Alpha Gems engagement report
@AlphaGems_x1000 - 209K followers on X
Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 4 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 290 interactions against 209K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Posts are seen about 184K times each, and 0.157% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 88.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 309 interactions. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 4 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.14%, Alpha Gems sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 828 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 19, 2026
Real-world utility is becoming one of the key narratives in crypto, especially in payments and cross-border transactions. That’s what made me look closer at ZakPay and the broader Zakat Coin ecosystem. They’ve built Visa-style payment infrastructure using blockchain for cross-border settlement, while funds remain in custodial accounts until settlement is completed. Blockchain becomes part of the orchestration and settlement layer rather than simply moving customer funds on-chain. The $ZKTC mechanics are particularly interesting. On settled transactions, $ZKTC is burned to the 0xdead address, permanently taking those tokens out of circulation. There’s also ODS — On-Demand Supply — which is designed to link token supply availability to actual economic activity within the ecosystem rather than relying on a fixed release schedule. Then you have the charitable giving component. ZakPay is designed so everyday payment activity can generate charitable contributions. As users send, spend and move money through the ecosystem, a portion can simultaneously support charitable causes. The model brings several pieces together: Real payments → Settlement → $ZKTC utility Transaction activity → Charitable giving Economic activity → ODS supply mechanics That’s a different approach from launching a token first and trying to create utility afterward. $ZKTC is already live on Coinstore, while ZakPay’s broader commercial rollout is still ahead. The part I’ll be watching closely is whether real-world adoption can translate into meaningful transaction volume, charitable impact and continued $ZKTC utility. Join the ZakPay waitlist: https://t.co/W2lTN7suls ZakPay: https://t.co/LLHK2F3eut Zakat Coin: https://t.co/TJPPWMrm33 Telegram: https://t.co/4AYC2zRGPU ZKTC/USDT on Coinstore: https://t.co/lBsrIm4nnG $ZKTC #ZakatCoin #ZakPay #RWA #Crypto #Payments #CrossBorderPayments #Fintech #Web3
- Sep 6, 2026
$DEOD Is Catching Fire — 6 Days Before the Poloniex Debut. 🔥 I entered around $0.018 on MEXC after the breakout. Here’s my setup: Buy → $0.017–$0.018 Target → $0.03+ Poloniex is coming on September 11 at 10 AM UTC, and I’m expecting a strong move around the listing. 🚀 Why I’m bullish: ✅ Building since 2023 ✅ AI + Web3 ecosystem growin ✅ Staking already live ✅ Team keeps shipping $DEOD is already trading on MEXC, BingX & PancakeSwap. I’m already positioned. Now I’m waiting for the Poloniex move. NFA. DYOR.
- Sep 14, 2026
A lot of DeFi projects talk about sustainability, but $YFSX and $VIN are interesting because sustainability is built into the mechanics they’re trying to create. The ecosystem uses transaction activity as a core component. YFSX carries a stated 3% transaction fee, while VIN carries 2%, with the fees flowing into liquidity pools and supporting LP dividends. Then the dual-token structure adds another layer. YFSX handles governance and deflationary mechanics, while VIN provides utility and circulation. The idea is that activity across one side can strengthen the other, creating a continuous economic feedback loop. They’re also connected across liquidity pairs with BNB, ETH, XRP, LTC, UNI, CAKE, LINK and DOGE, giving the ecosystem exposure to established assets. The project states that the system has been operating for more than four years and has undergone CertiK audits. Whether the model can continue scaling is the part I’ll be watching. If you want to understand the model better or get involved, check out the Alpha YV Builders group, where you’ll also find information about community events and activities: https://t.co/n8tpp5YXyW YFSX: 0xb7ec60cf8ef96ed48b119277bc7a954a87f27388 VIN: 0x85e43bf8faaf04ceddcd03d6c07438b72606a988 Updates: https://t.co/HV2XXqNBl2 https://t.co/3g3kTyhOa7 https://t.co/RAlcPVvf7S
- Sep 7, 2026
Global 全球币 is approaching its first IEO on GW Wallet. The first round is scheduled for September 8, 2026 at 11:58 PM Beijing time, with the IEO set at 0.1 USDT, compared with the stated latest market price of 0.958 USDT. The structure is also worth noting. IEO tokens will be locked for 360 days, then released at 1% per month. Participation requires a GW Wallet. Token: Global 全球币 CA: 0xf7813c5b7557b001a62883f54240a1db6ffeaeed Need GW Wallet? Visit the official website through Chrome, Edge, or another third-party browser: https://t.co/3BoTPShZsx For Apple users, after installation, you may need to go to Settings → General → VPN & Device Management → Trust the relevant developer profile. More details can be checked on DEX Screener. Global 全球币 | First IEO | 0.1 USDT Verify the official information carefully and DYOR before participating.
