Back to @AliVaez's profile

Ali Vaez engagement report

@AliVaez - 92K followers on X

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.102%
of 92K followers
Per impression
0.834%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
12.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
94
interactions (median)
Saved
0.053%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.102%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.834% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 80% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 564 interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iran, #china, #oman.

Measured over 10 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026. Recurring tags: #iran, #china, #oman.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ali Vaez's engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 36% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.102%, Ali Vaez sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video10% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link80% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 10% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 80% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 202 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 20, 20266.0x their median

    NEW: “I wouldn’t buy a rug from that guy.” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent tells me that in response to Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf saying Bessent is “way out of his league” in negotiations. Bessent also accused Ghalibaf of stealing from the Iranian people.

    486381624182K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20265.8x their median

    🇺🇸🇮🇷NEW: Secretary of State Marco Rubio has told several of his foreign counterparts in recent days that "for the time being" the U.S. is not expected to initiate new strikes against Iran and focus on economic pressure. My story on @axios https://t.co/cilmcNReB6

    3721094421193K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.6x their median

    US allies are privately warning that the Strait of Hormuz is still likely mined, casting doubt on President Donald Trump’s claim that the US Navy has completely removed and detonated explosives laid by Iran. https://t.co/lTbZ6gRX8x

    22083201284K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20261.8x their median

    If the U.S. and Iran allow even this modest understanding to disappear, the next cease-fire will become merely the pause before the next battle — and war, rather than diplomacy, could well become the permanent condition. My latest for @NYTOpinion https://t.co/eLQi0nWC03

    1283401075K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 2026

    New poll: — 43% think Iran is more likely to get a bomb now than a year ago, even though stopping one is the top reason people give for continuing the war (40%). — More Americans blame the US (33%) or Israel (22%) than Iran (27%). 52% say attacking was a mistake. — GOP strong approval down from 49% to 34% since April. https://t.co/pMsuMvYb8G

    99238011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    Told @FT: Iran is not a little island. It’s very difficult to impose a hermetic seal around it. Operation Economic Outcast is more of a psychological warfare, aimed at creating a chilling effect. https://t.co/b36Axk6tSo

    9425547.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 2026

    .@SecScottBessent No timeline. Few specifics. No naming names. China not immune but no confirmation Treasury will target. Full of holes.

    82120412K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 2026

    Nate Swanson: Maximum Pressure on Iran Will Fail https://t.co/CjVUWZFgUj

    62223219K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 2026

    صفحه جدیدم در اینستاگرام‌‌‌‌را اینجا دنبال کنید https://t.co/D184M8pn5J

    465108.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Trump’s planned sale of controversial bombs to Israel is largest in years https://t.co/C5XcljvyaT

    282204.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#iran#china#oman#joint_statement#maritimesecurity

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 94 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.102%. Measured over 10 original posts, its engagement rate beats 52% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 0.834% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 10 posts sampled, 10% carry an image or video and 80% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 564 interactions, about 6.0x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iran, #china, #oman.

What is Ali Vaez's engagement rate on X?
Ali Vaez (@AliVaez) has an engagement rate of 0.102%, based on the median interactions across 10 original posts from the last 30 days against 91,556 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.102%, Ali Vaez sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AliVaez have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 52% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AliVaez post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going