Back to @Alice_Weidel's profile

Alice Weidel engagement report

@Alice_Weidel - 1.4M followers on X

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.925%
of 1.4M followers
Per impression
11.0%
114K views on a typical post
Reach
8.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
13K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.087%
99 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 83% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 13K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.925%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 114K times each, and 11.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 80K interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.

Measured over 71 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Alice Weidel's engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 99% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.925%, Alice Weidel sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video48% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link63% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 48% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 63% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 292 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 9, 20266.4x their median

    Angela Merkel admitted on camera that she deliberately flooded Germany with Muslim migrants to “stop the far-right.” She preferred to erase her own people and put them in danger rather than risk losing power. This wasn’t an accident. It was calculated demographic replacement. https://t.co/BbS7dSKCkB

    57K20K2.2K9851.2M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.7x their median

    "Herr Merz, Sie haben die Botschaft nicht verstanden, die Ihnen die Wähler in Sachsen-Anhalt am vergangenen Sonntag geschickt haben. Das ist nicht weiter relevant, denn Ihre Zeit ist ohnehin abgelaufen. Die Bürger wollen den Politikwechsel, und sie werden ihn bekommen." https://t.co/6G2UrNW5xl

    59K11K1.4K402873K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20264.4x their median

    AfD is the only hope for Germany

    57K8.1K2.1K4084.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 20264.3x their median

    Die spanische Exklave Ceuta wird derzeit überrannt: Bereits mehr als 1.500 Migranten, vorwiegend aus Marokko und Algerien, gelangten in kürzester Zeit in die EU. Ihr Ziel dürfte mutmaßlich Deutschland sein. Grenzen müssen jetzt geschlossen und Abweisungen rigoros durchgesetzt werden. 2015 darf sich nicht wiederholen! https://t.co/yTak4BuNBi

    43K8.3K2.4K3661.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 20264.1x their median

    Gänsehaut 😍 Gerade auf der A20 in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern. Ich bin so stolz auf unsere Kollegen, so stolz auf unsere Partei, so stolz auf Deutschland! Wir hatten Tränen in den Augen als wir unter dieser Brücke durchgefahren sind! Danke! ❤️🇩🇪❤️🇩🇪❤️🇩🇪❤️🇩🇪❤️🇩🇪❤️🇩🇪❤️🇩🇪❤️ https://t.co/Hh1LYLsTWX

    44K5.4K1.6K158899K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20263.7x their median

    Gratulation an @UlrichSiegmund und die @AfD_LSA zu diesem sensationellen Ergebnis - der Abend bleibt spannend! https://t.co/3AImZvz4tk

    40K4.3K1.2K1641.4M viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20263.4x their median

    16% in Berlin, 38% und stärkste Kraft in Mecklenburg-Vorpommern: Vielen Dank an alle Wähler und die vielen engagierten Wahlkämpfer, die diesen Erfolg möglich gemacht haben! https://t.co/Ei6Fqvxe7R

    38K4.7K783165419K viewsView on X
  • Oct 10, 20263.4x their median

    Trump-Deal mit Putin: Sanktionen werden gelockert, über 300.000 t russ. Diesels freigegeben, Preise sollen sinken. So geht das! Während Merz Deutschland mit Sanktionen & teurem LNG ruiniert, macht Trump Realpolitik. Deutsche Interessen statt Eskalation: AfD! https://t.co/8TMvoCSTsT

    34K5.8K3.1K293780K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20263.4x their median

    3 Euro für einen Liter Benzin bedeuten das Aus für bezahlbare Mobilität. Berufspendler und Familien werden durch astronomische Spritpreise schamlos abkassiert. Die Wahrheit ist, dass die Eliten genau das wollten! Sie wollten den Sprit so teuer machen, dass sich niemand mehr das Autofahren leisten kann. Darum: Schluss mit der staatlichen Plünderung an der Zapfsäule! Schluss mit grüner Ideologie! https://t.co/5AGKQgfZdC

    33K7.7K1.1K230436K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 20263.3x their median

    Das Video ist erschütternd: Ein Jugendlicher wird in Frankfurt/Oder von zehn mehrheitlich migrantischen Jugendlichen brutal zusammengeschlagen. Wir müssen unsere Kinder schützen. Nur mit der AfD wird es eine Migrationswende geben! https://t.co/ci54MEi1pr

    35K5.9K929101431K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 13K interactions against 1.4M followers, an engagement rate of 0.925%. Measured over 71 original posts, its engagement rate beats 96% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 114K times each, and 11.0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.39% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 71 posts sampled, 48% carry an image or video and 63% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 80K interactions, about 6.4x its own typical post.

What is Alice Weidel's engagement rate on X?
Alice Weidel (@Alice_Weidel) has an engagement rate of 0.925%, based on the median interactions across 71 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,361,785 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.925%, Alice Weidel sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @Alice_Weidel have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 96% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @Alice_Weidel post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going