Back to @Amieralexandra's profile

Amira Alexandra engagement report

@Amieralexandra - 802K followers on X

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.047%
of 802K followers
Per impression
0.156%
239K views on a typical post
Reach
30.0%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
372
interactions (median)
Saved
0.001%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.57/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 372 interactions against 802K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 239K times each, and 0.156% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 913 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post.

Measured over 12 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Amira Alexandra's engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 11% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.047%, Amira Alexandra sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link83% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 866 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 28, 20262.5x their median

    📣 ALBERICH TOKEN IDO IS NOW LIVE ON SPORES LAUNCHPAD 📣 Introducing Alberich Token (ALBRH) by @LegendAwakes - The world's first “Musical Meme Coin,” inspired by Richard Wagner's legendary “Ring of the Nibelung” . Alberich represents a new category of blockchain project – one where mythology, culture, and innovation converge to forge the future.☄️ tnership 🍀 Exclusive vouchers: ALBRH-IDO (Discount 10%, up to $100) ✔️ JOIN NOW: https://t.co/5nxHIgzHBj Your adventure awaits, don't let it pass you by ⏱

    43977194203932K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Real-world utility is becoming one of the more important narratives in crypto, especially around payments and cross-border transactions. That’s what caught my attention about ZakPay and the broader Zakat Coin ecosystem. They’ve built Visa-style payment infrastructure using blockchain for cross-border settlement, with funds remaining in custodial accounts until the transaction reaches settlement. In other words, blockchain is being used as part of the orchestration and settlement infrastructure rather than simply moving customer funds on-chain. But here’s where the model gets particularly interesting. $ZKTC is integrated directly into the ecosystem’s transaction mechanics. On settled transactions, $ZKTC is burned to the 0xdead address, permanently removing those tokens from circulation. Then there’s ODS — On-Demand Supply — designed to connect token supply availability to actual economic activity across the ecosystem rather than simply releasing supply according to a calendar. And one of the most interesting parts of the model: Giving is built into the transaction architecture. ZakPay is designed so everyday payment activity can generate charitable contributions. As people send, spend and move money through the ecosystem, a portion can simultaneously contribute to charitable giving. Think about that combination: Real payments → Settlement → $ZKTC utility Transaction activity → Embedded charitable giving Economic activity → ODS supply mechanics That’s a very different story from launching a token first and trying to figure out the utility later. $ZKTC is already live on Coinstore, while ZakPay’s broader commercial rollout is still ahead. That’s the part I’ll be watching closely: what happens to transaction volume, charitable impact and $ZKTC utility if ZakPay starts achieving meaningful real-world adoption? Join the ZakPay waitlist: https://t.co/zpVokXOc8Z ZakPay: https://t.co/TwCPR6xW2y Zakat Coin: https://t.co/qq3rYH7q1S Telegram: https://t.co/SNu5RaTnw3 ZKTC/USDT on Coinstore: https://t.co/Co1RFBRd6e $ZKTC #ZakatCoin #ZakPay #RWA #Crypto #Payments #CrossBorderPayments #Fintech #Web3

    218471420357K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    Agalio Network ($AGL) is approaching an important milestone. The project is set to officially list on BNB Chain on October 9, 2026, with a total supply of 300M $AGL and 150M $AGL planned to be burned at launch. What caught my attention is that the ecosystem already has 9 utilities live, including a cross-chain launchpad, escrow protocol, global marketplace, staking, gaming, Web3 education, payments, and DAO governance. So this isn’t simply a token launch. The team is building the ecosystem first and expanding from there. I’ll be watching how $AGL performs once it goes live. https://t.co/mlQfCtozXJ https://t.co/S3Dmvf8deL https://t.co/aYEsPqH3ku

    29761480315K viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    Robinhood Chain might be building one of the strangest RWA ecosystems in crypto. And @RealBucketShop is taking it to another level. Bucket has built a launchpad where trading fees can automatically: 📈 Buy tokenised stocks for holders 🔥 Buy back & burn the token 🏦 Build stock backing 💧 Deepen locked liquidity All programmed at launch. $BUCKET CA: 0xbc9E7b1c5C0081f4aE85e71eC95703d3dEC9ffaD Now somebody has used all of that financial engineering to create... a cat wearing a bucket hat. 🐱🪣 BUCKET HAT CAT ($BHC) The meme is stupid. The tokenomics absolutely aren't. The creator-side allocation from every trade is permanently set: 📈 53% → tokenised stocks for holders 🔥 31% → BUY BACK & BURN $BHC 🏦 7% → stock backing 💧 4% → locked liquidity 🧑‍💻 5% → creator So 95% is routed back toward holders, the token or its liquidity. Holders automatically get: SPY • NVDA • TSLA • GOOGL • MU • COIN • SNDK • PLTR No staking. No claiming. Once your distribution reaches $2, the tokenised stocks are automatically sent to your wallet. And $BHC itself: → 1B fixed supply → No mint function → No free team allocation → Creator bought their tokens like everyone else → Creator currently holds only 0.94% → 2% trading fee → Liquidity locks at graduation This might be the most over-engineered cat meme I've ever seen. Everyone else is promising utility someday. This idiot put on a bucket hat and started paying its holders stocks while buying and burning itself. 🐱🪣📈🔥 Buy $BHC through Bucket Shop: https://t.co/OdwR4bWguc CA: 0x2d2e5cb9319c3b893db80eb6f9e2cea386720cf9 Full disclosure: the creator slipped me a few dollars to show you this. In my defence, I've been offered money to post much less financially sophisticated cats

