Back to @Alissazehra's profile

Alissa Crypto engagement report

@Alissazehra - 699K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 699K followers
Per impression
0.112%
264K views on a typical post
Reach
37.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
296
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 296 interactions against 699K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 264K times each, and 0.112% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 37.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 93% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 512 interactions. Recurring topics include #ad, #crypto, #eth.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026. Recurring tags: #ad, #crypto, #eth.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alissa Crypto's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 9% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Alissa Crypto sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.08%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 2026

    The more I look at DeFi, the more I think consistency is an underrated metric. $YFSX and $VIN have been building since March 2022, with the ecosystem continuing to operate through multiple market cycles rather than being tied to a single market narrative. The project has also expanded its liquidity network and strengthened its security foundation with audits from CertiK and Hacken. Combined with transparent on-chain activity, that gives the ecosystem an interesting base for its next stage of development. It’s not about chasing the latest DeFi trend. I’m more interested in seeing whether YFSX & VIN can continue building and growing from the foundation they’ve established. Definitely one to keep watching. YFSX: 0xb7ec60cf8ef96ed48b119277bc7a954a87f27388 VIN: 0x85e43bf8faaf04ceddcd03d6c07438b72606a988 For updates: https://t.co/8r5te6tb7W https://t.co/SDVW0GUfIO https://t.co/StuGqXnkWi #YFSX #VIN #DeFi #Web3

    40271390309K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 2026

    I’ve been keeping an eye on $HUMABIRD, and there’s definitely some fun momentum building around the community. Word is that rewards may be coming soon, and knowing $HUMABIRD, there might be a few surprises along the way. If you want a chance to be part of it, drop your SOL address in the comments and get involved with the community. Let’s see how many people can get in on the next surprise. Keep an eye on $HUMABIRD, this one could get interesting. CA: GkJiayT8ej2owKuTRJHmeHZabELsk8UZvYy41Pwgpump https://t.co/RypELp414r

    36377550258K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    The Solana meme space is full of anonymous launches, so $ONELOVE immediately caught my attention for taking a different route. The project is connected to One Love Sailing and is led by a real captain, giving the token a real-world story behind the community. Rather than pushing the usual “next 100x” narrative, $ONELOVE is positioning itself as an experiment in community-driven growth and seeing how far a genuine identity can take a new meme coin. It’s still very early, so I’m more interested in watching the community develop and seeing what the team builds from here. CA: F1r5AqRj8bJyzM4nUZpVBH1JQT8ToR4Rvjj2YwxHmoon Also tradable through Coinbase DEX Real Captain. Real business. Real community. https://t.co/1V3p8SxRmK https://t.co/GIgVrv9X98 Always verify the CA. DYOR.

    28562460294K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    Real-world utility is becoming one of the strongest narratives in crypto, especially around payments and cross-border transactions. That’s what caught my attention about ZakPay and the wider Zakat Coin ecosystem. They’ve built Visa-style payment infrastructure using blockchain for cross-border settlement, with funds remaining in custodial accounts until settlement takes place. In other words, blockchain is being used as part of the payment orchestration and settlement infrastructure rather than simply moving customer funds on-chain. But this is where the model gets especially interesting. $ZKTC is integrated directly into the ecosystem’s transaction mechanics. When transactions are settled, $ZKTC is burned to the 0xdead address, permanently removing those tokens from circulation. Then there’s ODS — On-Demand Supply — designed to connect token supply availability with actual economic activity across the ecosystem rather than releasing supply purely according to a schedule. Another interesting part of the model is giving. ZakPay is designed so everyday payment activity can generate charitable contributions. As users send, spend and move money through the ecosystem, a portion can simultaneously support charitable giving. Think about the combination: Real payments → Settlement → $ZKTC utility Transaction activity → Embedded charitable giving Economic activity → ODS supply mechanics That’s a very different approach from launching a token first and trying to build utility around it later. $ZKTC is already live on Coinstore, while ZakPay’s broader commercial rollout is still ahead. The part I’ll be watching closely is what happens to transaction volume, charitable impact and $ZKTC utility if ZakPay starts achieving meaningful real-world adoption. Join the ZakPay waitlist: https://t.co/kaeVyVqFVI ZakPay: https://t.co/UryK7dY7L4 Zakat Coin: https://t.co/9QPTqGdwj0 Telegram: https://t.co/BF1attNUnK ZKTC/USDT on Coinstore: https://t.co/vXmb6hLlRk $ZKTC #ZakatCoin #ZakPay #RWA #Crypto #Payments #CrossBorderPayments #Fintech #Web3

