Back to @AlgoFoundation's profile

Algorand Foundation engagement report

@AlgoFoundation - 202K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.181%
of 202K followers
Per impression
3.49%
11K views on a typical post
Reach
5.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
368
interactions (median)
Saved
0.057%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.1/day
active 97% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 368 interactions against 202K followers, an engagement rate of 0.181%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 700 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #algorand, #func.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #algorand, #func.

Compared with accounts its own size

Algorand Foundation's engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 78% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.181%, Algorand Foundation sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link19% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 19% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 339 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 13, 20261.9x their median

    Algorand has been shipping nonstop lately ๐Ÿ”ฅ โ€ข We have a new CEO, William Herkelrath โ€ข He joins our Board of Directors alongside @alexanderfowler, CSO at @NexusLabs โ€ข The major Algorand v5.0 upgrade was approved by node runners โ€ข Native post-quantum accounts are live on mainnet โ€ข You can create one now with @PeraAlgoWallet or @LuteWallet โ€ข 1.3M+ PQ transactions signed in just a few weeks โ€ข Fees now scale with resource usage โ€ข Builders get bigger contracts + new AVM capabilities โ€ข We launched AC2, an open protocol for safer AI agent approvals and credential isolation โ€ข We partnered with @FlowTraders to deepen institutional liquidity for ALGO โ€ข @PeraAlgoWallet v7 is live, their biggest update ever โ€ข Algorand ranked #2 in agentic transaction volume in August, with $244K moved by AI agents โ€ข 2.8K+ x402 endpoints are now live on Algorand โ€ข @zerosignal_ai is live on mainnet

    565112101329K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20261.8x their median

    Algorand is powering digital services at Vesuvius National Park ๐ŸŒ‹ Home to one of the world's most iconic volcanoes, the park welcomes ~700,000 visitors a year. Through AlgoWiFi, 200,000+ annual connections support ticketing, QR access & digital postcards, with visitor certification recorded on Algorand.

    536116141234K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 20261.7x their median

    The question is no longer whether the transition to post-quantum security will happen. It's whether organizations will be ready when it does. Algorand started in 2022. Falcon is already live on Mainnet. Today, we're publishing our roadmap to broad quantum resilience by the end of 2027. Read the full roadmap below ๐Ÿ‘‡

    4951132311164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20261.7x their median

    Algorand is now the #2 chain by agentic transfer volume over the last 30 days, according to @tokenterminal. $244K in stablecoins moved by AI agents through x402. And this is still early. x402 is just getting started on Algorand. https://t.co/FKvBXgFAvX

    485117101327K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20261.6x their median

    Native post-quantum accounts shipped on Algorand before GTA 6 came out. Algorand is the real rockstar. https://t.co/dpZlg4kQqg

    4769616612K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.6x their median

    Google and Coinbase both cited Algorand as a leading blockchain in the post-quantum race. Neither of them had seen this upgrade. Algorand v5.0.0 just got voted in, bringing post-quantum accounts at the protocol level. https://t.co/cYhUn78HxJ

    444113141117K viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 20261.5x their median

    Algorand is leading the way on post-quantum resilience with its onchain history protected and native PQ accounts live. But the road doesn't end there. Securing transactions is only part of the equation, consensus selection needs protection too. That's where PQ VRF comes in ๐Ÿงต๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.co/SXHMg3IK3X

    43810713718K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20261.5x their median

    A decent computer. A solid internet connection. 30K ALGO. That's all it takes to run an Algorand validator and earn staking rewards. Join 1.5K+ validators helping secure one of the most decentralized networks out there. https://t.co/S3XWIvmfE0

    43396171015K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 2026

    250,000 post-quantum transactions, and counting! โš›๏ธ Just 4 days after native PQ accounts went live on @PeraAlgoWallet, 250K+ transactions on Algorand have been signed with Falcon-1024. And that's native PQ accounts only, State Proofs not included. We're just getting started. https://t.co/V6V8RbFJrR

    405110111536K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 2026

    Algorand CEO William Herkelrath will be speaking on @FINTECHTVglobal on Tuesday, Sept. 29, at 9:50 AM ET, live from the @NYSE. Watch live: https://t.co/CbuWtxxy7l https://t.co/m71b2sqgTi

    40510514617K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#algorand#func

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 368 interactions against 202K followers, an engagement rate of 0.181%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 70% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 11K times each, and 3.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 33% are part of a thread and 19% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 700 interactions, about 1.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #algorand, #func.

What is Algorand Foundation's engagement rate on X?
Algorand Foundation (@AlgoFoundation) has an engagement rate of 0.181%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 202,092 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.181%, Algorand Foundation sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @AlgoFoundation have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 70% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @AlgoFoundation post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.1 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going