Andrés Vaca engagement report
@Andres_Vaca_ - 368K followers on X
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.731%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 5.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 47 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Andrés Vaca's engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.731%, Andrés Vaca sits above the 75th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.671% to 2.53%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 4% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 128 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 30, 20265.4x their median
Sobre el juego de hoy: - Mateo Chávez el mejor. No le pide nada a Gallardo. - Hoy demostró Fidalgo que puede pelearle el puesto a Chávez. - Everardo muy bien en defensa. - Con Romo el equipo se vio mejor, es garantía. - La vida post Raúl Jiménez pinta difícil.
- Sep 27, 20265.3x their median
Sobre el partido de México: - Mora el mejor de todos. Somos muy afortunados de tenerlo. - El partido de Johan, Alvarado, Lira y Reyes, fantástico. - Fidalgo te da más que Chávez. - Obed siempre es garantía. ¿Algo más?
- Sep 10, 20264.2x their median
América, Guadalajara, Monterrey, Toluca, Atlas y Cruz Azul tienen unos planteles de miedo. Dirigen Milito, Mohamed, Almada, Almeyda, Paiva, Crespo, Herrera, Huiqui y Abreu. La Premier League del continente americano, señores. https://t.co/xSWFLRRcef
- Aug 28, 20264.1x their median
Pocas veces me ha dado tanto gusto un traspaso como el de Lira al Mónaco. Trabajó sin descanso para cumplir este sueño y, cuando apareció una oferta multimillonaria que habría convencido a muchos, tuvo la valentía de mantenerse firme. No tengo duda de que conquistará Francia.
- Aug 8, 20263.8x their median
Acá les pregunto ¿Cuáles serían sus tres refuerzos para los Juegos Olímpicos? Yo la tengo clara: Johan, Lira y Quiñones.
- Sep 1, 20263.3x their median
Que triste lo del fichaje de Lira. Hay que decir que el menos culpable es el Cruz Azul: respetaron los tiempos y acordaron días antes del cierre. Después el manejo fue una lágrima… todo de última hora y con prisas, sumado a la mala suerte del test físico de Balogun. Día triste.
- Aug 7, 20263.1x their median
Si México Sub-20 vence hoy a Canadá en el Estadio Azteca, asegurará su boleto a los Juegos Olímpicos de Los Ángeles 2028, luego de quedarse fuera de París 2024. Vamooooos 💪🏻
- Aug 10, 20263.1x their median
Que trabajo de Almada con el América. Se ve una idea de juego, están físicamente a tope y le está dando mucha bola a los jóvenes. Mejor inicio imposible: líderes de la Liga MX y de la Leagues Cup.
- Sep 18, 20263.0x their median
Sobre la convocatoria de la selección: Se celebra la convocatoria de Campillo (ya se habían tardado). Al igual Camberos y Sandoval. Esas bandas tienen que ser de ellos para el 2030. Cracks los dos. Justa convocatoria de Jeremy Márquez y Violante. No entiendo lo del Chucky y Cervantes. Por más que no sea titular hoy, Ledezma es más que Jorge Sánchez. ¿Opiniones?
- Sep 20, 20263.0x their median
Por cierto, metía ese gol Álvarez al 94 y se caía el estadio.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 2.7K interactions against 368K followers, an engagement rate of 0.731%. Measured over 47 original posts, its engagement rate beats 95% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 50K times each, and 5.43% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 13.4% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 15K interactions, about 5.4x its own typical post.
- What is Andrés Vaca's engagement rate on X?
- Andrés Vaca (@Andres_Vaca_) has an engagement rate of 0.731%, based on the median interactions across 47 original posts from the last 30 days against 368,315 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.731%, Andrés Vaca sits above the 75th percentile of the 200,870 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @Andres_Vaca_ have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 95% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @Andres_Vaca_ post?
- Most posts go out around 20:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.