    28257510310K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Most crypto tokens are simply held and traded, but $YFSX $VIN is building a model designed to put on-chain activity at the center of its ecosystem. The dual-token structure connects transactions with liquidity, token burns, and LP rewards. $YFSX applies a 3% transaction fee, while $VIN applies a 2% fee, with portions of each directed toward burns and liquidity/LP rewards. The ecosystem also supports liquidity pools connected to assets such as $ETH, $BNB, $LTC, $LINK, $XRP, $CAKE, $UNI, and $DOGE. The idea is straightforward: increased activity can contribute to deeper liquidity, which can in turn support further ecosystem participation. It’s an interesting DeFi model, and one I’ll be watching as the ecosystem develops. $YFSX: 0xb7ec60cf8ef96ed48b119277bc7a954a87f27388 $VIN: 0x85e43bf8faaf04ceddcd03d6c07438b72606a988 https://t.co/8r5te6tb7W https://t.co/SDVW0GUfIO https://t.co/fPmjh5KpB4

    29056430272K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 2026

    Solana’s meme market is crowded, so projects that actively involve their communities are always worth watching. $BOTZ is taking that route with a focus on keeping the BotCoin community engaged through original memes, daily giveaways, and weekly contests. The project is also allocating 1M $BOTZ every week toward community rewards. On the supply side, 100M $BOTZ has already been burned, while another 200M tokens are locked for 180 days. It’s still early, but I’ll be watching how the community grows and whether BotCoin can maintain that momentum over time. CA: 8hbHUy1JhEKE6SK595ZNKAnNkoJ45gwkR2qskooupump https://t.co/cma2g6ak1o https://t.co/gEa8AuerG2 https://t.co/xwbxiitsqQ

    26865530255K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Fuel prices don't need much to move. A conflict. A supply disruption. A shift in the global energy market. Suddenly, drivers pay more, businesses face higher costs, and families feel the pressure. Hedge Energy is building a decentralized way to hedge against fuel price volatility, helping make fuel costs more predictable. This shouldn't just be a tool for large institutions. It should be accessible to the people who experience fuel volatility every day. Fuel prices are volatile. Your protection shouldn't be. Hedge the fuel. Protect your future. $HED, building at the intersection of energy and decentralized technology.

    27459530225K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 2026

    Job hunting? Run your resume through a free rubric-based scan before you send it out. See how it scores against common ATS best practices + get real fixes. Free through month-end. Get Code here 👉 https://t.co/qk4XAXqzxY via @PButterJelly #jobsearch #Solana #Crypto #ad https://t.co/pTq2dUT1op

    27753470216K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 2026

    There’s a lot of noise in the memecoin market, so projects with a clear identity naturally catch my attention. $DIESEL has built its narrative around Diesel the Dog, combining a recognizable character with creative content and an active community. What I like about the concept is that it keeps things simple. The branding, music, videos, and community all revolve around the same identity, giving $DIESEL a distinct personality within the memecoin space. It’s still early in the journey, but I’m interested to see how far the community can take the Diesel narrative from here. CA: 4gbqirCDG4pJXPMgZMJJNj2u73G9puZwkK3pbPgTpump https://t.co/fKMdnWBJDq https://t.co/YdzvS06d6m https://t.co/4tc2pCr3zj

    26352490275K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 2026

    Scarcity alone doesn't make a crypto project interesting. The mechanism creating that scarcity does. $YFSX recently recorded another 16-token burn, further reducing its available supply. With a maximum supply of 19,999 tokens and the entire supply already circulating, the continued burn mechanism creates an increasingly limited asset base. What separates YFSX VIN from a basic deflationary model is its dual-token ecosystem. $YFSX is designed around governance and deflation, while VIN provides utility and circulation. Their interconnected liquidity structure is designed to create a cycle between ecosystem activity, liquidity, burns, and LP dividends. The project also maintains liquidity pools involving BNB, ETH, XRP, LTC, UNI, CAKE, LINK, and DOGE, creating a mechanism that is designed to remain active alongside movements in established crypto assets. After more than four years of operation, YFSX VIN has continued to pursue a decentralized model rather than relying solely on short-term market narratives. There are plenty of tokens competing for attention. YFSX VIN is interesting because of the mechanism it has built around its supply and liquidity. Worth watching. CA: $YFSX: 0xb7ec60cf8ef96ed48b119277bc7a954a87f27388 $VIN: 0x85e43bf8faaf04ceddcd03d6c07438b72606a988 For updates: https://t.co/8r5te6tb7W https://t.co/SDVW0GUfIO https://t.co/zMMg8l2S61

    18577470272K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#ad#crypto#eth#jobsearch#solana

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 296 interactions against 699K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 3,758 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 264K times each, and 0.112% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 37.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 93% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 512 interactions. Recurring topics include #ad, #crypto, #eth.

What is Alissa Crypto's engagement rate on X?
Alissa Crypto (@Alissazehra) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 698,999 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Alissa Crypto sits above the 25th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Alissazehra have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,758 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Alissazehra post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going