Back to @Amy_Siskind's profile

Amy Siskind engagement report

@Amy_Siskind - 448K followers on X

Measured over 99 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.115%
of 448K followers
Per impression
5.48%
9.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.10%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
515
interactions (median)
Saved
0.074%
7 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.6/day
active 80% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 515 interactions against 448K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 99 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 5.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 99 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 46% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 139x its own typical post.

Measured over 99 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026. Recurring tag: #trumpwinning.

Compared with accounts its own size

Amy Siskind's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 91% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.115%, Amy Siskind sits above the 25th percentile of the 198,354 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.14%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.14%
p750.665%
p902.52%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 198,354 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,930 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.14%
75th percentile0.665%
90th percentile2.52%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video26% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link46% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 26% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 46% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 282 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 2026139x their median

    Trump to a just 10-year-old boy who was saved by a 16-year-old lifeguard. “I probably wouldn't have jumped into the water to rescue you. You’re lucky I wasn't on duty.” Their facial expressions don’t lie. What a messed up thing to say. https://t.co/S2LntDi8sq

    61K8.5K1.4K5802.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202635x their median

    Wonder why Hegseth fired senior staffers at Stars and Stripes? It’s because of reporting like this: “Nearly six months after the U.S. Navy evacuated 1,300 family members from Bahrain at the start of the Iran war, officials are saying the evacuees cannot return for the foreseeable future and should find new homes elsewhere. The evacuation has left families in limbo and forced military officials to improvise solutions for support programs that were never designed to sustain a displacement lasting this long. Some evacuees say they have spent tens of thousands of dollars out of pocket for basic living expenses. Others are sleeping on the floors of temporary housing, while their cars and furniture are stranded in Bahrain or aboard ships unable to leave the region.” https://t.co/RDPGHi5gzn

    12K5.4K174137444K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 202627x their median

    F%ck you @Google https://t.co/v1CWnxDXP2

    11K1.2K1.6K118149K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 202626x their median

    This is simply vile. Trump is a loser, and an embarrassment to our country. https://t.co/yBLYND8fly

    10K1.5K1.7K4991.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 202626x their median

    https://t.co/LheWlPhkuN

    9.4K3.6K32312497K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 202618x their median

    Someone is going to have to explain to the American people why Trump invited Russia to the G20, why Bessent is blaming Ukraine (this is f*cking nuts!) for high gas prices, all while FT is reporting Russia is secretly helping Iran develop advanced supersonic cruise missiles which will be capable of threatening U.S. aircraft carriers and other warships in the Middle East. Common sense here. This does not add up!

    7.0K2.1K20659130K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202617x their median

    What’s also amazing is that while Trump quite literally destroys the Kennedy Center, his nephew RFK Jr says nothing. Profile on cowardice. Shameful excuse for a man!

    7.9K8971261250K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202616x their median

    Please spread the word for midterms, the Trump regime has already slowed down the USPS, here’s what to do: use drop boxes, vote early in person, or mail your ballots at least two weeks before Election Day.

    5.2K2.7K1697785K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 202612x their median

    This obituary of Dolly Parton by Bill Friskics-Warren is on track to become the New York Times's most read obit of all time https://t.co/ozE4v3WCzr

    5.3K9275225360K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202611x their median

    "Trump TV" appears to be a YouTube channel meant to show the president's "greatest hits." Fewer than 5,000 people are watching, and the comments are already turned off. https://t.co/Iar5lTbc8w

    4.5K77710983156K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#trumpwinning

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 515 interactions against 448K followers, an engagement rate of 0.115%. Measured over 99 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 19,675 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.4K times each, and 5.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.10% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 99 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 46% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 71K interactions, about 139x its own typical post.

What is Amy Siskind's engagement rate on X?
Amy Siskind (@Amy_Siskind) has an engagement rate of 0.115%, based on the median interactions across 99 original posts from the last 30 days against 448,368 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.115%, Amy Siskind sits above the 25th percentile of the 198,354 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Amy_Siskind have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,675 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Amy_Siskind post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going