Back to @AmarCoDTV's profile

Amar engagement report

@AmarCoDTV - 318K followers on X

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.281%
of 318K followers
Per impression
2.64%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
10.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
894
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.97/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 894 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.281%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 19 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 14, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Amar's engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.281%, Amar sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video42% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 143 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 25, 20267.0x their median

    Starting a Fortnite Petition: - We need to change the current Heats system (people just get 2nd on purpose to grief others) - Make upper and lower bracket again - 6 Games - More content, so people can actually get hyped - More qualifier (Opens) - Ban or make warnings for macros - Knocked bodies shouldn´t be able to crawl infinite - Rework Div Cups - Rework Performance Cups - More normal Cash Cups in Duo and Solo to support more upcoming talents - 1 Victory Cash Cup a week is great - Need to have a rejoin button when you disconnect - 1 off Day a week is great - We need midgame incentives like lootcaches - Reboot system update (let players have guns and mats like in reload) - Div 1 players should also be degraded to Div 2 when not performing - (Personal: Multiplier of 1.25 and threshold system for FNCS Finals) - Controller needs something like scroll wheel 100% - Div lock (You can only play your own Div not smurfing others) - Please bring Org skins, cosmetics, etc. and 50/50 the revenue for prizemoney

    4.9K74959915161K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20265.7x their median

    Fortnite GC in Belgium will be a movie!!! Register to get info and tickets first: https://t.co/aPCE3R6R8E https://t.co/y5nG1MeMpk

    3.0K1168225485K viewsView on X
  • Aug 2, 20263.3x their median

    HOT TAKE: - FNCS NEEDS MIDGAME OBJECTIVES!!! Like Caches or Island - Early Game is ok - Endgame is great - If you kill someone 100-150 surge added!!!! Everything else in Midgame is boring to watch tbh

    2.7K9182199K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20263.0x their median

    I love you @Vicotryona & @MalibucaFN you guys are the goats!!!!!!!

    2.6K5320049K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20262.8x their median

    Eu>Asia>NA

    2.4K59431121K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20262.0x their median

    I want to invite some newcomers to my solo invitational. I do have 20 more spots left. The first 70 is filled with absolute T1 Pros (Best Lobby ever to exist) 10 are people I believe in and I want to inv people who actually deserve to make an apperiance. So comment below!

    1.2K13525296K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20261.9x their median

    Duo announcement! Will Land tilted towers @BuckeFPS https://t.co/fzZZtm5zce

    1.7K1715172K viewsView on X
  • Jun 1, 20261.9x their median

    Wir haben gestern Geschichte geschrieben, WIR gemeinsam! Niemand kann uns diese Momente nehmen, wir haben gelacht, wir haben geschrien, wir sind gelaufen und zum Schluss haben wir geweint… Ich schreibe euch das gerade mit Gänsehaut an meinem ganzen Körper, jeder kann das was passiert ist, als Motivation sehen, dass jeder wirklich alles schaffen kann, wenn man dazu bereit ist Opfer zu machen. Alle die auf und neben der Bühne saßen haben Opfer in ihrem Leben bringen müssen… egal ob jemand denkt es wäre cringe so zu sein, es ist cringe nicht träumen zu dürfen, es muss nicht jedem gefallen! Danke an alle für diese Momente, das war auch für mich Top 3 Momente in meinem Leben. Ich danke und liebe euch!

    1.6K40590104K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20261.6x their median

    Vico & malibuca officially the GOATs of Fortnite!!!!

    1.3K3746036K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20261.5x their median

    FNCS TRIOS IS BACK 🔥 https://t.co/6A74FzrI58

    1.3K282053K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 894 interactions against 318K followers, an engagement rate of 0.281%. Measured over 19 original posts, its engagement rate beats 77% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 2.64% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.97 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 19 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video and 16% are part of a thread. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.2K interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

What is Amar's engagement rate on X?
Amar (@AmarCoDTV) has an engagement rate of 0.281%, based on the median interactions across 19 original posts from the last 30 days against 318,488 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.281%, Amar sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AmarCoDTV have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 77% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AmarCoDTV post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going