Christine Anderson engagement report
@AndersonAfDMdEP - 420K followers on X
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 420K followers, an engagement rate of 0.259%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 6.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 52x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #afd, #ltwlsa, #merz.
Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026. Recurring tags: #afd, #ltwlsa, #merz.
Compared with accounts its own size
Christine Anderson's engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 94% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.259%, Christine Anderson sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.147% to 0.699%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.699% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 85% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 64% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 64% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 312 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 9, 202652x their median
„Herr Merz, die Deutschen sind nicht zu faul, um mehr zu arbeiten. Sie sehen, dass Leistung sich nicht lohnt, weil ein ungerechtes Steuersystem ihnen alles wegnimmt.“ https://t.co/EWPiNSm0T4
- Aug 10, 202615x their median
‼️Die Dokumente, die Pfizer 75 Jahre lang zu verbergen versuchte, werden euch das Blut in den Adern gefrieren lassen‼️ 270 schwangere Frauen wurden im Rahmen der Pfizer-Studie geimpft. 234 dieser Schwangerschaftsunterlagen sind komplett VERSCHWUNDEN! Das ist eine VERTUSCHUNG! Von den 36 Frauen, die tatsächlich nachverfolgt wurden, haben über 80 % IHRE BABYS VERLOREN – und Pfizer wusste davon! Pfizer und seine Kumpanen bei der FDA wollten diese Dokumente bis 2096 unter Verschluss halten, weil die Pharmaindustrie und ihre Kumpanen bei der FDA, der CDC und den NIH die Wahrheit vom ERSTEN TAG AN KANNTEN. Sie wussten, dass schwangere Frauen einem Risiko ausgesetzt waren. Sie wussten, dass Babys starben. Sie haben es trotzdem durchgesetzt, weil zu viel Geld auf dem Spiel stand. Dieselben Behörden, die uns versicherten, es sei „sicher und wirksam“, waren genau diejenigen, die alle Daten VERSTECKTEN, die das Gegenteil bewiesen. ‼️ Verbrechen gegen die Menschlichkeit! ‼️
- Aug 11, 202614x their median
++ #Fauci’s #Covid mobile phone has been seized. Why can’t the same finally be done with #vonderLeyen’s? ++ #Pfizergate #Pfizer https://t.co/o7Kqhv0OjS
- Jul 11, 202613x their median
Die ersten 100 Tage einer AfD-geführten Regierung. Unser Sofortprogramm für unser Land! https://t.co/hIfDXl7wV6
- Sep 17, 20268.0x their median
Ursula #vonderLeyen will die Demokratie „schützen" - mit einem Instrument, das sich gegen die eigenen Bürger richtet. Offiziell heißt es: ausländische Einflussnahme abwehren. In Wahrheit entstehen unter den Stichworten „Fake News", „Desinformation" und „Hate Speech" Werkzeuge, die entscheiden, was Sie in den sozialen Medien überhaupt noch sehen dürfen. Es ist ein Zensurinstrument. Die EU-Kommission hat keine Angst um die Demokratie - sie hat Angst vor der Demokratie. Dissidenten sollen zum Schweigen gebracht werden, damit sich Brüssel mit seinen Kritikern gar nicht erst auseinandersetzen muss. Worum es wirklich geht: 🔹 Am 12.11.2025 stellte die Kommission den „#DemocracyShield" mit rund 50 Maßnahmen vor 🔹 Herzstück: ein neues „Zentrum für demokratische Resilienz", das sogenannte Faktenchecker zentral koordiniert 🔹 Durchgesetzt wird über den #DigitalServicesAct (DSA) 🔹 Wer definiert „Desinformation"? Am Ende die, die kritisiert werden. Es geht um unsere Meinungsfreiheit. Bis hierher und keinen Schritt weiter. Stoppen wir diesen Wahnsinn. ⚠️ DAS KANNST DU JETZT TUN: • Verlinke Ursula von der Leyen unter diesem Video • Teile es in den sozialen Medien • Informiere dich unter https://t.co/Ty5l7lOqy2 • Unterzeichne unsere Petition
- Sep 24, 20267.9x their median
Wenn man Philipp Amthor (CDU) ins Kanzleramt holt und dessen erste Amtshandlung die Bestellung eines Strandkorbs ist, dann weißt Du: Die CDU schickt ihr letztes Aufgebot - die AfD ist die Zukunft unseres Landes. https://t.co/HUSSUW8oPz
- Sep 20, 20266.3x their median
++ 🔥 4️⃣,9️⃣ % in #MecklenburgVorpommern! Das Aus für #Merz? ++ Frei nach dem legendären Herbert Zimmermann: RAUS, RAUS, DIE CDU IST RAUS! Erstmalig in der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik verpasst die #CDU den Einzug in einen #Landtag! Eine Zäsur in der deutschen Parteiengeschichte - ohne jeden Zweifel! #Kanzler #MecklenburgVorpommernWählt #Landtagswahl #LtwMV
- Sep 17, 20266.0x their median
++ You Call it #DemocracyShield? It's a Declaration of WAR!++ Your Orwellian language fools no one. Your defence is an attack and your freedom is totalitarian control. You are building a weapon pointed at the very people that you were elected to protect. ℹ️https://t.co/onjS4ytSY5 https://t.co/67binbLMP1
- Sep 20, 20265.9x their median
Unglaublich: Die EU-Kommission setzt sich über eine klare Empfehlung der EU-Bürgerbeauftragten hinweg und weigert sich weiterhin, die automatische Löschung von Kurzmitteilungen und Chat-Nachrichten ihrer Präsidentin Ursula #vonderLeyen zu stoppen. https://t.co/cH85BHoGO3 https://t.co/BDwOfcoFdt
- Sep 16, 20264.5x their median
🚨 SKANDAL IM EU-PARLAMENT: JULIJA MENDEL WIRD DER ZUTRITT VERWEIGERT! Sie war Pressesprecherin von Wolodymyr Selenskyj – heute wollte Julija Mendel im Europäischen Parlament über ihre Erfahrungen und Perspektiven für Frieden in der Ukraine sprechen. Doch sie kam nicht einmal durch die Tür! Trotz gültigem Zugangsausweis wurde Mendel heute der Zutritt zum Europäischen Parlament in Straßburg verweigert. @dr_neuhoff, der Mendel als Rednerin eingeladen hatte, kritisiert den Vorgang scharf: „Das Europäische Parlament ist kein privater Veranstaltungsraum der Parlamentspräsidentin und auch kein Instrument fremder Regierungen.“ Besonders brisant: Mendel arbeitete selbst jahrelang unmittelbar für Selenskyj. Heute wollte sie vor einem angemeldeten Publikum über Frieden in ihrer Heimat sprechen. Warum wurde ihr Zugang kurzfristig aufgehoben? Wer hat die Entscheidung getroffen und auf welcher Grundlage? Wir verlangen vollständige Aufklärung. Politische Debattenfreiheit darf nicht davon abhängen, ob eine Meinung der Parlamentsführung gefällt.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.1K interactions against 420K followers, an engagement rate of 0.259%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 84% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 6.70% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video and 64% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56K interactions, about 52x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #afd, #ltwlsa, #merz.
- What is Christine Anderson's engagement rate on X?
- Christine Anderson (@AndersonAfDMdEP) has an engagement rate of 0.259%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 419,792 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.259%, Christine Anderson sits above the 50th percentile of the 213,381 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AndersonAfDMdEP have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 84% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AndersonAfDMdEP post?
- Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.33 posts per day across the measured window.