Back to @AltCryptoGems's profile

Sjuul | AltCryptoGems engagement report

@AltCryptoGems - 469K followers on X

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.095%
of 469K followers
Per impression
1.48%
30K views on a typical post
Reach
6.43%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
446
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 446 interactions against 469K followers, an engagement rate of 0.095%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 1.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 863 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post.

Measured over 28 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tag: #dyor.

Compared with accounts its own size

Sjuul | AltCryptoGems's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.095%, Sjuul | AltCryptoGems sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 330 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 21, 20261.9x their median

    $ADA still has one of the clearest bullish structures in the big caps. Now bulls need to step in and defend this higher low so we can hope for another leg up into a fresh higher high. https://t.co/QhDcj9VcPL

    7656232434K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20261.9x their median

    Injective is now home to 135 live onchain RWA markets. No other layer 1 pairs a live institutional tokenization record this deep with the regulatory rails to scale it. Here are just some of the institutions and milestones driving it. → POSCO International, South Korea's largest trading company, and LG CNS, the technology arm of LG Group, selected Injective to tokenize live trade receivables from real international commerce → Injective Institutional Services is now an SEC registered transfer agent, enabling Injective to tokenize assets in the US → The INJ MiCA white paper is listed on ESMA's register, opening access to $INJ across the EU → Injective CEO Eric Chen met with senior officials at the White House, SEC and CFTC this week to advance tokenization in the US → Over $1 Billion in real world assets are now tokenized on Injective → Gulf Labs, part of Thailand's $27 Billion GULF Group, bonded roughly 500,000 INJ as an institutional validator and will bring tokenization and stablecoins to Thai energy, telecom and banking → Markets for SpaceX, OpenAI, equities, FX and digital asset treasuries have driven over $6.8 Billion in cumulative RWA volume on Injective → Injective Mint is an upcoming major product launch, bringing the first platform built to take institutional grade RWAs mainstream with compliance controls enforced at the protocol level → Laser Digital, the digital asset arm of Nomura, Japan's largest investment bank, tokenized the Laser Carry Fund on Injective alongside BlackRock money market products and Hamilton Lane's SCOPE Senior Credit Fund, all with onchain secondary trading, collateralized lending and portfolio margining → Native USDC on Injective now powers payments to over 8,000 global merchants, with Circle's CCTP connecting Injective to 20+ blockchains → Musicow, South Korea's leading music rights platform with 1.2 million members and roughly 20,000 music IP rights traded, partnered with Injective to bring music IP onchain for fans and investors worldwide → NTT Digital, part of Japan's largest telco and a Fortune 500 giant, selected Injective as its primary blockchain partner for Web3 → $INJ joined a select group of assets with regulated access in both the US and Asia, with the first US CFTC regulated INJ futures now live for institutions → Three INJ ETF applications are now pending with the SEC Institutional funds. Fortune 500s. Public equities. Private markets. Pre-IPO assets. Real estate. Global enterprises. All on one network. And we are only getting started.

    661117423137K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20261.9x their median

    This time last year, $ZEC was below $50. Today, it’s well over $1,000. But Zcash may not be the only privacy play capable of a move like this… Here’s a selection of small-cap privacy tokens we’re closely watching. 🧵 https://t.co/5glafP2vS4

    69050852115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.7x their median

    We gave away control of our data in exchange for convenience. It’s time to change the terms. https://t.co/jzpuxdtfm7

    62511616831K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20261.7x their median

    Another higher just printed for $INJ! Perfect resistance flip and retest, and full sending from there! Solid project, promising chart; not sure we can ask much more, is it? https://t.co/kJiY8JsS8Q

    61810121030K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    $LINK is at a key inflection point here, still holding a bullish structure and a flipped support/resistance level. For any bullish continuation, it’s key for buyers to step in and defend this level. https://t.co/hGXjZa9soH

    6251914231K viewsView on X
  • Oct 20, 2026

    $PEPE is in a really interesting spot here! It’s still holding a high time frame bullish structure and compressing strongly at the current level. If it manages to break out of this compression, not only might we see a decent move, but it could also confirm the overall bullish structure.

    5852432138K viewsView on X
  • Oct 23, 2026

    Still a do-or-die level for $LINK here. Holding a high time frame bullish structure but so far failing to bounce. Bulls need to defend this low at any cost! https://t.co/bRcF4AhK6h

    5531018131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 2026

    God portfolio to set yourself up for the bull run: $PEAQ midnight-3:native $PUMP aster-2:native $VVV ethereum:0xfaba6f8e4a5e8ab82f62fe7c39859fa577269be3 #NFA #DYOR

    5271128244K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    $PENGU is still holding a bullish structure and a key support level. Now is truly the time to see whether bulls want to defend this level with conviction, or if they want to give up. Definitely one of those charts you pay attention to! https://t.co/FPiAEb56F0

    5351514134K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dyor

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 446 interactions against 469K followers, an engagement rate of 0.095%. Measured over 28 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 30K times each, and 1.48% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.44% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 28 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 863 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post.

What is Sjuul | AltCryptoGems's engagement rate on X?
Sjuul | AltCryptoGems (@AltCryptoGems) has an engagement rate of 0.095%, based on the median interactions across 28 original posts from the last 30 days against 468,713 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.095%, Sjuul | AltCryptoGems sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AltCryptoGems have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AltCryptoGems post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going