    27561560211K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    Meme coins come and go, but the ones with a clear identity and something people can rally around are usually the ones I find most interesting. That’s what caught my attention with Kinda solana:HWzUC1x4WAyHjvKM9XtAxmd9PwNwjySgt4PXDN7opump. The concept is simple, the branding is recognizable, and the whole project is built around an identity that can naturally translate into community-driven content and memes. The 112M+ solana:HWzUC1x4WAyHjvKM9XtAxmd9PwNwjySgt4PXDN7opump already burned also adds an interesting layer to the story, giving the community another element to build around. Still early and definitely speculative, but I’m curious to see how far the Kinda Chic narrative can go if the community keeps pushing it. CA: DFx9Zg1tgjBP9siauXi8QPxSX4QKxeNf7wkh4RFWpump Chart: https://t.co/mhA2MLRNfd X: https://t.co/7DGOoKoxaM

    27850491319K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    A major IEO opportunity is coming for Global 全球币. The first round of the Global 全球币 IEO is scheduled to launch on GW Wallet on September 8, 2026 at 11:58 PM Beijing time. IEO Price: 0.1 USDT Latest Market Price: 0.958 USDT Token: Global 全球币 CA: 0xf7813c5b7557b001a62883f54240a1db6ffeaeed IEO-purchased tokens will be automatically locked for 360 days, followed by a 1% monthly release. Participation requires a GW Wallet. How to download GW Wallet: Simply open the official website https://t.co/GLkYjZdDmb in a third-party browser such as Chrome or Edge and download the wallet from there. For Apple devices, after downloading, you may need to go to Settings → General → VPN & Device Management → Trust the relevant developer profile. For more details, check the project on DEX Screener and verify all official IEO information before participating. Big opportunities don’t wait. DYOR and be prepared.

    26454560324K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    🔥 $DEOD Is Rising — I Think $0.020 Is Coming Today. After weeks of consolidation, $DEOD is finally breaking out and momentum is picking up. Here’s my setup: Buy → $0.018 Target → $0.050 I added more around $0.018 on MEXC today. And look at the last 3 exchange listing moves: CoinDCX → +147% WEEX → +54% BingX → +67% Now Poloniex is next — September 11 at 10 AM UTC. 🚀 $DEOD is already trading on MEXC, BingX, Toobit & PancakeSwap. My view: $0.020 first, then let’s see how far it can run before Poloniex. 👀🔥 NFA. DYOR.

    25570490218K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 2026

    I found something yesterday that makes absolutely no sense sitting at a $2.3K market cap. $WSS. The idea is simple. Wallstreet Squirrel collects trading fees, uses them to buy tokenized $GME, and sends that $GME back to holders. So the meme is literally doing what squirrels do. It stacks. Just not acorns. It stacks $GME. And right now almost nobody knows it exists. $2.3K MC means: $100K → 43x $1M → 435x $10M → 4,348x Obviously, it can also go to zero. That’s microcaps. But I’ve seen enough $2M memes with absolutely nothing behind them to know that a $2.3K meme with an actual mechanism and a GME story is worth my attention. I’m in. $WSS 🐿️ @WallstreetSquir CA: 0x26a1e30d62c27ef415479147ca4e170f128f73e8

    26751550232K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    🚨 THE HUMABIRD BUY CHALLENGE IS LIVE! 🐦🔥 Think you’re one of the real believers? The Shadow of the Huma Bird has a reward for you. 🎁 Buy 500K $HUMABIRD → Get 50K $HUMABIRD BONUS How to qualify: 1️⃣ Like & RT the challenge post 2️⃣ Buy 500K $HUMABIRD on https://t.co/ad93Gx97Oy 3️⃣ Drop your Solana wallet + purchase screenshot or TX link 👇 The flock is growing. Let’s see who’s ready to fly with $HUMABIRD. 🐦⚡️ CA: GkJiayT8ej2owKuTRJHmeHZabELsk8UZvYy41Pwgpump Buy: https://t.co/iS21EZiESu $SOL #Humabird #SolanaGems #Pumpfun #MemeCoin #Solana

    25858540233K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026

    BotCoin $BOTZ | @BotCoinBOTZ Meme coins are about community, and $BOTZ is putting plenty of focus there. With 50M $BOTZ in staking rewards now live, plus 1M+ $BOTZ in weekly community rewards, daily giveaways & creative contests, there’s always something happening. I like the approach: make it fun, keep people involved, and build beyond the short-term hype. Stake. Earn. Participate. Grow With $BOTZ. Website: https://t.co/yx3OZBEY5t CA: 8hbHUyJhEKE6SK595ZNKAnNkoJ45gwkR2qskooupump

    24557500244K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 372 interactions against 802K followers, an engagement rate of 0.047%. Measured over 12 original posts, its engagement rate beats 58% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 239K times each, and 0.156% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 29.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.57 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 12 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 913 interactions, about 2.5x its own typical post.

What is Amira Alexandra's engagement rate on X?
Amira Alexandra (@Amieralexandra) has an engagement rate of 0.047%, based on the median interactions across 12 original posts from the last 30 days against 801,583 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.047%, Amira Alexandra sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Amieralexandra have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 58% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Amieralexandra post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going