Back to @AndreCVentura's profile

André Ventura engagement report

@AndreCVentura - 254K followers on X

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.424%
of 254K followers
Per impression
7.22%
15K views on a typical post
Reach
5.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.067%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.57/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 254K followers, an engagement rate of 0.424%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 7.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.6K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 76 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

André Ventura's engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 93% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.424%, André Ventura sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link1% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 1% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 177 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 6, 20266.2x their median

    A AfD teve hoje uma vitória histórica no Estado da Saxónia-Anhalt. Ainda não sabemos se há ou não maioria absoluta, mas também os alemães estão a abrir os olhos contra a imigração ilegal e descontrolada, a corrupção e a captura da nossa liberdade e identidade. Parabéns! https://t.co/478ymB2EaZ

    5.6K7722193357K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.3x their median

    Podem-se pôr bandeira islâmicas, podem-se pôr bandeiras LGTBQ+, podem-se pôr bandeiras Free Palestine, mas não se pode hastear a bandeira do próprio país. O Reino Unido morreu!!! https://t.co/Rv1QkOgKIw

    4.6K8402182645K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.8x their median

    Isto não é uma questão de nacionalidade ou raça. Todos têm de cumprir regras. Se há direitos, também há deveres! https://t.co/ulnRrP3E8H

    3.5K4261452598K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.7x their median

    É esta hoje a lógica da esquerda e dos liberais na Europa: dá-se nacionalidade a toda a gente que cá passa. É um erro e os problemas estão à vista...é preciso defender a nossa identidade 💪🇵🇹🇵🇹🇵🇹 https://t.co/4xhIv4SutH

    3.3K3981772552K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.3x their median

    Obrigado pela confiança ❤️ Vou continuar a trabalhar todos os dias por merecê-la e dar a Portugal, quando chegar o momento, um Governo digno desse nome! https://t.co/TsC9VzDKge

    3.0K337179729K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.1x their median

    Não é a ONU que decide o que aprova e não aprova o Parlamento português. E sim, é uma aberração e um disparate permitir mudanças de sexo a menores de idade! Não vamos retirar a iniciativa! https://t.co/tuwAWLjlAA

    2.7K3862203325K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.9x their median

    Várias meninas foram violadas em Ceuta. Vejam a lógica e os argumentos destes imigrantes que a esquerda defende tanto!!! https://t.co/NMe96igrOV

    2.5K467851133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.8x their median

    Devem passar para o ano seguinte os alunos com mérito para isso, e não quem não andou lá a fazer nada. Se é para passar toda a gente sem critério não é uma escola, é um campo de férias. O país é que perde! https://t.co/ccbBKhhDza

    2.5K3001431327K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20262.4x their median

    Caros apoiantes e seguidores, como sabem o Presidente da AR bloqueou pela 2° vez a nossa Comissão de Inquérito ao Luís Neves. Vão arranjar tudo para não deixar esta investigação acontecer. É definitivo ou continuamos a insistir até essa Comissão ser constituída? O que acham?

    1.9K1365672364K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.3x their median

    Então a mãe das gémeas veio para Portugal para defraudar o sistema de saúde português e obter tratamentos que não deviam ser os contribuintes a pagar...e quem é multado e ameaçado é o canal de televisão que expõe a situação. Que tipo de país estamos a construir??? https://t.co/GIJFmK61BX

    2.1K275891535K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 254K followers, an engagement rate of 0.424%. Measured over 76 original posts, its engagement rate beats 83% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 15K times each, and 7.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 76 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.6K interactions, about 6.2x its own typical post.

What is André Ventura's engagement rate on X?
André Ventura (@AndreCVentura) has an engagement rate of 0.424%, based on the median interactions across 76 original posts from the last 30 days against 253,829 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.424%, André Ventura sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AndreCVentura have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 83% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AndreCVentura post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going