cierre. Después el manejo fue una lágrima… todo de última hora y con prisas, sumado a la mala suerte del test físico de Balogun. Día triste.

    8.6K196655210K viewsView on X
  • Aug 7, 20263.1x their median

    Si México Sub-20 vence hoy a Canadá en el Estadio Azteca, asegurará su boleto a los Juegos Olímpicos de Los Ángeles 2028, luego de quedarse fuera de París 2024. Vamooooos 💪🏻

    8.3K97302177K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20263.1x their median

    Que trabajo de Almada con el América. Se ve una idea de juego, están físicamente a tope y le está dando mucha bola a los jóvenes. Mejor inicio imposible: líderes de la Liga MX y de la Leagues Cup.

    8.1K244598106K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.0x their median

    Sobre la convocatoria de la selección: Se celebra la convocatoria de Campillo (ya se habían tardado). Al igual Camberos y Sandoval. Esas bandas tienen que ser de ellos para el 2030. Cracks los dos. Justa convocatoria de Jeremy Márquez y Violante. No entiendo lo del Chucky y Cervantes. Por más que no sea titular hoy, Ledezma es más que Jorge Sánchez. ¿Opiniones?

    7.7K17415011262K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.0x their median

    Por cierto, metía ese gol Álvarez al 94 y se caía el estadio.

    7.7K15711611112K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.731%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 5.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.

What is Andrés Vaca's engagement rate on X?
Andrés Vaca (@Andres_Vaca_) has an engagement rate of 0.731%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 368,315 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.731%, Andrés Vaca sits above the 75th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Andres_Vaca_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Andres_Vaca_ post?
Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going