Back to @AndreasSteno's profile

Andreas Steno Larsen engagement report

@AndreasSteno - 299K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.089%
of 299K followers
Per impression
0.921%
29K views on a typical post
Reach
9.67%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
266
interactions (median)
Saved
0.066%
19 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 266 interactions against 299K followers, an engagement rate of 0.089%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.921% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026. Recurring tag: #sad.

Compared with accounts its own size

Andreas Steno Larsen's engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 40% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.089%, Andreas Steno Larsen sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video80% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 80% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 198 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 17, 202626x their median

    I have a pretty simple suggestion for Dario: If you want to slow things down, just move Anthropic to the EU.

    6.2K43024998184K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 202620x their median

    Happens every time https://t.co/etAu68zK3E

    5.1K2041820166K viewsView on X
  • Oct 17, 202610.0x their median

    We went from: > Anthropic could wipe out humanity > Astra is AGI > Software is worthless To: > AI isn’t even that useful > Anthropic’s growth is disappointing > OpenAI has zero moat In like a month. Crazy how the human mind works, huh?

    2.3K12516125166K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20269.5x their median

    Even with hundreds of thousands of connections and followers on LinkedIn, only 10 have seen this post. What a coincidence. Linked-in is a censored platform. https://t.co/48GKyYxheY

    2.3K156113661K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20269.2x their median

    $ASML Q3’26 EARNINGS HIGHLIGHTS 🔹 Net Sales: €11,662M (Est. €11.56B) 🟢 🔹 EPS: €12.95 (Est. €10.60) 🟢 🔹 Gross Margin: 57.5% (Est. 54.8%) 🟢 🔹 Net Income: €5.0B (Est. €4.06B) 🟢 FY26 Guide: 🔹 Net Sales: €44B-€45B (Est. €43.73B) 🟢 🔹 Gross Margin: ~56% (Est. 54.0%) 🟢 Q4 Guide: 🔹 Net Sales: €14.2B-€15.2B (Est. €13.8B) 🟢 🔹 Gross Margin: ~57% (Est. 54.9%) 🟢 🔹 R&D Costs: ~€1.2B 🔹 SG&A Costs: ~€0.4B Capital Return: 🔹 Share Buybacks: ~€4.1B in Q3 🔹 Interim Dividend: €1.88/share Key Updates: 🔹 Supply as currently planned for both 2027 and 2028 will not fully meet customer demand 🔹 Investigating ways to increase capacity for 2028 beyond the 30% increase previously communicated

    1.9K35763153396K viewsView on X
  • Oct 18, 20267.4x their median

    The craziest thing is that France’s riots are backed (dare I say organized?) by La France Insoumise, yet the media keeps obsessing over the “risk of a rightward shift” in French politics. What about the risk of violent leftist lunatics coming to power? https://t.co/u3aJX7zDI7

    1.7K150851436K viewsView on X
  • Jun 13, 20264.3x their median

    Would be fun indeed https://t.co/DfhuLy6nhf

    1.7K1436628231K viewsView on X
  • Oct 14, 20267.1x their median

    The neocloud massacre continues 😳 • $CRWV -15% • $NBIS -10% • $IREN -10% • $HUT -9% • $WULF -9% • $WYFI -8% • $CIFR -8% https://t.co/FGkEbUFAu4

    1.5K18514140207K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20266.9x their median

    JUST IN: BOJ says another rate hike is inevitable https://t.co/6UXFAE2GG0

    1.6K187394298K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20264.9x their median

    Jeg har egentlig længe troet, at wokeismen ikke ville kunne komme til Danmark i det omfang, den ødelagde de amerikanske kystbyer for nogle år siden, men jeg er ved at blive i tvivl. Se dette fuldkommen bizarre indslag til et forældremøde i en københavnsk institution. Hvad er det dog for noget? Vuggestuebørn skal ikke seksualiseres. Det her skal bare stoppe nu!

    1.1K71159789K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#sad

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 266 interactions against 299K followers, an engagement rate of 0.089%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 57% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 29K times each, and 0.921% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.66% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 80% carry an image or video and 15% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.0K interactions, about 26x its own typical post.

What is Andreas Steno Larsen's engagement rate on X?
Andreas Steno Larsen (@AndreasSteno) has an engagement rate of 0.089%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 299,014 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.089%, Andreas Steno Larsen sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AndreasSteno have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 57% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AndreasSteno post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going