Benjamin Allbright engagement report
@AllbrightNFL - 284K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 88 interactions against 284K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.321% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #broncos, #broncoscountry, #positivitycountrytonight.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #broncos, #broncoscountry, #positivitycountrytonight.
Compared with accounts its own size
Benjamin Allbright's engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.031%, Benjamin Allbright sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,782 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.147%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.025% |
| 50th percentile | 0.147% |
| 75th percentile | 0.7% |
| 90th percentile | 2.61% |
| 99th percentile | 82.7% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 38% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 19% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 38% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 276 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 21, 202678x their median
A man bet $325 on a golf tournament and believed he had turned it into $14.2 MILLION. DraftKings voided all five bets and refunded his money. He sued, arguing the sportsbook changed the rules after accepting his wagers. – Nicholas Bavas, 37, from Dallas County, Iowa, spotted an opportunity during the 2024 Pebble Beach Pro-Am as bad weather threatened to cut the tournament short. – On February 3, he placed five bets predicting how the golfers would finish. – The bets were worth a combined $325, with potential payouts totaling $14.2 MILLION. – DraftKings was still accepting wagers even as the weather threatened the final round. – Bavas bet on the positions of golfers who were leading after the third round. – The tournament was eventually called after 54 holes, making those standings the official results. – According to Bavas and his lawyers, all five bets matched the final standings. – But DraftKings voided them and returned his stakes instead of paying the potential winnings. – This won't happen with prediction markets. – On a prediction market, traders take positions against other participants, with payouts determined by the market's contract rules and resolution process. – You're not relying on a traditional sportsbook to honor a winning bet under its house rules. – Bavas argued that DraftKings' rules at the time didn't allow the company to void his particular type of multi-player parlay. – His lawyers also argued that DraftKings changed its rules after the tournament to address similar situations. – DraftKings disputed his claim, arguing that its house rules allowed it to void wagers under these circumstances. – Bavas sued in 2025, seeking the $14.2 MILLION he believed he was owed. – But the case didn't end in his favor. In July 2026, the court ruled for DraftKings, rejecting his bid to recover the money. He risked $325 chasing $14.2 MILLION. The tournament ended early, his picks lined up with the final standings, and he took the fight to court. In the end, DraftKings won the legal battle, and Bavas walked away without the millions he was chasing.
- Oct 21, 202656x their median
Pat McAfee's first MNF alt-cast had 351K viewers, according to a source. That is around half of what the Mannings have received. ESPN declined to confirm the McAfee numbers, which is not common practice.
- Sep 19, 202645x their median
There appears to be mutual interest between Rutgers and Brian Kelly, per @TheAthletic. Kelly, the former Notre Dame and LSU head coach, is very motivated to return to the sidelines next season. Kelly is a Northeast native who would be very comfortable trying to revive Rutgers. https://t.co/cBJ6GBOOnH
- Sep 4, 202642x their median
Faced with Trump tariffs, some U.S. manufacturers are moving production to Ontario and Quebec to cut costs by almost 30 per cent. https://t.co/bEyNOL5wRJ
- Sep 5, 202623x their median
Maybe he really just needed a full offseason to actually build a roster 🤷♂️ https://t.co/30vj8b0BVP
- Apr 25, 202616x their median
Don’t get caught sleeping on New Orleans next year. Whew.
- Sep 4, 202620x their median
Veteran G Shaq Mason has been informed by the NFLPA he will not be disciplined by the NFL and the investigation into his legal matters from 2025 has been closed, per his agent @DerykGilmore. Mason is free to sign with and play for a team immediately. https://t.co/jMnU3X7Qah
- Oct 23, 202619x their median
Sylvester Stallone says he’s completed the script for a new ‘ROCKY’ sequel 👀 "I have written another chapter to the Rocky saga, and I think it would be a good opportunity to explore life outside the ring and how the world is changing around him." Via (TV Insider) https://t.co/TVbY7Tjdal
- Sep 18, 202617x their median
Lions defense hasn’t been close to the same since Glenn left.
- Sep 20, 202613x their median
Biggest shock through two weeks has to be how bad the Chargers look.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 88 interactions against 284K followers, an engagement rate of 0.031%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 39% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 28K times each, and 0.321% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.72% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 38% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.8K interactions, about 78x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #broncos, #broncoscountry, #positivitycountrytonight.
- What is Benjamin Allbright's engagement rate on X?
- Benjamin Allbright (@AllbrightNFL) has an engagement rate of 0.031%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 283,864 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.031%, Benjamin Allbright sits above the 25th percentile of the 213,782 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @AllbrightNFL have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 39% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @AllbrightNFL post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.7 posts per day across the measured window.