Back to @AlpacaAurelius's profile

Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙 engagement report

@AlpacaAurelius - 1.5M followers on X

Measured over 150 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.056%
of 1.5M followers
Per impression
1.77%
46K views on a typical post
Reach
3.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
820
interactions (median)
Saved
0.211%
98 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
5.87/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 820 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 150 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 150 posts sampled, 49% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 150 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 73% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.056%, Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙 sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.437%
p902.10%
p99159.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,350 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,576 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.437%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile159.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%49K
07:00 UTC-5%53K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%71K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%80K
12:00 UTC-2%88K
13:00 UTC-2%97K
14:00 UTC-4%100K
15:00 UTC-2%103K
16:00 UTC-3%100K
17:00 UTC-3%93K
18:00 UTC-2%87K
19:00 UTC-2%82K
20:00 UTC-1%76K
21:00 UTC-1%67K
22:00 UTC-1%58K
23:00 UTC-1%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%235K
Monday0%296K
Tuesday-3%292K
Wednesday-1%254K
Thursday-2%248K
Friday-3%256K
Saturday+3%230K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 13, 202628x their median

    Marcus Aurelius spoke about this 2000 years ago we need philosophical leaders more than ever https://t.co/7aEjYKGc5O

    20K2.3K5841359K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202613x their median

    something happened in the year 2000 that caused testosterone to tank 30% we are being poisoned https://t.co/kcWuYWeQBP

    9.3K91242585495K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202610x their median

    Alright, this toxic society shit has officially gone too far Golden retriever lifespan has fallen by 40% in the last 50 years https://t.co/hJYdvYnSsy

    7.8K44626235427K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20268.2x their median

    Ladies, stop treating your body like a man's. You tolerate cold less well than he does. You dont do as well with fasting. You need more sleep. Carbs are critical for your hormones. You have a 28 day cycle unlike his 24 hour cycle. Your body is geared to safety, whereas his is geared to challenge.

    6.1K5655835231K viewsView on X
  • Jun 28, 20267.6x their median

    In Ancient Greece, slaves were forbidden from exercising so they didn't get strong enough to revolt. Spartan slaves were deliberately underfed and overworked to prevent rebellion In Feudal Europe, peasants were fed bread and oats while nobles feasted on red meat. Roman gladiators were were fed barley and beans to keep them big, but slow so they couldn't conquer their masters. Controlling a population starts with food and fitness. You get what's happening today right?

    5.2K1.0K5020123K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20266.1x their median

    cows make steak and milk out of grass and then poop out psychedelic mushrooms and you dont believe god exists?

    4.6K356533489K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20266.1x their median

    Wild study Humans are telepathic. But our body suppresses it because it would be too much to handle This is why yogis who meditate a lot and quiet their mind, seem to regain these superpowers. Quiet your mind and it's incredible what you can do. https://t.co/gQuzdXrzXU

    4.4K4636243249K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20265.6x their median

    burger, egg and cheese gives you basically all the nutrients you need in one meal https://t.co/HmaIjwogli

    4.3K2031031798K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20263.9x their median

    if you eat ground beef and rice or ground beef and japanese sweet potatoes every meal, you will be the healthiest youve ever been diet is simple, cheap and easy

    3.0K124594141K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.9x their median

    LOL...even getting burnt in the sun is NEGATIVELY associated with melanoma everything is a lie https://t.co/YQq9wlMVpe

    2.8K2863722129K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 820 interactions against 1.5M followers, an engagement rate of 0.056%. Measured over 150 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 3,862 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 1.77% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.14% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 5.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 150 posts sampled, 49% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 23K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙's engagement rate on X?
Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙 (@AlpacaAurelius) has an engagement rate of 0.056%, based on the median interactions across 150 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,479,459 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.056%, Carnivore Aurelius ©🥩 ☀️🦙 sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,350 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AlpacaAurelius have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,862 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AlpacaAurelius post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 5.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going