- Sep 7, 2026
🚨 HUMABIRD BUY CHALLENGE JUST DROPPED! 🐦🔥 The Shadow of the Huma Bird is putting the spotlight on the believers who are ready to join the flock. 🎁 Buy 500,000 $HUMABIRD and receive 50,000 $HUMABIRD BONUS! How to enter: 1️⃣ Like & RT the challenge post 2️⃣ Buy 500K $HUMABIRD on https://t.co/uIjs0G18Tx 3️⃣ Reply with your Solana wallet + purchase screenshot or TX link 👇 The flock is growing, and the road to Raydium continues. 🐦⚡️ CA: GkJiayT8ej2owKuTRJHmeHZabELsk8UZvYy41Pwgpump Buy: https://t.co/reQ1VvAPfh $SOL #Humabird #SolanaGems #Pumpfun #MemeCoin #Solana
- Sep 6, 2026
BotCoin $BOTZ | @BotCoinBOTZ The meme is only one part of the $BOTZ story. With 50M $BOTZ staking rewards now live and 1M+ $BOTZ allocated to weekly community rewards, the ecosystem is giving its community plenty of ways to get involved. Daily giveaways and creative contests keep things moving while the project works toward long-term growth. Stake. Earn. Participate. Grow With $BOTZ. Website: https://t.co/YR49CgTi1e CA: 8hbHUyJhEKE6SK595ZNKAnNkoJ45gwkR2qskooupump
- Sep 5, 2026
The thing I find most interesting about Kinda $CHIC is how naturally the concept lends itself to community culture. There’s no complicated narrative to decode, “Kinda Chic” is the identity, and the community can take that idea in countless directions through memes, content, and social engagement. With 112M+ $CHIC already burned, the project also has a notable supply-reduction angle that adds more depth to the story. It’s still early, and the community has plenty to prove, but I’m curious to see whether Kinda $CHIC can turn a simple idea into a recognizable Solana meme brand. CA: DFx9Zg1tgjBP9siauXi8QPxSX4QKxeNf7wkh4RFWpump Chart: https://t.co/QQnlCXz1Rs X: https://t.co/Q5xjRTGctI
- Sep 9, 2026
There’s a certain appeal to meme projects that don’t try to overcomplicate their identity. $MARLEY is built around a simple Labrador theme, but the project also puts emphasis on transparent mechanics and community growth. With the dev holding just 1% and a planned 1% supply burn at every $100K market cap milestone, each stage of growth comes with a clearly defined mechanism. It’s still early, and I’m curious to see how far the Marley story can develop. CA: 0x1d84768d0325689e256cec847265f9811f241 https://t.co/aBm2L99L72 https://t.co/oRIH0qaKPv
- Sep 3, 2026
DeFi growth ultimately comes down to the strength of its foundation, and liquidity plays a major role in that. That’s what makes the YFSX VIN approach worth watching. The ecosystem is built around liquidity participation, with its core rules handled through smart contracts rather than a traditional centralized management structure. Liquidity providers help build the foundation while participating in rewards generated through the protocol’s transaction mechanics. If the ecosystem continues expanding, it’ll be interesting to see how that liquidity network develops alongside it. For more details and community discussions, check out the Alpha YV group, where you’ll also find information about community events and activities: https://t.co/rOJoKKmnZg YFSX: 0xb7ec60cf8ef96ed48b119277bc7a954a87f27388 VIN: 0x85e43bf8faaf04ceddcd03d6c07438b72606a988 Updates: https://t.co/RAlcPVvf7S https://t.co/HV2XXqNBl2 https://t.co/3g3kTyhOa7
- Aug 31, 2026
A trading system is only as credible as the record behind its calls. That’s one reason @nermaix caught my attention. Instead of presenting a curated list of successful trades, it publishes the full history of its calls, including entries, exits, and outcomes. The record currently covers 3,254 calls across 69 days, with losses included rather than filtered out. The complete dataset is also available to download, so anyone can review the performance independently. No highlight reel, just the full record. https://t.co/YeVL8IKKCs https://t.co/FHCtAnVOpL
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 290 interactions against 209K followers, an engagement rate of 0.14%. Posts are seen about 184K times each, and 0.157% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 88.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.43 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 4 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 309 interactions. Only 4 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Alpha Gems's engagement rate on X?
- Alpha Gems (@AlphaGems_x1000) has an engagement rate of 0.14%, based on the median interactions across 4 original posts from the last 30 days against 209,407 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.14%, Alpha Gems sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AlphaGems_x1000 have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @AlphaGems_x1000 post?
- Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.43 posts per day across the measured window.